On 2/3/2012 11:22 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex,
On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
[snip]
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
changing its content.
LMAO Tha
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex,
On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
[snip]
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
changing its content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
Note that you coul
On 03/02/2012 16:02, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 2/3/12 6:12 AM, Pid wrote:
>> DarkEnergy[TM] compiles to bytecode presumably? Seems everyone &
>> their dog is inventing JVM languages, no reason why we can't. QLG
>> is a hard problem to solve, so I'd expect the syntax to be more
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 2/3/12 6:12 AM, Pid wrote:
> DarkEnergy[TM] compiles to bytecode presumably? Seems everyone &
> their dog is inventing JVM languages, no reason why we can't. QLG
> is a hard problem to solve, so I'd expect the syntax to be more
> complex, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex,
On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
> changing its content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
>>> Note tha
On 2/3/2012 6:12 AM, Pid wrote:
On 03/02/2012 07:55, André Warnier wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: David Kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: Re:
Regarding compatibility
It will be open source, right?
Both open *and* closed source.
But you won't know which until you d
On 03/02/2012 07:55, André Warnier wrote:
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: David Kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: Re:
>>> Regarding compatibility
>>
> It will be open source, right?
>>
Both open *and* closed source.
>>
>>> But you won't know which until you download it
[snip]
> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
> >>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
> >>> content.
> >>
> >> LMAO That might be achievable.
> >>
> > Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned, by
> > having the response time be random. So you would e
On 2/2/2012 5:09 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Pid wrote:
On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Pid,
On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
content.
Pid wrote:
On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Pid,
On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
Note that
On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>> We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>
> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
> content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
p
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
