On 24/03/17 22:52, Mike Strauch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Mike Strauch
> wrote:
>> ... I’ll take a look.
>
> Appears to be working. Thanks again!
Great. Thanks for the confirmation.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> I think I have fixed this. The fix includes a simplistic test case.
> Verification of the fix would be appreciated.
>
> Mark
Hey Mark,
Apologies, I just noticed your reply. I see the fix in the 8.0.42
release. I’ll take a look.
--
Mike S
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Mike Strauch
wrote:
> ... I’ll take a look.
Appears to be working. Thanks again!
--
Mike Strauch
Lead Software Engineer, Hannon Hill
w. www.hannonhill.com
e mike.stra...@hannonhill.com
-
To u
On 03/03/17 19:58, Mike Strauch wrote:
>> Exactly. An ELContext is being created so that listener should fire.
>
> Cool, thanks!
I think I have fixed this. The fix includes a simplistic test case.
Verification of the fix would be appreciated.
Mark
---
> Exactly. An ELContext is being created so that listener should fire.
Cool, thanks!
--
Mike Strauch
Lead Software Engineer, Hannon Hill
w. www.hannonhill.com
e mike.stra...@hannonhill.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubs
On 3 March 2017 18:08:26 GMT+00:00, Mike Strauch
wrote:
>>> The former solution looks possible and - based on a fairly quick
>review
>>> of the specs - should be happening anyway.
>
>Just wanted to clarify here. Are you saying that it is correct to
>assume that each tagfile invocation should be
>> The former solution looks possible and - based on a fairly quick review
>> of the specs - should be happening anyway.
Just wanted to clarify here. Are you saying that it is correct to
assume that each tagfile invocation should be accompanied by a
ElContextListener.contextCreated() call? or wou
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> I think you have correctly identified the commits responsible for the
> change of behaviour you see.
>
> Of the two solutions you propose, I agree the latter solution is not viable.
>
> The former solution looks possible and - based on a fairl
On 02/03/17 20:18, Mike Strauch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I’ve recently upgraded from Tomcat 8.0.23 to 8.0.41 and noticed that the EL
> context that is available to JSPs in my application is no longer available
> in tagfiles used inside those JSPs (which was the case in 8.0.23).
>
> We have a servlet l
Hello!
I’ve recently upgraded from Tomcat 8.0.23 to 8.0.41 and noticed that the EL
context that is available to JSPs in my application is no longer available
in tagfiles used inside those JSPs (which was the case in 8.0.23).
We have a servlet listener declared in our web.xml which reacts to
conte
10 matches
Mail list logo