RE: RE: BOOBIES!

2006-07-23 Thread cknell
By resisting the thread (an understandable and perfectly reasonable tack) you have missed some facts. I (who posted a link to a bird) was very definitely not the original poster nor did I use any of the other words that some have found so offensive. I simply thought by injecting a light-hearted

RE: Re: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-23 Thread cknell
I've been publicly called a low-life by you. This amounts to a libel and I'm still entitled to an apology from you for it. While you are entitled to disagree with my view that perhaps the reaction to this was over the top, you are not entitled to call me a low-life in a public forum. Now as to

RE: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-22 Thread cknell
Thank you. I was caught up in a witch hunt and feel undeservedly bashed over my attempt to inject some light-hearted jest into an overheated atmosphere. Plainly the poster who calls him or herself "Dakota Jack" didn't view the link. He or she had already made up his or her mind and couldn't be

RE: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-22 Thread cknell
Gee, Jack. Maybe you didn't follow the link and simply assumed what was on the other end. -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:45:35 -0700 To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Re: Re: B

RE: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-21 Thread cknell
http://www.globaladrenaline.com/hbs/images/QN---Blue-Footed-Boobie-1.jpg -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:41:41 -0700 To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Re: BOOBIES! Right,

RE: Re: What, exactly, is meant by "full path" when construction web.xml entries

2006-03-20 Thread cknell
Thanks. Yes, of course on the matter of the package name. I think I've grasped the points I was struggling with. I have saved the spec to my local disk, and when I'm comfortable enough with the general concepts, I'll be able to read it and understand it. -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ema

RE: Re: What, exactly, is meant by "full path" when construction web.xml entries

2006-03-20 Thread cknell
Thanks for the sanity check. That did what I expected, so to expand on this, if I were creating a "real" servlet whose source code opened like this: package com.kilonovember.Monkey; import javax.servlet.*; import javax.servlet.http.*; import java.io.*; public class Monkey extends HttpServlet{ .

RE: Re: What, exactly, is meant by "full path" when construction web.xml entries

2006-03-20 Thread cknell
> ensure you put it in correct package. My example servlet is not part of a package. Here is the opening part of the source code file: import javax.servlet.*; import javax.servlet.http.*; import java.io.*; public class Ch1Servlet extends HttpServlet{ > The author probably mean the classname+

RE: RE: What, exactly, is meant by "full path" when construction web.xml entries

2006-03-20 Thread cknell
Thanks for your reply, but reading the full spec doesn't fit my learning style. I don't know anyone who learned to program by reading a book from start to finish, and then sat down and wrote a complex program. Most people need a little snippet, something small and comprehensible, to get started.

What, exactly, is meant by "full path" when construction web.xml entries

2006-03-20 Thread cknell
I've poked at Tomcat for several years now. I find myself looking for a job and have too much time on my hands, so I've decided to take servlets seriously and grasp the concepts. Yesterday I spent a fair amount of time Googling for how to set up a pair of elements in the web.xml file on my Wi

RE: Concept for modeling hierarchical data

2006-01-10 Thread cknell
At the risk of pointing out the obvious, why not use what tomcat uses to store hierarchical data, XML? -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Florian Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:05:08 +0100 To: users@tomcat.apache.org

RE: RE: failure notice UNSUBSCRIBE IS NOT WORKING !!!!

2005-11-17 Thread cknell
At the bottom of this message is the email address to unsubscribe. It is not the address to which you sent your message. Send an email to the correct address and you will get the results you are looking for. -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email-Original Message-From: Bovy, Stephe