Re: JVM Crash in tcnative due to concurrency/timing in HTTP/2

2017-06-12 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2017-06-12 17:07 GMT-05:00 Mark Thomas : > On 09/06/17 16:02, Kreuser, Peter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry for the long text. I hope somebody can help me track down the > problem I'm facing with Tomcat (8.5.15), tcnative (1.2.12), openssl > (1.1.0e) and HTTP/2. JVM is zulu-8.21.0.1 (1.8.0_131-b

Re: JVM Crash in tcnative due to concurrency/timing in HTTP/2

2017-06-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/06/17 16:02, Kreuser, Peter wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the long text. I hope somebody can help me track down the problem > I'm facing with Tomcat (8.5.15), tcnative (1.2.12), openssl (1.1.0e) and > HTTP/2. JVM is zulu-8.21.0.1 (1.8.0_131-b11) No need to apologise. There was enough inf

Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies

2017-06-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 6/12/17 3:43 PM, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote: > Sure, I'll check it out and get back. But the last time I tried, > JMeter gave me better numbers than ab. Don't want the client to be > the bottleneck. +1 ab evidently doesn't "do" high-concurrenc

RE: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies

2017-06-12 Thread Piyush Kumar Nayak
Sure, I'll check it out and get back. But the last time I tried, JMeter gave me better numbers than ab. Don't want the client to be the bottleneck. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:05 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: T

RE: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies

2017-06-12 Thread Piyush Kumar Nayak
Mark, I apologize for not bringing this up before, but is that BIO vs NIO or BIO with executor vs NIO with executor? Thanks again, for looking into this. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 12:30 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: R

Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies

2017-06-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/06/17 20:27, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote: > Thanks, Mark. > I have been testing with 100 concurrent users. While the executor had the > maxThreads set to 150, the connector without the executor was left to the > default value (which should be 200). I did not have the > disableKeepAlivePercent

RE: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies

2017-06-12 Thread Piyush Kumar Nayak
Thanks, Mark. I have been testing with 100 concurrent users. While the executor had the maxThreads set to 150, the connector without the executor was left to the default value (which should be 200). I did not have the disableKeepAlivePercentage attribute set, which means that it should take to