On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 7:52 AM Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>
> Can you try 8.5.52 and see if that fails as well?---
/me hangs head in shame.
I haven't had time to narrow down what the exact issue is (I suspect
APR), but there's something in the new (8.5.57) Dockerfile that breaks
rewrites for
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:23 PM Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>
> Are you trying to redirect across contexts (from one web application
> to another)? If so, you need to make sure you are actually doing a
> redirect. Your RewriteRules aren't redirecting.
>
> Try the [R] flag.
>
> - -chris
Actually, no
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:51 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
> Minimum steps to recreate the issue with an 8.5.57 install of a standard ASF
> provided distribution?
>
> Mark
>
A minimal example similar to what I'm doing in 8.5.57, the redirects
work as expected.
I'm at a loss as to what configuration
I'm having an issue very similar to this one:
https://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=159171480518941&w=2
The only difference is, I'm upgrading my docker from 8.5.51 to 8.5.57.
My config adds a parameter in the rewrite rule, so I can see in the
access log that the rule is rewriting properly. It just r
on now. But our
performance bottleneck was locks, not stricly CPU load, so YMMV.
FWIW,
Barry Roberts
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vulnerabilities in their updates, and that's all. Fedora
frequently includes new versions in updates that could require
re-testing applications.
Also, if you ever did need top-notch support you could buy it for
CentOS, or a switch to RedHat would be trivial. Sometimes that can
t had
happened and then gone away (no re-start of tomcat). The output of
that lsof re-directed to a file has 693495 lines, 437382 of which
match 10818 according to grep. I'm trying to figure out if and why
tomcat is using all these file handles. Or if I'm just
mis-interpreting ls
