> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> public void close()
> throws SomeException
> {
> putEndRequest();
> flush();
> socket = null;
> }
> flush() being another function which reads the socket until there's
> nothing left to read, and thr
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT and what to do about it
Looking at that code above, it is obvious that "socket" is open, until
it is set to null, without previously doing a socket.close().
I don't know Java enough
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT and what to do about it
>
> Looking at that code above, it is obvious that "socket" is open, until
> it is set to null, without previously doing a socket.close().
> I don't know Java enough
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT and what to do about it
If these sockets disappear during a GC, then it must mean that they are
still being referenced by some "abandoned" objects sitting on the Heap,
which have no
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT and what to do about it
>
> If these sockets disappear during a GC, then it must mean that they are
> still being referenced by some "abandoned" objects sitting on the Heap,
> which have not
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT and what to do about it
Relatedly, does there exist any way to force a given
JVM process to do a full GC interactively, but from a
Linux command-line ?
Found a command line tool that will do
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT and what to do about it
>
> Relatedly, does there exist any way to force a given
> JVM process to do a full GC interactively, but from a
> Linux command-line ?
Found a command line tool that will do w
Skimmed quickly through your post there while working, so forgive me if
this is irrelevant.
CLOSE_WAIT is a state where the connection has been closed on the tcp/ip
level, but the application (in this case java) has not closed the socket
descriptor yet.
As a coincidence we just fixed this very sa
Hi André,
I didn't fully read all responses, so I hope i don't repeat to much (or
worse contradict statements contained in other replies).
On 08.04.2009 12:32, André Warnier wrote:
> Like the original poster, I am seeing on my systems a fair number of
> sockets apparently stuck for a long time in
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT and what to do about it
>
> Relatedly, does there exist any way to force a given JVM process to do
> a full GC interactively, but from a Linux command-line ?
I haven't found one yet, but there are n
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> This process is started as a daemon, with a "java" command-line.
> Is it possible to add some arguments to that command-line to "induce"
> the JVM to do a GC more often ?
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/hotspot/gc/gc_tuning_6.html - I don't
Peter Crowther wrote:
[...]
If you have some way of forcing that Java process to collect garbage, you
should do so. It's possible for sockets that haven't been close()d to hang
around, unreferenced but not yet garbage collected. A full GC would collect
any of these, finalizing them as it do
Peter Crowther wrote:
[...]
Does that help? Or is it clear as mud?
For no-java-expert-me, it is indeed of the hazy category.
But it helps a lot, in the sense of adding a "+3" in the column "get
back to the vendor and ask them to fix their code".
;-)
Thanks.
---
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> It has been previously established that a socket in a
> long-time-lingering CLOSE-WAIT status, is due to one or the other side
> of a TCP connection not properly closing its side of the
> connection when
> it is done with it.
> I also surmise (withou
Hi.
As a follow-upon another thread originally entitled "apache/tomcat
communication issues (502 response)", I'd like to pursue the CLOSE-WAIT
subject.
Sorry if this post is a bit long, I want to make sure that I do provide
all the necessary information.
Like the original poster, I am seein
15 matches
Mail list logo
