On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 13:43 +, David Cassidy wrote:
> try netbeans
> its free and the profiler will watch all your objects being created.
> it will also work with snapshots...
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:56 +0200, Juha Laiho wrote:
> > Scott McClanah
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 09:23 -0500, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Database connections grow after redeploy
> >
> > Some times our exchange server really mangles e-mails or out right
> > blocks th
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:02 -0400, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chuck,
>
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> |> From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> Subject: Re: Database connections grow after
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 14:31 -0400, Scott McClanahan wrote:
> We are using the dbcp capabilities of tomcat and configured the
> datasource in the applications context configuration file. In a few
> simple tests we've seen some unexpected behavior and aren't sure if it'
We are using the dbcp capabilities of tomcat and configured the
datasource in the applications context configuration file. In a few
simple tests we've seen some unexpected behavior and aren't sure if it's
an error on our part. We are running tomcat 5.5.26 with the
compatibility libraries on java
Is there any difference between an undeploy and a stop of a web
application other than the fact that an undeploy removes the application
contents from the file system? Is there any type of additional clean up
of sessions or objects that occur during an undeploy that don't occur
during a stop of a
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 17:51 -0500, Martin Gainty wrote:
> Scottcan you confirm these JKMount directives in $APACHE_HOME/conf/httpd.conf
>
> # send all requests ending in .jsp to ajp13JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
> # send all requests ending /servlet to ajp13JkMount /*/servlet/ ajp13
> ThanksMartin _
I'm getting 404 errors when I try to access the jkmanager page. There
is only one backend tomcat instance and no load balancing configuration
at all. I was just wanting to see the UI and if it had changed at all
with the upgrade. Do you now get 404's if you don't have a load
balancing configurat
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:16 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: jdbc connection pooling
> >
> > I'm going to try my best to not sound ignorant but can you better
> > explain what you mea
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:23 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: jdbc connection pooling
> >
> > The developer says that the jar file containing the
> > database driver should be published within the
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 14:12 -0200, Diego wrote:
> I'm using the connection pooling on Tomcat 6.
>
> And in my case i had to put the jar from the jdbc driver on.
>
> $CATALINA_HOME/lib
>
> On Jan 4, 2008 2:05 PM, Scott McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
&
We are about to start testing the jdbc connection pooling capabilities
within tomcat. I don't have any control over the application instead
perform only administrative duties. Between the developers and myself
we have done a good bit of research and mapped out a decent plan but
there is one unres
This mailing list is always so helpful and I REALLY appreciate it.
Mainly I enjoy your responses Chuck because they include such helpful
links, commentary, and almost always the right answer. But you're such
a hard ass about it! Always makes me laugh like crazy. Thanks bud!
Sorry for clutteri
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 08:12 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Eric B. wrote:
> > I have submitted the bug & patch to Bugzilla
> > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44021). However, I am
> > not 100% sure that my patch is in the right format/etc. Can you take a
> > quick look at it
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 16:51 -0400, nyronian wrote:
>
> To put it simply, I would like to use the manager to deploy an app
> just like
> auto-deployment works but I need to change the context (path) without
> changing the name of the war.
>
> I am trying to implement the following deployment requi
Is there a way to have the manager web application just upload a .war
and not deploy it? Or a way to have it upload a .war to a location
outside of the appBase?
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscr
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 18:58 +0100, Pid wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > useNaming does not affect here, correct.
> >
> > What's the reason ignoring the path attribute? (6.0.14 ignores as well)
>
> Because it's only used when the context is defined in server.xml and the
> path c
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 11:09 -0500, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Derek Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Using manager to deploy with path="/123/456/789"
> >
> > I want to use the manager to deploy an app with the context
> > path like /123/456/789
>
> Can't say I know ho
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 05:28 -0400, Matthew Whittaker-Williams wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 July 2007 11:02, ben short wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to configure tomcat to not start a specific webapp when
> > it starts up?
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > ---
I know this is a tomcat mailing-list but I'm just curious if anybody has
used tomcat with terracotta. How well do the features of session
replication and the idea of a "distributed" jvm pan out. Just curious
if anybody has done it and how they feel about it.
I'd be running tomcat 5.5.23 and sun'
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:40 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Scott McClanahan wrote:
> > Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of
> > helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk.
> >
> >> That one, reply_timeout, is not re
+ "'"
> " With filter expression '" + filter + "'"
>
> " retrieving attribute " + attrId
>
> " retrieving values for attribute " + attrId
>
>
> debug > 3
>
> " Searching for " + username
Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of
helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk.
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> > I thoroughly enjoyed the updated docs. It is just what I needed. I
> > just want to mention a few
I've inherited a tomcat 5.0.28 server setup to use ldap as an
authentication realm. In the server.xml I see this:
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about
> timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can
> already look at it under
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/
>
>
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about
> timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can
> already look at it under
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/
>
>
I am installing mod_jk 1.2.23 in a load balancing configuration between
apache 2.0.52 and tomcat 5.0.28. I am trying to understand how the
mod_jk error detection actually works. In the documentation
"socket_timeout" directive defaults to zero (infinite waiting) but the
"retries" directive default
27 matches
Mail list logo
