-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whom it may concern,
On 1/27/12 6:35 PM, bxqdev wrote:
> 10'000 req/sec 300Kb/response
That should be just under 3GiB (gigabyte) per second response, not 3Gb
(gigabit).
>>> actually when i measured it was less than 1Gb/sec
Is that in gigabit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 1/27/12 4:16 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.h
Considering your previous posts, I wasn't really expecting you to take this lying down.
You haven't disappointed me. The world is full of wonders.
"Un paquet de m. dans un bas de soie".
:-)
bxqdev wrote:
andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
try to be positive, try to
On 28/01/2012 19:07, bxqdev wrote:
> andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
> try to be positive, try to look on the situation from
> another point of view, the one which is not depressive.
> i hope my question & answer summary upgraded your level of tomcat
> understanding.
andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
try to be positive, try to look on the situation from
another point of view, the one which is not depressive.
i hope my question & answer summary upgraded your level of tomcat understanding.
and that's a good thing, because you wouldn
Hi.
Your original question was
quote
1. What are the premises to use either apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
2. Do i get any advantages if i use Sync Servlet Api with Http11NioProtocol connector or
do i have to use Async Servlet A
On 1/28/2012 6:14 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 28 Jan 2012, at 13:34, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combin
On 28 Jan 2012, at 13:34, bxqdev wrote:
> On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
>> On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
>>
>>
>>
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
>>>
>>> well, we are getting too far from the subject.
>>> can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combi
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combinations of
connector+servlet api
1. bio connector + async servlet
2. nio connect
well, let's separate the wheat from the chaff and arrogance:
1. nio connector is useful when one needs to handle a lot of
client connections, keep-alive ones, for example.
2. async servlet is useful when one app thread can fulfill many responses.
3. communication between connector and async servl
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
>> I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
>
> well, we are getting too far from the subject.
> can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combinations of
> connector+servlet api
> 1. bio connector + async servlet
> 2. nio conn
On 27/01/2012 23:16, bxqdev wrote:
>>> 2. async servlet api is not much usefull for servers, with nio
>>> connectors (tomcat-7). at least you can't image the case.
>>
>> I don't say that. In fact, I said exactly the opposite.
>
> well, then what's the case to use both of this technologies? can you
On 1/28/2012 12:09 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 27 Jan 2012, at 23:53, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 6:33 AM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
How much is a lot?
10'000/sec
How many Tomcats are you running?
1
How much RAM/CPU per server etc?
8GB/Xeon
How big is the average response?
300Kb
How many NICs do you have? Have fast are they?
one. as i said above, the actua
On 27 Jan 2012, at 23:53, bxqdev wrote:
>
> On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
How much is a lot?
10'000/sec
How many Tomcats are you running?
1
How much RAM/CPU per server etc?
8GB/Xeon
How big is the average response?
300Kb
How many NICs do you have? Have fast are they?
-Terence Bandoian
---
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
>>>
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Dev
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
>>>
On 1/28/2012 2:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:41, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
both
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Ht
On 27/01/2012 22:41, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
>>> ok, so what about this case:
>>> http nio connector + async servlet
>>> i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
>>> both connector and servlet
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
both connector and servlet code are async.
is there a case when i would need such a
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> 1. What are the premises to use either
> apache.coyote.http
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
> ok, so what about this case:
> http nio connector + async servlet
> i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
> both connector and servlet code are async.
> is there a case when i would need such a combination?
Where someone might ne
On 1/28/2012 1:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:31, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
On 27/01/2012 21:31, bxqdev wrote:
>
> On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> 1. What are the premises to use either
> apach
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioPro
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
>>> Hello, Developers!
>>>
>>> 1. What are the premises to use either
>>> apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
>>> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
>>
>> Eh?
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
>>> Hello, Developers!
>>>
>>> 1. What are the premises to use either
>>> apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
>>> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
>>
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
Eh? Is that what you really mean?
i mean what are the reasons to
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
There is no such protocol as "apache.coyote.http11.Http11Nio
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> 1. What are the premises to use either
> apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
There is no such protocol as "apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol" so
if you try using it, tha
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> 1. What are the premises to use either
> apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
Eh? Is that what you really mean?
> 2. Do i get any advantages if i use Sync Servlet Api with
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol
connectors?
2. Do i get any advantages if i use Sync Servlet Api with Http11NioProtocol connector or do i have to use Async Servlet Api to
get the advan
37 matches
Mail list logo
