RE: Troubleshoot why Tomcat stops running (was RE: How do I post a question with the users?)

2022-02-11 Thread Hiran CHAUDHURI
. Such reasons would typically come from outside Tomcat. Hiran -Original Message- From: Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 9:03 To: Tomcat Users List ; Shakila Rajaiah Subject: AW: Troubleshoot why Tomcat stops running (was RE: How do I post a question

AW: Troubleshoot why Tomcat stops running (was RE: How do I post a question with the users?)

2022-02-11 Thread Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH)
tomcat/logs Greetings, Thomas -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Shakila Rajaiah Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2022 22:38 An: Tomcat Users List ; ch...@christopherschultz.net; Hiran CHAUDHURI Betreff: Re: Troubleshoot why Tomcat stops running (was RE: How do I post a question with the

Re: Troubleshoot why Tomcat stops running (was RE: How do I post a question with the users?)

2022-02-10 Thread Shakila Rajaiah
-doc/introduction.html#Directories_and_Files Hiran -Original Message- From: Shakila Rajaiah Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:27 To: ch...@christopherschultz.net; Tomcat Users List Subject: How do I post a question with the users? CAUTION: External mail. Be careful with links and attachm

Troubleshoot why Tomcat stops running (was RE: How do I post a question with the users?)

2022-02-09 Thread Hiran CHAUDHURI
From: Shakila Rajaiah Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:27 To: ch...@christopherschultz.net; Tomcat Users List Subject: How do I post a question with the users? CAUTION: External mail. Be careful with links and attachments. Hi Chris, I deployed a java war file to a remote windows server. However

Re: How do I post a question with the users?

2022-02-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Please do not hijack threads. Do not reply to an existing message and change the subject. Start a new message for a new topic. Mark On 08/02/2022 00:26, Shakila Rajaiah wrote: Hi Chris, I deployed a java war file to a remote windows server. However the Tomcat server stops running after a fe

How do I post a question with the users?

2022-02-07 Thread Shakila Rajaiah
Hi Chris, I deployed a java war file to a remote windows server. However the Tomcat server stops running after a few days / weeks. I need to run a monthly job, therefore the job fails as the server is not running. I am unable to find any information on this. Can someone please help. I can give m

Re: Re: A question about The Relationship between Http Session and WebSocket Session

2018-01-23 Thread tong__...@163.com
OK Thanks Mark! tong__...@163.com From: Mark Thomas Date: 2018-01-23 20:02 To: users Subject: Re: A question about The Relationship between Http Session and WebSocket Session On 23/01/18 10:35, tong__hui wrote: > Hello, > I'm a J2EE Programmer use Tomcat deploy my webapplication.

Re: A question about The Relationship between Http Session and WebSocket Session

2018-01-23 Thread Mark Thomas
On 23/01/18 10:35, tong__hui wrote: > Hello,  > I'm a J2EE Programmer use Tomcat deploy my webapplication. > I have a question about the relationship between Http Session and WebSocket  > Session in tomcat. > Is  Http Session contains WebSocket Session? or they are seperate.

A question about The Relationship between Http Session and WebSocket Session

2018-01-23 Thread tong__hui
Hello,  I'm a J2EE Programmer use Tomcat deploy my webapplication. I have a question about the relationship between Http Session and WebSocket  Session in tomcat. Is  Http Session contains WebSocket Session? or they are seperate. Please help me! Thank you very much! Server version: A

Re: a question about tomcat thread

2017-08-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/08/17 21:39, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > On 8/23/17 4:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 23/08/17 21:17, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> Max threads >= current thread count Current thread count >= >>> current thread busy Current thread count >= Keeped alive sockets >>> count > >> Tha

Re: a question about tomcat thread

2017-08-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 8/23/17 4:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 23/08/17 21:17, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> To whom it may concern, >> >> On 8/22/17 10:28 PM, ophusky wrote: >>> Server version: Apache Tomcat/8.0.35 Server built: May 11 >>> 2016 21:57:08 UTC

Re: a question about tomcat thread

2017-08-23 Thread Mark Thomas
On 23/08/17 21:17, Christopher Schultz wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > On 8/22/17 10:28 PM, ophusky wrote: >> Server version: Apache Tomcat/8.0.35 Server built: May 11 2016 >> 21:57:08 UTC Server number: 8.0.35.0 OS Name:Linux OS >> Version: 3.2.35 Architecture: amd64 JVM Ver

