Re: mod_jk 1.2.27 and an empty POST

2008-12-01 Thread Henk Fictorie
Mladen Turk-3 wrote: > > Henk Fictorie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think that I've been bitten by a resolved bug in mod_jk 1.2.27. The >> changelog is describing this as: >> >> AJP13: Always send initial POST packet even if the client disconnected &

mod_jk 1.2.27 and an empty POST

2008-11-26 Thread Henk Fictorie
my problem analysis correct - Is this a regression bug - Can I somehow circumvent this (other than not upgrading) regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-1.2.27-and-an-empty-POST-tp20699972p20699972.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list a

RE: With JK 1.2.x using route causes problems with redirect?

2007-09-18 Thread Henk Fictorie
Brian.Horblit wrote: > > > # Set w4 properties > worker.w4.socket_keepalive=1 > worker.w4.socket_timeout=20 > worker.w4.reply_timeout=2 > worker.w4.retries=2 > worker.w4.connection_pool_timeout=60 > worker.w4.type=ajp13 > worker.w4.host=localhost > worker.w4.port=8034 > worker.w4.lbfactor

Re: mod_jk - connectionTimeout en connection_pool_timeout

2007-09-10 Thread Henk Fictorie
l a sticky request for that worker be routed to another worker or will the request fail? regards Henk Henk Fictorie wrote: > > Rainer, > > Thanks for your response. > You mentioned our setting of retries=1, so I reread the documentation to > find out that it actually means &#x

Re: mod_jk - connectionTimeout en connection_pool_timeout

2007-09-06 Thread Henk Fictorie
ner Jung-3 wrote: > > Hi Henk, > > Henk Fictorie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We are using mod_jk 1.2.21 on Solaris 8. together Apache 2.0.59 with the >> worker MPM. >> We are moving our applicationserver to a new version which is also using >> a >> ne

mod_jk - connectionTimeout en connection_pool_timeout

2007-09-06 Thread Henk Fictorie
ionTimeout on the Tomcat side. Probably to some value > (connection_pool_timeout + worker.maintain)?? Or should I set the connection_pool_minsize to match the minSpareThreads?? Or upgrade to mod_jk 1.2.25?? Advice is welcome. regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context: http://w

mod_jk 1.2.21 - minor error in status page

2007-04-05 Thread Henk Fictorie
orker lbworker are missing. The URI mappings for the lbtestworker are displayed correct. I guess the error has something to do with the fact that the lbworker is only JkMounted for the virtualhost where the status worker is not mounted. regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context:

Re: mod_jk - connection_pool_size and connection_pool_minsize

2007-01-30 Thread Henk Fictorie
Mladen Turk wrote: > > Henk Fictorie wrote: >> From reading the documentation I understand that connection_pool_size is >> set >> to its default value, the ThreadsPerChild setting from Apache. >> According to the documentation the connection_pool_minsi

mod_jk - connection_pool_size and connection_pool_minsize

2007-01-30 Thread Henk Fictorie
minimum size for the connection pool and will all connections be freed (after the connection_pool_timeout value)? Or will connections never be freed? Does anyone know? regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk---connection_pool_size-and-connection

RE: JK 1.2.20 - Sticky session doesn't work properly

2007-01-10 Thread Henk Fictorie
ssion route jmv_web1 > * get_most_suitable_worker::jk_lb_worker.c (785): found best worker > jvm_web2 (jvm_web2) using method 'Request' > > It seams the ruote is properly stetted by tomcat, but the loadbalancer > choose the wrong worker. > > Matteo > > -Or

Re: JK 1.2.20 - Sticky session doesn't work properly

2007-01-10 Thread Henk Fictorie
The session cookie is set to .jmv_web1 while your worker is set to jvm_web2. I guess you've go jmv and jvm mixed up. Henk Matteo Turra wrote: > > I upgraded my apache+jk+tomcat configuration with new JK connector > 1.2.20 > > > > My system is one Apache http server and two tomcat runni

Re: Tomcat is sometimes very slow using mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Henk Fictorie
your time. regards Henk Fictorie Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > > I requested this URL a few seconds ago, using > > curl -D - http://www.kpn.com/kpn/show/ > > and it had the header > > Transfer-Encoding: chunked > > set. This somehow contradicts your first mail. >

Re: Tomcat is sometimes very slow using mod_jk

2006-11-23 Thread Henk Fictorie
;t accept compressed responses. So responses are sent uncompressed, but it still passes the mod_deflate filter. regards Henk Fictorie Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > > Hi Henk, do you have a simple app to reproduce the problem? > > Rainer Jung schrieb: >> Hi Henk, >> >> I'

Re: Tomcat is sometimes very slow using mod_jk

2006-11-21 Thread Henk Fictorie
t;JkOptions +FlushPackets" cricumvent this behaviour. - any ideas about the real cause of this problem. Noticable: In our response neither a 'Content-Length' or a 'Transfer-Encoding: chunked' is send, could this be delaying sending the response to the browser? regar

Re: Tomcat is sometimes very slow using mod_jk

2006-11-16 Thread Henk Fictorie
at what moment and from which ip-adres the slow requests are coming. I can then use ethereal to examine the traffic and timing for that particular request. I will report back my findings, but that will take a couple of days. regards Henk Fictorie Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > > Can you reprodu

Tomcat is sometimes very slow using mod_jk

2006-11-15 Thread Henk Fictorie
'JkOptions +FlushPackets' to the apache config help? - can I somehow disable sending the Keep-Alive header to tomcat and will that help? Any ideas/remarks? regards Henk Fictorie -- Configuration info: Apache 2.0.59 JkLogLevel info JkWorkersFile /us

mod_jk - logging the name of the worker

2006-11-13 Thread Henk Fictorie
state Could in the upcoming mod_jk 1.2.20 release this be changed to using the name of the worker also in the Request Logging. regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk---logging-the-name-of-the-worker-tf2621047.html#a7313837 Sent from the Tomcat - Us

mod_jk 1.2.19 worker reference inherentance question

2006-09-28 Thread Henk Fictorie
Hi, In mod_jk 1.2.19 the reference attribute is introduced for a worker. My question is does inherentance work for this attribute. Example: worker.template.activation=D worker.worker1.reference=worker.template worker.worker1.port=18009 worker.worker2.reference=worker.worker1 Will this result

mod_jk.1.2.19 - missing documentation for %R JkRequestLogFormat

2006-09-25 Thread Henk Fictorie
The Changelog mentions: Added %R JkRequestLogFormat option for Apache 1 and Apache 2. (mturk) In the Apache documentation however this new option is not documented. Could somebody explain (and document) what it does? regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context: http