Hi Rainier,
>CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara schrieb:
>> Hi Folks,
>> Wondered if someone could help me with ideas on this?
>>
>> Have a configuration where a separate tomcat instance is installed (So
>> apple can't break it :)). Apple's copy of
>> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5
>>
>> Thanks. I found this:
>> http://commons-daemon.darwinports.com/
>
>Why not look at the real doc?
>http://commons.apache.or
>> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5
>>
>> In OSX, IIRC, there were the usual issues because
>> the ports less than 1024 are reserved for priviledged
>> services
>
&g
>> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5
>>
>> The new Tomcat (5.5.7) plays fine on port 8080.
>
>Why are you using such an old level? That's nearly three years old.
>
>>
Hi Folks,
Wondered if someone could help me with ideas on this?
Have a configuration where a separate tomcat instance is installed (So
apple can't break it :)). Apple's copy of tomcat provided with the
machine in not running. The new Tomcat (5.5.7) plays fine on port 8080.
i.e.
http://localhos