Re: a question about tomcat thread

2017-08-23 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 To whom it may concern, On 8/22/17 10:28 PM, ophusky wrote: > Server version: Apache Tomcat/8.0.35 Server built: May 11 2016 > 21:57:08 UTC Server number: 8.0.35.0 OS Name:Linux OS > Version: 3.2.35 Architecture: amd64 JVM Version:

a question about tomcat thread

2017-08-22 Thread ophusky
Server version: Apache Tomcat/8.0.35 Server built: May 11 2016 21:57:08 UTC Server number: 8.0.35.0 OS Name:Linux OS Version: 3.2.35 Architecture: amd64 JVM Version:1.8.0_45-b14 JVM Vendor: Oracle Corporation _

Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint

2017-06-08 Thread kmaxwilliams43
Fifgfdyfyi Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.   Message d'origine   De: 王琳 Envoyé: vendredi 9 juin 2017 01:37 À: users@tomcat.apache.org Répondre à: Tomcat Users List Objet: Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint Thank you -- View this message in context:

Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint

2017-06-08 Thread kmaxwilliams43
Fictdyhcu Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.   Message d'origine   De: 王琳 Envoyé: vendredi 9 juin 2017 01:37 À: users@tomcat.apache.org Répondre à: Tomcat Users List Objet: Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint Thank you -- View this message in context:

Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint

2017-06-08 Thread 王琳
Thank you -- View this message in context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/A-question-about-websocket-API-Annotation-ServerEndpoint-tp5064163p5064200.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To

Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint

2017-06-08 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/06/17 02:06, 王琳 wrote: > Hi friend: > i have a question. use Tomcat 8.5.15 > @ServerEndpoint API has 'value' summary. This value mapping url.When the url > has parameter,use {}. > for example: > @ServerEndpoint(value = > "/websocket/fmsWeb

A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint

2017-06-07 Thread 王琳
Hi friend: i have a question. use Tomcat 8.5.15 @ServerEndpoint API has 'value' summary. This value mapping url.When the url has parameter,use {}. for example: @ServerEndpoint(value = "/websocket/fmsWebsocket/{userId}/{companyId}/{groupId}") js:var url = "ws://192.16

A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint

2017-06-07 Thread 王琳
Hi friend: i have a question. use Tomcat 8.5.15 @ServerEndpoint API has 'value' summary. This value mapping url.When the url has parameter,use {}. for example: @ServerEndpoint(value = "/websocket/fmsWebsocket/{userId}/{companyId}/{groupId}") js:var url = "ws://192.16

Re: a question about Realm config

2017-06-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
validateUri="false"/> > > Everything is all right,thanks again! I'd highly recommend removing the URL rewriting if possible. Either remove the leading /tomcat from your URI space on the proxy or re-name your application's WAR (or exploded WAR directory) to tomcat#sa

Re: Re: a question about Realm config

2017-06-01 Thread ophusky
发送时间:2017-06-01 15:50 主题:Re: a question about Realm config 收件人:"Tomcat Users List" 抄送: This time to the list... On 01/06/17 08:02, ophusky wrote: > Tomcat version:8.0.43.0 > Nginx version:openresty/1.11.2.2 > OS:CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) > > I have al

Re: a question about Realm config

2017-06-01 Thread Mark Thomas
This time to the list... On 01/06/17 08:02, ophusky wrote: > Tomcat version:8.0.43.0 > Nginx version:openresty/1.11.2.2 > OS:CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) > > I have already configure tomcat to use the DIGEST certification, > When I have direct access to Tomcat all normal, > http://192.1

a question about Realm config

2017-06-01 Thread ophusky
Tomcat version:8.0.43.0 Nginx version:openresty/1.11.2.2 OS:CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) I have already configure tomcat to use the DIGEST certification, When I have direct access to Tomcat all normal, http://192.168.122.130:8080/sample/test/test.html can trigger the certification and

