RE: Question on FORM POST processing via AJP1.3 in tomcat 1.0.69, changed from 1.014.

2017-03-28 Thread Scott, Derric T
> Also, possibly, somewhere between Tomcat 7.0.14 and 7.0.69, the AJP Connector > code in Tomcat has been modified, perhaps > to reject POST's with no content. > (In an intended or unintended way; after all, POSTs with no content aren't > exactly your standard thing, and could even be > forbidde

RE: Question on FORM POST processing via AJP1.3 in tomcat 1.0.69, changed from 1.014.

2017-03-28 Thread Scott, Derric T
> On this list, it is preferred to not top-post, ... No problem. > There are 2 different modules in Apache httpd which can be used for this : > mod_jk and mod_proxy_ajp. > Which one are you using, and can you give us a version? OK... I inherited this, so don't know much about it ... but I don

RE: Question on FORM POST processing via AJP1.3 in tomcat 1.0.69, changed from 1.014.

2017-03-28 Thread Scott, Derric T
] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 4:11 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Question on FORM POST processing via AJP1.3 in tomcat 1.0.69, changed from 1.014. On 27.03.2017 23:03, Scott, Derric T wrote: > Hello: > > A question, perhaps a bug... > > I inherited a large application

Question on FORM POST processing via AJP1.3 in tomcat 1.0.69, changed from 1.014.

2017-03-27 Thread Scott, Derric T
Hello: A question, perhaps a bug... I inherited a large application that has Apache in front, tomcat in back via AJP1.3. I am moving everything to "new" verisons. A new RedHat OS, newest tomcat RPM (7.0.69), etc. I ran into a snag and finally identified the culprit. The tomcat on the backe