cloneDX/cyclonedx-maven-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/org/cyclonedx/maven/DefaultModelConverter.java#L147>.
Should we then not have an 'apache'/'asf' type at all? Or only for
artifacts that cannot be described using any other type? Or for all
artifacts, making an 'e
Users List
Subject: AW: Package URLs for Apache Tomcat distributions
[You don't often get email from thomas.hoffm...@speed4trade.com.invalid. Learn
why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> On 11/04/2024 16:52, von Loewenstein, Jan wrote:
> > Hi folks
Hi folks,
I am part of the Paketo community, and we are providing Cloud Native Buildpacks
to create container images with – amongst other technologies – Apache Tomcat
and Apache TomEE as application runtimes.
One of the features of Cloud Native Buildpacks is that images come with
Software-Bill
