On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:knobis...@googlemail.com]
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat uses 99% of CPU - Something to do with AJP connector
>
>> From a technical point of view - yes. But from experience I can tell
>> that you there are IT or
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:knobis...@googlemail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat uses 99% of CPU - Something to do with AJP connector
> From a technical point of view - yes. But from experience I can tell
> that you there are IT organisations out there that have really weird
> policies. So "upgra
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Dharamshila Khandelwal [mailto:dharmshil...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat uses 99% of CPU - Something to do with AJP connector
>
>> I cannot upgrade Tomcat because we upgraded last year.
>
> Now that is a completely bogus r
https://owasp.org/index.php/HttpOnly#Using_Java_to_Set_HttpOnly
enjoy
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:27 AM, N.s.Karthik wrote:
> Hi
>
> Spec
> JDK1.6
> Tomcat 6.0.10
> O/s Win / Linux(r-Hat)
> Browser : Crome 19.0.x / IE8
>
> For some specific Reason We use Tomcat 6.0.10 for Dev/Deploy in INTRANET.
Hi
Spec
JDK1.6
Tomcat 6.0.10
O/s Win / Linux(r-Hat)
Browser : Crome 19.0.x / IE8
For some specific Reason We use Tomcat 6.0.10 for Dev/Deploy in INTRANET.
I have Googled / Yahooed for the same. "HttpOnly"
1 form suggested to use Filters and set Cookie Headers as alternative for
Handling "Ht
On 6/10/2012 1:49 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Kiran Badi wrote:
Any feedback on apache james ?
I've never used it, so I can't comment. What I would ask is: why are
you are specifically looking for a Java-based mail server?
I was looking for open source server ,capable for serving atleast 5k
ma
> The solution was to 1) set acceptCount to a higher value in Tomcat and 2) to
> configure my OS to allow applications to specify longer accept queues. That
> last step was the one missing. I had changed acceptCount before, but since
> the OS was limiting the accept queue length I did not see an
> From: Dharamshila Khandelwal [mailto:dharmshil...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat uses 99% of CPU - Something to do with AJP connector
> I cannot upgrade Tomcat because we upgraded last year.
Now that is a completely bogus reason.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR
Hi Konstantin,
I cannot upgrade Tomcat because we upgraded last year.
I will do a thread dump when it slows down next time.
However, I still need answers to AJP connection time out.
Thanks,
DS.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/6/11 Dharamshila Khandelwal :
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge,
On 6/11/12 3:01 PM, Jorge Medina wrote:
> There is not much running in the machine other than Tomcat. The JVM
> actually starts fine, using about 8GB (6GB of heap, + code +
> threads etc) but it keeps growing. In about 2 days it runs out of
>
> From: Jorge Medina [mailto:cerebrotecnolog...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Java process killed by oom-killer in Ubuntu
> The JVM actually starts fine, using about 8GB (6GB of heap, + code +
> threads etc) but it keeps growing. In about 2 days it runs out of
> memory. (The JVM process has reached m
There is not much running in the machine other than Tomcat.
The JVM actually starts fine, using about 8GB (6GB of heap, + code +
threads etc) but it keeps growing. In about 2 days it runs out of
memory. (The JVM process has reached more than 15GB).
-Jorge
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Caldara
> From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
> Subject: Re: Java process killed by oom-killer in Ubuntu
> On 6/11/2012 2:30 PM, Jorge Medina wrote:
> > The machine has 16 GB of memory with no swap space.
> > The JVM was being started with -Xms and -Xmx equal to 6 GB, so I think
> > 10GB ext
On 6/11/2012 2:30 PM, Jorge Medina wrote:
The machine has 16 GB of memory with no swap space.
The JVM was being started with -Xms and -Xmx equal to 6 GB, so I think
10GB extra would be enough for anything else.
Does Xms/Xmx memory need to be contiguous? If so, maybe it just can't
find a big-
The machine has 16 GB of memory with no swap space.
The JVM was being started with -Xms and -Xmx equal to 6 GB, so I think
10GB extra would be enough for anything else.
-Jorge
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Jorge Medina [mailto:cerebrotecnolog...@gmail.com
> From: Jorge Medina [mailto:cerebrotecnolog...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Java process killed by oom-killer in Ubuntu
> Nevertheless, I am finding that after removing the -Xms option, the
> process memory usage stabilizes and stops growing.
That would seem to indicate that your -Xmx value is sim
I found this interesting article about how Linux handles requests for
memory, look at section "9.6 Overcommit and OOM":
http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/lk/lk-9.html
I verified that our system runs with overcommit_memory = 0 and
overcommit_ratio = 50. Which are the default values.
This post sugges
I'm finding it hard to believe, but all points that the problem was
the -Xms option of the Oracle (Sun) JVM.
I originally set it to the same value as -Xmx, so that all memory for
the heap is allocated when the JVM starts.
This works fine in Solaris, but it is not working in Ubuntu.
After removing t
2012/6/11 Dharamshila Khandelwal :
> Hi,
>
> I use a combination of tomcat (version 6.0.32) and apache (version 2.2.17)
> connected by mod_proxy_ajp connector.
> The website starts responding slow all of a sudden and I see that tomcat
> process uses 99% of the CPU.
> At the same time I see the foll
Hi,
I use a combination of tomcat (version 6.0.32) and apache (version 2.2.17)
connected by mod_proxy_ajp connector.
The website starts responding slow all of a sudden and I see that tomcat
process uses 99% of the CPU.
At the same time I see the following in apache error_log:
[Sun Jun 10 00:20:36
On 11/06/2012 10:31, burghard.britzke wrote:
> But it for in common the El-Resolver should be able to convert the 'w' into a
> java.lang.Long in this case.
> May be this is an issue with Tomcat 7.0.27?
> Should somebody (may be I) file this at https://issues.apache.org/ ?
No. There is no bug here
But it for in common the El-Resolver should be able to convert the 'w' into a
java.lang.Long in this case.
May be this is an issue with Tomcat 7.0.27?
Should somebody (may be I) file this at https://issues.apache.org/ ?
Sincerly,
burghard.britzke
Am 11.06.2012 um 11:22 schrieb burghard.britzke:
Thank you!
your tip did it. I changed the property type to string because 119 is more
ambigous than 'w' in this case.
Sincerly,
burghard.britzke
Am 11.06.2012 um 09:58 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko:
> 2012/6/11 burghard.britzke :
>> with tomcat 7.0.27, primefaces 3.3, myfaces 2.1.17, weld 1.1.8
>>
2012/6/11 burghard.britzke :
> with tomcat 7.0.27, primefaces 3.3, myfaces 2.1.17, weld 1.1.8
>
> for the jsf-source
> Line 56: Line 57: value="/images/#{personenBean.aktuellePerson.geschlecht eq 'w' ?
> 'fe':''}male.png">
> Line 58:
>
> and the bean
> public class Person implements Serializa
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: 10. juni 2012 22:51
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Removing Ref to YourKit in TC
André Warnier wrote:
> Jerry Malcolm wrote:
>> Thanks, Kostantin, for the pointer. The fix was trivial. Open
>> Regedit, search for
25 matches
Mail list logo