Re: A question regarding websocket implementation of Apache Tomcat 8.0.33

2016-05-12 Thread Tejas Nandanikar
Isn't there any workaround to this situation? In my application, a database update operation depends on whether the message was delivered to the client or not, so in that scenario, I would never know if the message was delivered. And even if onError() is called later, I can never know which message

Re: A question regarding websocket implementation of Apache Tomcat 8.0.33

2016-05-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/05/2016 08:24, Tejas Nandanikar wrote: > Thank you for your quick reply. > So consider a case where client abruptly loses internet connection. > In that scenario, the sendText() would return normally as the server > hasn't received 'close' packet from the client, did I get it right? Assuming

Re: A question regarding websocket implementation of Apache Tomcat 8.0.33

2016-05-12 Thread Tejas Nandanikar
Thank you for your quick reply. So consider a case where client abruptly loses internet connection. In that scenario, the sendText() would return normally as the server hasn't received 'close' packet from the client, did I get it right? On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 12

Re: A question regarding websocket implementation of Apache Tomcat 8.0.33

2016-05-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/05/2016 06:16, Tejas Nandanikar wrote: > I am using Apache Tomcat 8.0.33. > I was going through Java documentation about RemoteEndpoint.Basic > which says that sendText(String text) blocks until all of the message > has been transmitted. > But I noticed that when the client loses internet con

A question regarding websocket implementation of Apache Tomcat 8.0.33

2016-05-11 Thread Tejas Nandanikar
I am using Apache Tomcat 8.0.33. I was going through Java documentation about RemoteEndpoint.Basic which says that sendText(String text) blocks until all of the message has been transmitted. But I noticed that when the client loses internet connection and sendText() method is called on the server s

Re: I have a question about websocket in tomcat7.0.30

2012-11-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zane, On 11/19/12 10:56 PM, zane_zh...@wistronits.com wrote: > I am trying to build a chat-room in the internet by websocket > based on tomcat7.0.30. the link between server and browser is not > reliable. when I try to send a message to server from br

I have a question about websocket in tomcat7.0.30

2012-11-19 Thread Zane_Zhang
Dears I am trying to build a chat-room in the internet by websocket based on tomcat7.0.30. the link between server and browser is not reliable. when I try to send a message to server from browser after the websocket connection having been built, the server has no respond, but this just occasi

Re: A question about the lifecycle of Tomcat

2012-09-08 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/9/7 Mark Thomas : > >> How about Apache Tomcat 6.x.x? When is the end for the support? > > No plans at the current time. Best guess is that it is at least two years > away. There will be at least 12 months notice of eol. > > The biggest driver is the J2EE specification process. A new specific

Re: A question about the lifecycle of Tomcat

2012-09-07 Thread Mark Thomas
Wei Chen wrote: >Hi all, > >Recently I read from http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-55-eol.html that >Apache Tomcat team will end their support for Apache Tomcat 5.5.x will >end on 30 September 2012. I wonder if there any timeline for the >lifecycle for Apache Tomcat? No. > How about Apache Tomcat

A question about the lifecycle of Tomcat

2012-09-07 Thread Wei Chen
Hi all, Recently I read from http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-55-eol.html that Apache Tomcat team will end their support for Apache Tomcat 5.5.x will end on 30 September 2012. I wonder if there any timeline for the lifecycle for Apache Tomcat? How about Apache Tomcat 6.x.x? When is the end for t

Re: a question on tomcat failover

2012-03-17 Thread Mark Thomas
charles didonato wrote: >I have 2 instances of Tomcat 7.0 on the same host with two manager apps >(different ports) and two AJP connectors On different ports. Apache 2.4 is >providing the load balancing and >when I stop one instance of Tomcat, it fails over To the other instance. My >questi

a question on tomcat failover

2012-03-17 Thread charles didonato
I have 2 instances of Tomcat 7.0 on the same host with two manager apps (different ports) and two AJP connectors On different ports. Apache 2.4 is providing the load balancing and when I stop one instance of Tomcat, it fails over To the other instance. My question is should I have to stop

Re: A question about thread dump!

2011-05-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/11/2011 3:11 AM, chateau Xiao wrote: > for the necessary of debug. I need the thread dump information like below to > show me the threads running status. > > [snip] > > I usually use kill -3 or jstack to satisify my requirement. when > things

A question about thread dump!

