On 03/26/2012 12:32 AM, Tom Donovan wrote:
The Windows connector 1.2.35 binaries for httpd-2.4 at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/
appear to have been built with the wrong httpd Module Magic Number: 20120109.
The startup error message is:
Module "mod_jk.c
Why would you want to use a future?
Say in a web application, I can't really think of a reason why I would use
the future (asych) connection retrieval pattern. The # of connections is
always fixed, I guess in a very high traffic environment where the # of
connections is the pool are used up, cal
2012/3/26 S Ahmed :
> Is the jdbc pool somehow married to tomcat or can I use it with other
> containers potentially? (
1. You certainly can use it with other containers.
But it depends on Tomcat version of logging library (That is
tomcat-juli.jar). You have to copy that jar as well.
>> http://
The Windows connector 1.2.35 binaries for httpd-2.4 at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/
appear to have been built with the wrong httpd Module Magic Number: 20120109.
The startup error message is:
Module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this version
On 22/03/2012 20:46, bfinkel...@aaamissouri.com wrote:
> New Question that is related to the bin folder:
>
> I extracted the missing items from the bin. and restarted and now Tom cat
> won't load any JSP's. It will load servlets...just not jsp's
>
> getting the following error:
>
> It's throwi
> -Original Message-
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Sent: Monday, 26 March 2012 8:47 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: chunked encoding
>
> On 25/03/2012 08:54, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> >>
> >> 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunked_transfer_enco
On 25/03/2012 08:54, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>
>> 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunked_transfer_encoding
>> 2. RFC 2616 (the specification of HTTP/1.1 protocol)
> Thanks, I had also hoped to get a bit of debate on the !experimental! nature
> of it in the connector
What ma
Pid
Worked like a champ. Thank you once again.
Brian
On 3/25/2012 2:40 AM, Pid * wrote:
On 25 Mar 2012, at 06:25, Brian Hand wrote:
Hello all
I been working with getting JMX working with SSL with client side authentication working
on tomcat. All is working well in this regard. However,
On 23 Mar 2012, at 15:26, Serdyn du Toit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using Tomcat 6.0.35 I got the server up and running and could retrieve
> webpages from my application perfectly - using the browser. Now I've
> written some client code of my own in Java and for one or other reason it
> doesn't want to re
[snip]
>
> 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunked_transfer_encoding
> 2. RFC 2616 (the specification of HTTP/1.1 protocol)
Thanks, I had also hoped to get a bit of debate on the !experimental! nature
of it in the connector
How does it affect compression. So I presume the chunking is between
On 25 Mar 2012, at 03:10, "Terence M. Bandoian" wrote:
> On 1:59 PM, Pid * wrote:
>> On 23 Mar 2012, at 21:59, David Kerber wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote:
> On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: D
On 25 Mar 2012, at 04:03, Huanyuan Sheng wrote:
> When I run the application the server gives the following error:
>
> javax.mail.Session cannot be cast to javax.mail.Session.
>
> No email is sent.
This is usually indicative of a classpath error - meaning that you
have the class specified in tw
On 25 Mar 2012, at 06:25, Brian Hand wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I been working with getting JMX working with SSL with client side
> authentication working on tomcat. All is working well in this regard.
> However, I noticed that if I do a "ps -ef | grep jsvc" on the Cent OS linux
> server. I get
13 matches
Mail list logo
