Correcting typo in fixed versions
CVE-2025-53506 Apache Tomcat - DoS in HTTP/2
Severity: High
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 11.0.0-M1 to 11.0.8
Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.42
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.106
Description:
An uncontrolled resource
Correcting typo in fixed versions
CVE-2025-52520 Apache Tomcat - DoS in multipart upload
Severity: Low
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 11.0.0-M1 to 11.0.8
Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.42
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.106
Description:
For some unlikel
Mark,
Is this accurate?
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.42
Mitigation:
- Upgrade to Apache Tomcat 10.1.32 or later
Thanks!
-Joey
[cid:d114c52d-730d-4ed5-9b19-db4e930e1068]
Joey Cochran
Systems Administrator II
Middleware Developer
Information Technology Di
CVE-2025-53506 Apache Tomcat - DoS in HTTP/2
Severity: High
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 11.0.0-M1 to 11.0.8
Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.42
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.106
Description:
An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability if an HTT
CVE-2025-52520 Apache Tomcat - DoS in multipart upload
Severity: Low
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 11.0.0-M1 to 11.0.8
Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.42
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.106
Description:
For some unlikely configurations of multipart uploa
CVE-2025-49125 Apache Tomcat - APR/Native Connector crash leading to DoS
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.105
Description:
A race condition on connection close could trigger a JVM crash when
using the APR/Native connec
Hrvoje,
On 7/10/25 6:52 AM, Hrvoje Lončar wrote:
Currently it's 10.1.39 as I wanted to avoid 10.1.42 but I get the same
unpredictable behaviour from both.
Oh, that's interesting. Of course, upon your first report I had assumed
it was the "maxPartCount" but then you posted your configuration w
Hi!
Currently it's 10.1.39 as I wanted to avoid 10.1.42 but I get the same
unpredictable behaviour from both.
I had 10.1.39 for some time before upgrading to 10.1.42 but no one reported
that form is not working which is not a proof that it was working correctly.
Thanks for your time!
BR,
Hrvoje.