2011/9/8 Jesse Farinacci :
> PING! I also suffer from this but was previously too ashamed to ask.
>
> :sigh:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1164569&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>> Hi, I'm using
PING! I also suffer from this but was previously too ashamed to ask.
:sigh:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> Hi, I'm using Tomcat 7.0.14 on Ubuntu Linux and wanted to make the logging
> in the logs/catalina.out file more detailed than INFO. So I adjusted the
> $CATALINA_HOME
Christopher Schultz wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Mark,
>
>On 9/7/2011 6:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> Yes. You haven't read the docs and you are using the wrong name
>> for the attribute. Try reading this:
>>
>http://tomcat.apache.org/t
I have always worked hard for what I wanted I was sure I had reached a dead
end this completely exceeded my expectations.http://208.112.68.178/StuartBennett33.html";>http://208.112.68.178/StuartBennett33.html
this is proof that miracles do exist consider trying it for yourself
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 9/7/2011 6:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Am I missing something?
>
> Yes. You haven't read the docs and you are using the wrong name
> for the attribute. Try reading this:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/ajp.html#Common_Attr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Amit,
On 9/7/2011 2:30 PM, Anand, Amit (Contractor) wrote:
> Kinda new to tomcat but have a couple quick questions which came
> up regarding CVE-2011-3109 (Bug 51698).
>
> Any timeline to when stable release of 6.0.34 is supposed to be
> released?
On 07/09/2011 23:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> TC 7.0.20, httpd 2.2.16, mod_jk 1.2.30
>
> I was trying to set up a "secret" for use with my AJP connector and
> I got these two warnings:
>
> Sep 7, 2011 6:09:20 PM
> org.apache.catalina.startup.SetAllPropertiesRule begin WARNING:
> [S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
TC 7.0.20, httpd 2.2.16, mod_jk 1.2.30
I was trying to set up a "secret" for use with my AJP connector and I
got these two warnings:
Sep 7, 2011 6:09:20 PM
org.apache.catalina.startup.SetAllPropertiesRule begin
WARNING: [SetAllPropertiesRule]{S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anjib,
On 9/7/2011 12:57 PM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
>
>>> I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me.
>>> Following is the content:
>>>
>>> >> antiJARLocking="true" docBase="C:\Users\amulepati\My
>>> Projects\ClientDAOTest\build\web" pa
On 07/09/2011 20:36, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
> Sorry, no real difference.
>
> Even worse, I'm on my home computer and here I don't see anymore the *5
> difference between simple tags and classic tags.
The figures I saw were:
TestOP Me Cached
tagfile 500 328 203
classic 100
One more test at home (usin Sun Jdk 1.6.23).
Results are in nanosecond and correspond to generated JSP pages (loop with 1000
iteration is replaced with 1000 tags).
With this test I have simpleTag = 10 * classicTag.
An this ratio is the same in 7.0.21 or in trunk.
trunk
simple = 13461836
[http:
Sorry, no real difference.
Even worse, I'm on my home computer and here I don't see anymore the *5
difference between simple tags and classic tags.
I'll continue these tests tomorrow at work (perhaps there's some file scanning
/ reading in action - and since I'm with AV software...).
- Tests
Ouch, that was fast ! Thanks very much !
Are you willing to build Tomcat 7.0.x from source and see if the new cache
works for you?
-> Of course ! Donno if I'm doing it now or tomorrow morning though - I'm a bit
ill at the moment ;(
sources are in trunk, right ? (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
On 07/09/2011 18:37, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
> Thanks for taking your time to look this issue !
Adding a cache for annotation scanning (that was taking most of the
time) was relatively simple. Are you willing to build Tomcat 7.0.x from
source and see if the new cache works for you?
Mark
> - M
All,
Kinda new to tomcat but have a couple quick questions which came up regarding
CVE-2011-3109 (Bug 51698).
Questions:
Any timeline to when stable release of 6.0.34 is supposed to be released?
