Re: All threads are busy

On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 12:15 +0100, Rainer Frey wrote: > On Monday 24 November 2008 16:15:19 Martin Spinassi wrote: > > Hi to all again! > > > Nov 24, 2008 1:51:54 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool > > logFull > > SEVERE: All threads (200) are cur

RE: All threads are busy

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 09:33 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > > From: Martin Spinassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: All threads are busy > > > > I should get the same errors using ports 80 or 8080, and I get > > completely different results

RE: All threads are busy

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 09:19 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > > From: Martin Spinassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: All threads are busy > > > > Nov 24, 2008 1:51:54 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool > > logFull > > SEVERE: All threa

All threads are busy

Hi to all again! I keep working on some performance on tomcat and apache, but there is something that I can't figure out. Using jmeter to do the tests, connecting to port 80 (tomcat), I get the next error at catalina.out: Nov 24, 2008 1:51:54 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool logFu

Re: Connectors and apache with mpm worker

On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 19:10 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > Martin Spinassi schrieb: > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:12 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > >> remove this > >> > >> worker.maintain=30 > >> worker.worker1.connection_pool_size=1 > &g

Re: Connectors and apache with mpm worker

On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:12 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > remove this > > worker.maintain=30 > worker.worker1.connection_pool_size=1 > > > for now, and just accept the defaults > > Filip > Wow!! That just made the trick! Please, can you explain me how those changes affects? Th

Re: Connectors and apache with mpm worker

On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 19:56 +0100, André Warnier wrote: > Martin Spinassi wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > > > > > I'm doing some performance tests under apache and tomcat using jakarta > > connectors. > > > > Searching around, I've read

Connectors and apache with mpm worker

Hi everyone! I'm doing some performance tests under apache and tomcat using jakarta connectors. Searching around, I've read about apache-worker (not jakarta), to make it multi-process and multi-thread, but I'm having some troubles with connectors now. Here is the output of jk_mod_log: [error

Problem with connectors

I've been trying to implement apache2 + connectors + tomcat on our servers, put keep having disconnections from connectors and tomcat. Here I post some output from jk_mod_log: own, stopped or network problems (errno=110) [Fri Nov 07 16:32:18.585 2008] [31998:670424352] [error] ajp_get_reply::jk_a

Re: Balance and sync data

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 23:31 +0200, André Warnier wrote: > Martin Spinassi wrote: > [...] > > Martin, > > I re-read the thread from the beginning, and as I understand it you have > - clients that upload files, most of then images > - clients that download these same image

Re: Balance and sync data

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:34 -0700, Hassan Schroeder wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Christopher Schultz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I suppose it depends on the frequency of image uploads. 100 images a day > > wouldn't be too bad. 100 images per minute would seriously suck. > > Tr

RE: Balance and sync data

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:59 -0400, Paul McGurn wrote: > If you're expecting the size of your image store to grow, or better yet, grow > rapidly, you'd be best served to consider a strategy either with > mod_proxy/mod_rewrite, or better yet, looking into a CDN (content delivery > network) to host

Re: Balance and sync data

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:20 +0200, André Warnier wrote: [...] > The question I've been holding back since your initial post, is why > exactly you do want to load-balance similar requests to 2 Tomcats ? > > Just an idea : > > If it is because you have a) "image stuff" and b) "non-image stuff", a

Re: Balance and sync data

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 08:56 -0700, Hassan Schroeder wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Martin Spinassi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Why not have your upload servlet invoke rsync when a new file has > >> been stored? > > > Can you give me s

Re: Balance and sync data

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 07:37 -0700, Hassan Schroeder wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Martin Spinassi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know yet, I didn't try it yet, I was waiting to see if there is > > a better solution than rsync them