Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Rainer, about the patch below : Is there any chance that this patch would not work if the request being redirected to Tomcat through mod_jk is a sub-request, and/or being made from within an authentication handler ? The reason I am asking : I know that the patch works when the request is a ma

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Rainer Jung wrote: [...] The internals of this dev version are exactly packaged in the form of an official release. So the build process works exactly the same (configure and make), no additional tools needed. True. The version will identify itself as 1.2.28-dev, so you can't hide it's no

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

André, what does that tell you? Update early, update often... ;) Cheers Gregor -- just because your paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you... gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 --

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Rainer Jung wrote: On 18.12.2008 17:22, Pieter Temmerman wrote: [...] Thanks guys. I just *knew* there was a reason why I forgot all that stuff, I just could not remember why exactly. I bet that before I do a "man patch", I'll have to update "man", and that will probably bring messages that

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

On 18.12.2008 17:22, Pieter Temmerman wrote: Hi André, From my experience I can tell you this partly works, but!.. You need to make sure that the glibc version is the same (or older, glibc should be backwards compatible). I usually compile my linux multiplatform binaries in a RH7 machine, whi

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Hi André, >From my experience I can tell you this partly works, but!.. You need to make sure that the glibc version is the same (or older, glibc should be backwards compatible). I usually compile my linux multiplatform binaries in a RH7 machine, which creates binaries that magically seem to be wo

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Rainer Jung wrote: On 18.12.2008 13:07, André Warnier wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Could you try the following patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/extension_crash.patch Thanks for any feedback on the patch. Many thanks for the patch, Rainer, but.. I hate to admit it, but d

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

On 18.12.2008 13:07, André Warnier wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Could you try the following patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/extension_crash.patch Thanks for any feedback on the patch. Many thanks for the patch, Rainer, but.. I hate to admit it, but despite being in this

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Rainer Jung wrote: Could you try the following patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/extension_crash.patch Thanks for any feedback on the patch. Many thanks for the patch, Rainer, but.. I hate to admit it, but despite being in this industry for more than 30 years, I have

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

On 18.12.2008 00:31, André Warnier wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: On 18.12.2008 00:09, Rainer Jung wrote: Question thus : is my above first configuration invalid ? Most likely not invalid, but exotic and thereby not well tested (the SetHandler trick). Will try to reproduce. I can reproduce, but

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Rainer Jung wrote: On 18.12.2008 00:09, Rainer Jung wrote: Question thus : is my above first configuration invalid ? Most likely not invalid, but exotic and thereby not well tested (the SetHandler trick). Will try to reproduce. I can reproduce, but only if the request goes to a virtual serve

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

On 18.12.2008 00:09, Rainer Jung wrote: Question thus : is my above first configuration invalid ? Most likely not invalid, but exotic and thereby not well tested (the SetHandler trick). Will try to reproduce. I can reproduce, but only if the request goes to a virtual server (VHost). I've got

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

On 17.12.2008 23:54, André Warnier wrote: Hi. Responding to my own earlier message, I think I have found what looks like a bug with the combination indicated, and a curious (to me) workaround. Summary : under Linux Suse Enterprise 10.1 using the Apache 2.2.3 (prefork) package of that distribut

Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Hi. Responding to my own earlier message, I think I have found what looks like a bug with the combination indicated, and a curious (to me) workaround. Summary : under Linux Suse Enterprise 10.1 using the Apache 2.2.3 (prefork) package of that distribution using mod_jk 1.2.27 In the Apache ma

Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27

Hi. Despite the subject, I think the Jk Connectors help is here, isn't it ? I am installing/configuring a server for a customer, remotely. The choice of OS or versions and packages is not mine, it is generally mandated, with just a little leeway for small things. My problem is this, as soon a