I had been too quick with it before, and came up with
what I think is a better fix. I haven't submitted a
patch, but I suppose I could. I work on the NetBeans
project and it would be about the same. For anyone
interested in this issue it is at:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wade,
Wade Chandler wrote:
> Do you want to file a bug or do you want me to? I'm
> looking at the Tomcat 6.0.9 source code.
Even if nobody decides to do anything, please PLEASE log this bug and
get this discussion into bugzilla.
Thanks,
- -chris
--
> M--
> > This email message and any files transmitted with
> it contain confidential
> > information intended only for the person(s) to
> whom this email message is
> > addressed. If you have received this email
> message in error, please
> > notify
> >
e sender immediately by telephone or email and destroy the original
> message without making a copy. Thank you.
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Co
destroy the original
message without making a copy. Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Concurrency with HttpSession
"lightbulb432" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote i
xplain how Tomcat deals with the first two, and what steps
> web application developers need to take to avoid concurrency problems with
> all three cases above? Is it guaranteed that the passivated/replicated
> object is always a consistent view of the HttpSession?
>
> Thanks.
>
--- Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/7/07, lightbulb432 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm reading some book concurrency books that talk
> about potential thread
> > safety issues with HttpSession. Specific cases
> follow:
> >
> > - When the web container passivates an HttpSes
licated
> object is always a consistent view of the HttpSession?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Concurrency-with-HttpSession-tf4403264.html#a12561600
> Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
ion
> >
> > Could somebody explain how Tomcat deals with the
> > first two, and what steps
> > web application developers need to take to avoid
> > concurrency problems with
> > all three cases above? Is it guaranteed that the
> > passivated/replicated
> &g
passivated/replicated
> object is always a consistent view of the
> HttpSession?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/Concurrency-with-HttpSession-tf4403264.html#a12561600
> Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com
anteed that the passivated/replicated
object is always a consistent view of the HttpSession?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Concurrency-with-HttpSession-tf4403264.html#a12561600
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archiv
11 matches
Mail list logo