RE: Isapi redirector log file is always empty - IIS 7.5 - Tomcat 7.0.26 - Isapi 1.2.30 - Win2008 R2

2012-05-20 Thread Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
Pretty sure if you look back in the mailing list logs, I asked the same question :) A -Original Message- From: ann ramos [mailto:ramos_mary...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, 21 May 2012 1:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Isapi redirector log file is always empty - IIS 7.5 - Tomcat 7.

Re: Isapi redirector log file is always empty - IIS 7.5 - Tomcat 7.0.26 - Isapi 1.2.30 - Win2008 R2

2012-05-20 Thread ann ramos
Alex, you're a life-saver. I checked my set up and I noticed that SERVICE is not included in the list of users with read/write access. I added them and now my isapi log file is not empty anymore. Thanks heaps for your "silly question".   Thanks to everyone who has spent time looking at my proble

RE: Isapi redirector log file is always empty - IIS 7.5 - Tomcat 7.0.26 - Isapi 1.2.30 - Win2008 R2

2012-05-20 Thread Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
Silly question but does IIS have write permissions to the directory where you are writing the isapi log ? A -Original Message- From: ann ramos [mailto:ramos_mary...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, 21 May 2012 9:19 AM To: Tomcat Users List; Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Isapi redirector log fi

Re: Isapi redirector log file is always empty - IIS 7.5 - Tomcat 7.0.26 - Isapi 1.2.30 - Win2008 R2

2012-05-20 Thread ann ramos
Sorry about that. So here's what I did.  I created a webapps folder for our application in Tomcat.  We're using IIS as the webserver, used the isapi redirector to make IIS and Tomcat interact.  Followed the steps here:  http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/iis.html So everyt

RE: Tomcat 4.0 & Tomcat 6.0 AuthenticatorBase

2012-05-20 Thread Sekar, Vasanth
Thanks Mark. Sorry, was just an oversight. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 1:21 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0 & Tomcat 6.0 AuthenticatorBase On 18/05/2012 00:43, Sekar, Vasanth wrote: > Good evening Mark, > Th