On 2/12/2013 9:36 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 2/11/13 4:30 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
I understand the considerations above and they are a part of the
prevailing thinking. However, one underlying assumption of the
supporting argument appears to be that today's programmers are not
cap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Terrence,
On 2/14/13 1:23 AM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
> I probably should have said there is a "potential for lost
> knowledge". Here are a couple of anecdotal examples that I hope
> will help illustrate what I mean.
>
> - I was told recently
On 2/12/2013 9:36 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 2/11/13 4:30 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
I understand the considerations above and they are a part of the
prevailing thinking. However, one underlying assumption of the
supporting argument appears to be that today's programmers are not
cap
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>Subject: Build vs. buy (Was: [Seriously OT] Help in diagnosing server
>unresponsiveness)
>
>Re-writing just because a piece of code has become out-of-touch with current
>standa
Em 12/02/2013 13:36, Christopher Schultz escreveu:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/11/13 4:30 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
I understand the considerations above and they are a part of the
prevailing thinking. However, one underlying assumption of the
supporting argument
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> On 2/11/13 4:30 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
>
> I understand the considerations above and they are a part of the
> prevailing thinking. However, one underlying assumption of the
> supporting argument appears to be that today's programmers are
On 2/10/2013 7:13 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Terrence,
On 2/9/13 8:01 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
On 2/6/2013 9:26 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
IMO, developer performance trumps runtime performance most of
the time.
So, if you can create a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Terrence,
On 2/9/13 8:01 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
> On 2/6/2013 9:26 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>>> IMO, developer performance trumps runtime performance most of
>>> the time.
So, if you can create a more maintainable system in less time
>
On 2/6/2013 9:26 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
IMO, developer performance trumps runtime performance most of the time.
>So, if you can create a more maintainable system in less time by using
>EJB (or whatever), then you go ahead and do it: servers are cheap,
>while developer time is expensive.
>
>- -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 2/6/13 3:05 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> As maybe one more rant to add to this series, and as a reply to
> the "just throw more hardware at it, it's cheap" line.
In my defense, I was mostly talking about the trade-offs between
something tha
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:06 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: [Seriously OT] Help in diagnosing server unresponsiveness
-Original Message-
From: C
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:06 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [Seriously OT] Help in diagnosing server unresponsiveness
>
> > -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 11:02 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [Seriously OT] Help in diagnosing server unresponsiveness
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
Re: [Seriously OT]
>> Help in diagnosing server unresponsiveness
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
>> IMO, developer performance trumps runtime performance most of the
>> time. So, if you can create a more maintainable system in less
>> time by using EJ
Em 06/02/2013 13:26, Jeffrey Janner escreveu:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:59 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [Seriously OT] Help in diagnosing server unresponsiveness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:59 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [Seriously OT] Help in diagnosing server unresponsiveness
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Chris,
>
> On 2/2/13 11:47 AM, chris derham wrote:
>>> In the Java world, most people would only call it a consider it
>>> a "cluster" if the app servers actually know about each othe
Chris,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Howard,
>
> On 2/1/13 9:57 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you want to improve performance even mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 2/2/13 11:47 AM, chris derham wrote:
>> In the Java world, most people would only call it a consider it
>> a "cluster" if the app servers actually know about each other --
>> for instance, if you are using session replication. IMO session
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 2/1/13 9:57 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>>
>> If you want to improve performance even more, ditch EJB
>> altogether.
>
> Wow, that hurt. ditch EJB altogether? I 'grew
20 matches
Mail list logo
