Re: Tomcat 9 won't start according to Eclipse

2017-08-02 Thread Roparzh Hemon
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2017-07-28 20:51 GMT+03:00 Roparzh Hemon : >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Konstantin Kolinko >> wrote: >>> >>> Double click on the server (in "Servers" view) -> set "[x] Publish >>> module context to separate XML files". >> Whe

RE: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Igal @ Lucee.org [mailto:i...@lucee.org] > Subject: Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443 > I agree about the "one more thing to go wrong", but fronting Tomcat with > a Web Server gives a performance hit? I mean, sure, now requests for > Tomcat have another step to go through, but all o

Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread Igal @ Lucee.org
Chris, On 8/2/2017 3:10 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: On 8/2/17 3:13 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: On 8/2/2017 11:48 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: I recommend fronting Tomcat with a web server like nginx or httpd, This is an okay solution but it requires another component to be installed/conf

Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread James H. H. Lampert
With a little futzing around, setting up 443 as an authbind-able port, and (as Christopher noted) correcting the spelling in the pathname, the AUTHBIND option worked perfectly. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Now that I think about it, I don't think any of the Linux installation

Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Igal, On 8/2/17 3:13 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > On 8/2/2017 11:48 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>> From: James H. H. Lampert [mailto:jam...@touchtonecorp.com] >>> Subject: Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443 Binding on ports < 1024 on L

Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread Igal @ Lucee.org
On 8/2/2017 11:48 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: James H. H. Lampert [mailto:jam...@touchtonecorp.com] Subject: Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443 Binding on ports < 1024 on Linux require elevated permissions, no? If so, somebody please elaborate. That's a Linux restriction/feature -

RE: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: James H. H. Lampert [mailto:jam...@touchtonecorp.com] > Subject: Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443 > > Binding on ports < 1024 on Linux require elevated permissions, no? > If so, somebody please elaborate. That's a Linux restriction/feature - must be superuser to use the low port num

Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 8/2/17, 11:26 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: On 8/2/2017 11:13 AM, James H. H. Lampert wrote: I've just got finished moving a Tomcat instance's HTTPS connector from 8443 to 443, on a Google Compute Engine Debian instance (from Bitnami's canned Trac image). Something I've done literally dozens of

Re: This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread Igal @ Lucee.org
On 8/2/2017 11:13 AM, James H. H. Lampert wrote: I've just got finished moving a Tomcat instance's HTTPS connector from 8443 to 443, on a Google Compute Engine Debian instance (from Bitnami's canned Trac image). Something I've done literally dozens of times on AS/400s, along with the occasional

This is weird: can't bind to 443

2017-08-02 Thread James H. H. Lampert
I've just got finished moving a Tomcat instance's HTTPS connector from 8443 to 443, on a Google Compute Engine Debian instance (from Bitnami's canned Trac image). Something I've done literally dozens of times on AS/400s, along with the occasional WinDoze and Linux box. Always without incident.

Re: [OT] question regarding Apache mailservers

2017-08-02 Thread Mark Thomas
On 02/08/17 16:07, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote: > Hi. > Sorry to post this here, but I don't seem to find the right contact > address through the website nor received emails, so if someone could > point me to the right thing.. > > I am being bombarded by some scammers, through my Tomcat committer

[OT] question regarding Apache mailservers

2017-08-02 Thread tomcat
Hi. Sorry to post this here, but I don't seem to find the right contact address through the website nor received emails, so if someone could point me to the right thing.. I am being bombarded by some scammers, through my Tomcat committer email address, no doubt scraped from some page here. Do

Re: Tomcat 8 slow shutdown on Windows 10

2017-08-02 Thread Mark Thomas
On 02/08/17 14:57, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 8/1/17 4:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Yes. To unlock the *acceptor thread(s)*. >>> >>> (Emphasis mine) >>> >>> I understand, now. Thanks. > >> The acceptor is also unlocked when a Connector is paused (i.e. when >> the server socket is

Re: Tomcat 8 slow shutdown on Windows 10

2017-08-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 8/1/17 4:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> Yes. To unlock the *acceptor thread(s)*. >> >> (Emphasis mine) >> >> I understand, now. Thanks. > > The acceptor is also unlocked when a Connector is paused (i.e. when > the server socket is NOT clo

Re: Tomcat 9 won't start according to Eclipse

2017-08-02 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2017-07-28 20:51 GMT+03:00 Roparzh Hemon : > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Konstantin Kolinko > wrote: >> >> Eclipse by default places element for web application into >> Tomcat's server.xml file. >> This is a discouraged practice. A result of such configuration is that >> when the application