Also what does "in trunk" specifically mean? Does that mean if I download say
version 6.0.29 as o
Thanks for taking your time to look this issue !
- Mail original -
De : Mark Thomas
À : Tomcat Users List
Cc :
Envoyé le : Mercredi 7 Septembre 2011 19h13
Objet : Re: Performance issue in simpleTags and tagfiles
On 07/09/2011 15:57, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:23 P
On 07/09/2011 15:57, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've noticed a performance difference between classic Tags and simple Tags
>> in Tomcat 7.0.21 (also tested it on 7.0.6 with the same results).
>>
>> Simple tags or tagfiles executi
i change to
and still same problem.
On 9/7/2011 12:31 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anjib,
On 9/7/2011 12:21 PM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me. Following is
the content:
It probably has no beari
I understand it, but it's reasonable to pay 20% CPU more (on code executed on
JSP side - not overall code). Here the difference is *5.
It appears to me a bit more than originally intended, don't you think ?
I'm new on tag files, so perhaps as you said it's just a feature for quick
prototyping o
I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me. Following is
the content:
It probably has no bearing on this particular problem, but the "path"
attribute is illegal here.
Isn't that context path of web applciation is specified with the "path"
attribute.
http://tomcat.apache.org/tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anjib,
On 9/7/2011 12:21 PM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
> I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me. Following is
> the content:
>
> antiJARLocking="true" docBase="C:\Users\amulepati\My
> Projects\ClientDAOTest\build\web" path="/ClientDAOTe
I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me. Following is the
content:
Same config work for Tomcat 7 so I am wondering is there any thing I
have to different/extra in Tomcat 6
Thanks,
Anjib
On 9/7/2011 12:15 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anjib,
On 9/7/2011 11:22 AM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
> Yes I am positive
If you have changed your META-INF/context.xml without doing an
undeploy/redeploy, Tomcat may be using an older version of the
deployment descriptor than you think it is.
Take a l
Yes I am positive
Anjib Man Mulepati
409-225-6216
> Subject: Re: JNDI configuration with 6.0.29
> From: felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:17:21 +0200
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
> Anjib Mulepati schrieb:
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I am trying to setup JNDI
Anjib Mulepati schrieb:
>Hi All,
>
>I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling
>with Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
>
>javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this
>From your code and configuration I would have expected jdbc/dyn
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a performance difference between classic Tags and simple Tags in
> Tomcat 7.0.21 (also tested it on 7.0.6 with the same results).
>
> Simple tags or tagfiles execution is at 5 times superior to classic tag
> executi
Hi All,
I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling with
Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this Context
org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:770)
org.apac
I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling with
Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this Context
org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:770)
org.apache.naming.N
Thanks but that didn't work for me
I've got
in my server.xml
And I've created a SessionTrackingModeListener (just like manual) and
modified web.xml with this listener
And now I finish SSL Session with
session.invalidate();
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SSLSessionManager mgr
=(org.apache.tomcat.
Hello,
I've noticed a performance difference between classic Tags and simple Tags in
Tomcat 7.0.21 (also tested it on 7.0.6 with the same results).
Simple tags or tagfiles execution is at 5 times superior to classic tag
execution.
Classic tag execution is more or less the same than using no ta
On 07/09/2011 12:20, Chema wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I've got a web application running on Tomcat 7.0.16
> It uses realm authentication to validate users ( FORM login method
> with a custom login page named login.html)
> and it's secured by SSL with
>
>
>
> ssl
> /*
>
>
>
Hello:
I've got a web application running on Tomcat 7.0.16
It uses realm authentication to validate users ( FORM login method
with a custom login page named login.html)
and it's secured by SSL with
ssl
/*
CONFIDENTIAL
So, if I write https://localhost:8080/pr
On 06/09/2011 21:11, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling with
> Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
> javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this Context
> org.apache.naming.NamingConte
33 matches
Mail list logo
