Re: AW: Too many connections in keepalive state in jk threadpool

2012-08-23 Thread marcobuc
Hi, we are experiencing a very similar problem with the difference that we are using mod_proxy_ajp instead of mod_jk to connect Apache with tomcat. As for mod_jk, the connection is done to the 8009-jk port opened by a connector configured in tomcat server.xml file. We tried configuring the ti

AW: Too many connections in keepalive state in jk threadpool

2012-03-05 Thread Beier Michael
Hallo Herr Jung, >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] > >Hallo Herr Beier, > >On 02.03.2012 11:19, Beier Michael wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> we're running tomcat 7.0.23 on sun jdk 1.6.0_29, connected >via ajp to httpd 2.2.21 using mod_jk 1.2.32. >> >>

AW: AW: Too many connections in keepalive state in jk threadpool

2012-03-02 Thread Beier Michael
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] >Gesendet: Freitag, 2. März 2012 18:53 >An: Tomcat Users List >Betreff: Re: AW: Too many connections in keepalive state in jk >threadpool > >Hi. > >The recommended way of replying to

Re: AW: Too many connections in keepalive state in jk threadpool

2012-03-02 Thread André Warnier
Hi. The recommended way of replying to messages on this list, is to write your replies below the comment/question to which it relates. It makes it much easier to follow the flow of the conversation. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Gesendet: Fre

AW: Too many connections in keepalive state in jk threadpool

2012-03-02 Thread Beier Michael
Hi, all the points you've mentioned are important and have been considered. 5 minutes timeout for connection / keepAlive is a very long time, but this is OK for our web apps running in our intranet. But at the moment I'd be quite happy, if tomcat would make use of the defined timeouts and termi