2011-05-11 Thread chateau Xiao
hi all: for the necessary of debug. I need the thread dump information like below to show me the threads running status. Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (16.3-b01 mixed mode): "Attach Listener" daemon prio=10 tid=0x01f55000 nid=0x4726 runnable [0x] j

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-20 Thread thomas2004
al commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26443598.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-20 Thread Rainer Jung
On 20.11.2009 09:03, thomas2004 wrote: > >> Scroll back to Rainer's message dated 17/11/2009. > There is a question there. The answer to that question is what Rainer > is waiting for. > > > Ok, here again Rainer's question: > > >> I know, that

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-20 Thread thomas2004
>Scroll back to Rainer's message dated 17/11/2009. There is a question there. The answer to that question is what Rainer is waiting for. Ok, here again Rainer's question: > I know, that you have seen a problem, the errno=11 thing. I need to > know, whether *this* problem

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-19 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: Rainer is asking you a question, here. If you can work with him, I'm sure he'll be able to diagnose and possibly solve your problem. Sorry for my misunderstanding Rainer's question. I can surely work with him. Just tell me how and in which way. I will try my

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-19 Thread thomas2004
>Rainer is asking you a question, here. If you can work with him, I'm sure he'll be able to diagnose and possibly solve your problem. Sorry for my misunderstanding Rainer's question. I can surely work with him. Just tell me how and in which way. I will try my best. -- Vi

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
no socket-timeout and no >> reply_timeout is set. >> >> Your reproduction attempt using a simple html snippet did *not* show a >> mod_jk problem and therefore is of no interest for me at the moment. >> Let's concentrate on the test case with errno=11. > >

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread thomas2004
w a mod_jk problem and therefore is of no interest for me at the moment. Let's concentrate on the test case with errno=11. Ok. Hope to hear good news soon. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26403187.html Sent

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Hello Thomas, On 17.11.2009 11:05, thomas2004 wrote: > >> I think the reproduction with html is not working because of some other > reasons likely not related with mod_jk. In the original message he has a > jk error message referring to errno 11=EAGAIN. There is a change between > 1.2.26 and 1.2.

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread thomas2004
y one can check if this problem has to do with mod_jk (or apache httpd) version or not. Regards Thomas -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26387241.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list arc

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread thomas2004
working and that 1.2.28 was not working. Has that changed? This problem doesn't occur by the machine where the mod_jk1.2.26 and Apache 2.0.46 installed. This problem occurs by the machine where mod_jk 1.2.28 and Apache 2.0.52 installed. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread Rainer Jung
On 13.11.2009 15:49, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Thomas, > > On 11/13/2009 2:55 AM, thomas2004 wrote: >> Sorry, the return page this time should just contains simply text, somewhat >> like "Generated in 0 msec[query time: 22186 msec, processing time: 20 >> msec] for 36 contracts. ", not a PDF

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/13/2009 2:55 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > Sorry, the return page this time should just contains simply text, somewhat > like "Generated in 0 msec[query time: 22186 msec, processing time: 20 > msec] for 36 contracts. ", not a PDF-stream si

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread thomas2004
the stop button on the browser), But when I move the same workers.properties configuration to another machine with mod_jk 1.2.26 and Apache/2.0.52, it works fine. So I thing it might lie on mod_jk or Apache version. Hope you understood my problem now. -- View this message in context: h

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: I cannot tell you what's wrong, but I can tell you that the log you show below, shows that the JBoss response is a HTML document, not a PDF. So maybe you have to revise some of your assumptions. Sorry, you are right. This time I haven't test the PDF generation since I just w

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread thomas2004
t to test the simple case. The returned page contains only text. But I can't get the return page though long after the processing on Jboss is finished and send back the render. On the machine with mod_jk-1.2.26 I can get the return page. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.co

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
nux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 8) 64 bit I am not sure these make different. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26332661.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archi

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: log-message in mod_jk.log Continue: But it's still a HTML response, not a PDF. [code] [Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker_portfolio_son1 [Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug] ajp_reset

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: ... I cannot tell you what's wrong, but I can tell you that the log you show below, shows that the JBoss response is a HTML document, not a PDF. So maybe you have to revise some of your assumptions. ... 00 00 FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 - 0... [Thu Nov 12 15:50

