h heavier loader.
That's some thinking that I want to share with you.
2008/6/18 Steve Ochani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Date sent: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:32:41 +0100
> From: James Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:RE: Jrockit Vs Sun
Date sent: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:32:41 +0100
From: James Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Jrockit Vs Sun
To: Tomcat Users List
Send reply to: Tomcat Users List
> Here are the download links
> http://comm
om: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 June 2008 18:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
--
It seems to be licensed, ie not free, and if you can figure out how to
download the thing from that site, you're a better detective than I am.
It seems to b
ue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Johnny Kewl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> - Original Message - From: "James Law"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To:
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:56 PM
> >> Subject: Jrockit Vs Sun
&g
it dynamically resizes the perm generation, so
> in some cases it's better than SUN jvm.
>
> peter
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Johnny Kewl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "James Law" <[EMAIL PR
configurable. I would suggest looking at the docs for an
> authorative answer.
>
> peter
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
>>
>> One thing that is different in JRockit is it dynamically
>> resizes the perm generation, so in some cases it's better
>> than SUN jvm.
>
> Last time I looked, JRockit didn't actually have a generational
&g
> From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
>
> One thing that is different in JRockit is it dynamically
> resizes the perm generation, so in some cases it's better
> than SUN jvm.
Last time I looked, JRockit didn't actually have a generat
r
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Johnny Kewl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "James Law" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:56 PM
> Subject: Jrockit Vs Sun
>
>
>> Ok not quite a Vs que
> From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
>
> It seems to be Suns JRE
It's not - different code base for the JVM core. The Java portion of the JRE
and some of the native libraries may be the same.
When we tried it several years ago, it was sli
- Original Message -
From: "James Law" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:56 PM
Subject: Jrockit Vs Sun
Ok not quite a Vs question, however I'm intrigued by BEA claim that
Jrockit is the "industry leading solutions".
Doe
James Law wrote:
xyz is the "industry leading solution".
That's not exactly a precise scientific or technical expression.
I suppose that when marketing guys get together to create literature
about a product, the conversation goes about like this :
- Ok guys, we need to claim something in ord
Ok not quite a Vs question, however I'm intrigued by BEA claim that
Jrockit is the "industry leading solutions".
Does anyone have any experience in Jrockit, I know some of you will say
"if its not broke" etc J.
I've no issues with Sun's JVM just interested in hearing some views of
Jrockit
Thanks
13 matches
Mail list logo
