Re: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dong, JiaDong Huang wrote: > Since the Request Object usage has already been stated in the spec. Maybe > Tomcat can have certain JSP verification tool. Is any thing like that > available? Or it is not possible to do technically at all. Maybe it can th

RE: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread JiaDong Huang
/testing. Dong -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2006 3:13 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [OT] Multi processor issue -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Chris

Re: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread Leon Rosenberg
On 12/13/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Slightly off-topic, there was a bug filed against the session manager where a "session use" counter was being used in a non-threadsafe way (and /really/ needed to be synchronized).

Re: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [OT] Multi processor issue >> >> In that case, the OP could wrap their own request objects to actually >> prevent

RE: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OT] Multi processor issue > > In that case, the OP could wrap their own request objects to actually > prevent their bug in production while researching it in dev/test, The problem with doing so in this case i

Re: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: JiaDong Huang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: Multi processor issue >> >> Not sure if the app really cares which thread should do the >> parameterMap initialization. > > You're missing the entir

RE: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-12 Thread JiaDong Huang
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 2:29 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: [OT] Multi processor issue > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OT] Multi processor issue > > There is an OS called Clouds where threads could actual

RE: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-11 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OT] Multi processor issue > > There is an OS called Clouds where threads could actually > migrate between machines in a cluster. I suppose the "thread" > doesn't really "migrate", b

Re: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, > If you're suggesting that one thread may change its process > association, that is theoretically possible on some OS implementations > (anybody remember Multics?) There is an OS called Clouds where threads could actually migrate between mach