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/12/2009 10:12 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > I issue a request from the client (browser) to the to generate the report. > On Jboss-log I can watch as follow: > > 2009-11-12 15:50:24,094 INFO [STDOUT] - 1. Get data - > 2009-11-12 15:56

RE: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26320475.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For

RE: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
est.civ-versicherung.de 351.425973 [Thu Nov 12 15:56:15 2009] [9287:2537062720] [debug] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2599): Service finished with status=200 for worker=worker_portfolio_son1 [/code] -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp262

RE: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: thomas2004 [mailto:thomas200...@yahoo.de] > Subject: Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration > > Where is 'Bugzilla'? Try the link from the Tomcat home page, cleverly hidden under the name "Bug Database". - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTA

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
> Thomas can open an issue in Bugzilla, which helps us not forgetting it. > Topic: "Socker read returns EAGAIN during long wait". > > Regards, > > Rainer > > Where is 'Bugzilla'? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.11.2009 22:53, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Thomas, > > On 11/11/2009 9:45 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > >>> 20-40 minutes is an unreasonable amount of time to wait for an HTTP request >> to complete. I recommend changing your architecture so that HTTP requests >> don't have to take so long. > >

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/11/2009 9:45 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > >> 20-40 minutes is an unreasonable amount of time to wait for an HTTP request > to complete. I recommend changing your architecture so that HTTP requests > don't have to take so long. > > Surely is

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread thomas2004
> Without socket_timeout the log message looks as follow: [code] [Wed Nov 11 14:25:13 2009] [1976:2537062720] [info] ajp_handle_cping_cpong::jk_ajp_common.c Please ignog my post. The log message is wrong. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread thomas2004
want to change their program. They said it works by mod_jk 1.2.26, why not by 1.2.28? I am not able to give them a satisfied answer. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26302415.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread thomas2004
worker JkMount /myWeb/* worker_portfolio_son1 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26302185.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer, On 11/10/2009 11:26 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > It's possible, that this would work as a workaround. The usual "let some > bits dripple to keep the connection active" strategy. Ugh. Why not have the request fire-off a report-generation thread th

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/10/2009 2:53 AM, thomas2004 wrote: >> Just to confirm: you have a single request that takes 20-40 minutes to >> fulfill? Or do you issue a request to generate the report and then, >> later, issue a request to retrieve the (already-genera

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.11.2009 17:12, André Warnier wrote: > Rainer Jung wrote: >> On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote: Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped. >>> I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it >>> doesn't help. >> > ... > Hi. > Just my To

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread André Warnier
Rainer Jung wrote: On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote: Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped. I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it doesn't help. ... Hi. Just my Tomcat- and Java-dummy look on this. As I understand the basic i

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote: > >> Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped. > > I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it > doesn't help. > My workersproperties looks now as follow: > > [code] > worker.worker_portfolio_son1.conne

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread thomas2004
//tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html I will try this later and tell you the result. Btw, is there any difference between mod_jk 1.2.26 and 1.2.28. I wonder why it works by 1.2.26 but not by 1.2.28. Regards Thomas -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-qu

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 09.11.2009 11:27, thomas2004 wrote: > > I newly installed the mod_jk 1.2.28 and since then got problem (see below). > > ** > We have a web application deployed on Jboss (RH Linux OS). The access to the > web application is via a Apache Httpd Web Server. One of the function

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-09 Thread thomas2004
do with cache. But I don't know where and which one. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26279572.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/9/2009 5:27 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > We have a web application deployed on Jboss (RH Linux OS). The access to the > web application is via a Apache Httpd Web Server. One of the function of > this web application is one can online generate

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-11-09 Thread Rainer Jung
I suspect some conspiracy is going on: just bought a book during ApacheCon US and on the flyleaf with citations it contains: "To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail" (Mark Twain) ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users

A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-09 Thread thomas2004
this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26264069.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr..

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-11-02 Thread André Warnier
Elli Albek wrote: How did this make it into the tomcat users list? :) CPAN: Driven by users. Java (JCP) Driven by vendors. Tomcat logging: driven by Java Hammer (tm) manufacturers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-11-02 Thread Elli Albek
How did this make it into the tomcat users list? :) CPAN: Driven by users. Java (JCP) Driven by vendors.

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-11-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 10/31/2009 9:53 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Fortunately, this is not about to happen to java programmers. Zing! - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozd

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotationon "catalina.out")

2009-11-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 10/31/2009 4:59 AM, André Warnier wrote: > I know, someone is going to say that one shouldn't > mess around in a nuclear power plant if one hasn't read the manual. Oddly enough, Sun's Java source (that is, the source code to the .java files

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-31 Thread André Warnier
Leon Rosenberg wrote: On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM, André Warnier wrote: Leon Rosenberg wrote: They are saying: In the time java developers picks the gun, the php developer runs away with the prey. And the c developer seems to be thinking about best fitting boots. The perl developer in t

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-31 Thread Leon Rosenberg
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Leon Rosenberg wrote: >> >> They are saying: In the time java developers picks the gun, the php >> developer runs away with the prey. And the c developer seems to be >> thinking about best fitting boots. >> > The perl developer in the meanti

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-31 Thread André Warnier
Leon Rosenberg wrote: They are saying: In the time java developers picks the gun, the php developer runs away with the prey. And the c developer seems to be thinking about best fitting boots. The perl developer in the meantime created a module which will allow him to catch the rest of the spec

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotationon "catalina.out")

2009-10-31 Thread André Warnier
David kerber wrote: Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 10/30/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log- rotationon

RE: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread George Sexton
> -Original Message- > From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 1:53 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log- > rotation on "catalina.out") > &g

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Leon Rosenberg
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Java is for big boys only, isn't it? > > I've heard that recent (even several years old, now) versions of Java > VMs can "match" the speed of compiled C++ for many non-trivial uses. > But, can the Java compiler use its generics feature

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotationon "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread David kerber
Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 10/30/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log- rotationon "catalin

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotationon "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 10/30/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] >> Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log- >> rotationon "catalina.out&

RE: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotationon "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Robert Koberg [mailto:r...@koberg.com] > Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log- > rotationon "catalina.out") > > I have been trying to pound in a nail with java. I have tried > everything and the damn nail just won't go in.

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotationon "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Robert Koberg
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log- rotationon "catalina.out") Here's one Java can't do (without significant help):

RE: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotationon "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log- > rotationon "catalina.out") > > Here's one Java can't do (without significant help): > > Write a command-line (no GUI)

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre, On 10/30/2009 9:21 AM, Pierre Goupil wrote: > I'm a true Java developper (tm). If a problem can't be solved with Java, > that's not a real problem. Here's one Java can't do (without significant help): Write a command-line (no GUI) app that p

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Pierre Goupil
I'm a true Java developper (tm). If a problem can't be solved with Java, that's not a real problem. Java is for big boys only, isn't it? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:12 PM, André Warnier wrote: > Peter Crowther wrote: > >> >> At the other end of the language-complexity scale, I can't remember >> t

Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread André Warnier
Peter Crowther wrote: At the other end of the language-complexity scale, I can't remember the source of the quote but I do appreciate "When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a screw." I don't know what you people are all talking about. We Perl programmers don't have such issues. It do

[OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out")

2009-10-30 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/10/30 Caldarale, Charles R : > Smalltalk is a classic example of the philosophy: "I have a hammer, therefore > everything is a nail." I used to teach Smalltalk*. Of a 3-day course, 1/4 day was on the language, 1/2 day was on the environment and the rest was on the class library. It's an in

Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out"

2009-10-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 10/29/2009 6:47 PM, André Warnier wrote: > 4) If it works, this has got to go on the WiKi I apologize for possibly sounding like a jerk, but my suggestion seemed somewhat self-evident given the various configuration options. > Christopher

RE: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out"

2009-10-29 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] > Subject: Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out" > > Two times in one day: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd- > docs/200910.mbox/raw/%3c20091029112545.gz5...@cr%3e/ > > con

Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out"

2009-10-29 Thread Rainer Jung
On 30.10.2009 01:35, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com >> [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther >> Subject: Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out" >> >> ... you've not played w

RE: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out"

2009-10-29 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com > [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther > Subject: Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out" > > ... you've not played with Smalltalk, have you? :-) Arithmetic isn't > built int

  1   2   >