On 12/3/10 6:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 18:36, pix_siro wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm working on Ubuntu 9.10, I have implemented a Java application and I have
>> installed it on Tomcat 7.0.4 with a WAR file. When I shut down Tomcat with
>> the command ./shutdown.sh, a java thread remai
On 12/3/10 5:53 PM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
> On 12/03/10 18:05 PM, Pid wrote:
>> So, if you can consistently repeat this, can you also confirm
>> that changing the date of the static error page prevents the
>> 304 from being sent on a subsequent request?
>
> Hello,
>
> when I change the date o
Hi Rodrigo.
As far as I am aware, there is currently no Tomcat 7 debian package tree
being worked on, nor am I currently working on one. I have recently been
discussing the possibility of working on a Tomcat 7 package that goes across
both deb and RPM formats (in an attempt to merge lots of dupli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jordan,
On 12/3/2010 2:56 PM, Jordan Michaels wrote:
> It's what makes me think that the...
>
> sun.net.client.defaultConnectTimeout (default: -1)
> sun.net.client.defaultReadTimeout (default: -1)
>
> settings are involved somehow...
- From the doc
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 03.12.2010 um 20:51 (+0100):
> Michael Ludwig schrieb am 03.12.2010 um 20:31 (+0100):
>
> > networkaddress.cache.ttl
>
> > Wondering myself what the default value is?
> >
> > sun.net.inetaddr.ttl
>
> > So is the "implementation specific period of time" the value ta
On 12/03/2010 11:31 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Moin Jordan,
Jordan Michaels schrieb am 03.12.2010 um 10:39 (-0800):
Would any of you be able to point me to some documentation on how
the JVM handles DNS resolving? I'm hoping there are JVM settings
that can be tweaked to help force the JVM to fa
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 03.12.2010 um 20:31 (+0100):
> Networking Properties
> http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/net/properties.html#nct
>
> networkaddress.cache.ttl
> Wondering myself what the default value is?
>
> sun.net.inetaddr.ttl
> So is the "implementation
Moin Jordan,
Jordan Michaels schrieb am 03.12.2010 um 10:39 (-0800):
> Would any of you be able to point me to some documentation on how
> the JVM handles DNS resolving? I'm hoping there are JVM settings
> that can be tweaked to help force the JVM to fail over to the
> secondary resolver.
>
> I'
On 12/03/2010 11:11 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Jordan Michaels [mailto:jor...@viviotech.net]
Subject: SOT: JVM and DNS Failover
However, the JVM doesn't seem to be doing that. Whenever this name
server goes offline, the application dies because something it's doing
(we didn't write
> From: Jordan Michaels [mailto:jor...@viviotech.net]
> Subject: SOT: JVM and DNS Failover
> However, the JVM doesn't seem to be doing that. Whenever this name
> server goes offline, the application dies because something it's doing
> (we didn't write it) needs to resolve in order for the site
On 03/12/2010 18:36, pix_siro wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm working on Ubuntu 9.10, I have implemented a Java application and I have
> installed it on Tomcat 7.0.4 with a WAR file. When I shut down Tomcat with
> the command ./shutdown.sh, a java thread remains open. Notice that
> application have a con
I have II7 setup with the ISAPI AJP connector and it works just dandy
when using a single worker pointed to a particular tomcat instance. I
now need to use some rewrite functionality so that the following occurs:
http://mydomain.com/sdm => tomcat SDM instance and runs webapp /myapp
http://mydoma
Hey Folks,
I apologize for the slightly off-topic post but I'm having trouble
researching this issue so I figured it might be worthwhile to make a
post where folks more familiar with the intricacies of the JVM might be
able to point me in the right direction.
We have an application running o
Hi all,
I'm working on Ubuntu 9.10, I have implemented a Java application and I have
installed it on Tomcat 7.0.4 with a WAR file. When I shut down Tomcat with
the command ./shutdown.sh, a java thread remains open. Notice that
application have a connection with a postgres db but the connections ar
anyone knows when debian/ubuntu is getting the package for tomcat 7 ??
On 03/12/2010 18:07, Ben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know it got servlet 3.0 support, but does it support websocket handshake n
> bi-direction talk?
No to websocket. It does support comet.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr.
Hi,
I know it got servlet 3.0 support, but does it support websocket handshake n
bi-direction talk?
Tks.
PeiSong
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.a
On 12/03/10 18:05 PM, Pid wrote:
> So, if you can consistently repeat this, can you also confirm
> that changing the date of the static error page prevents the
> 304 from being sent on a subsequent request?
Hello,
when I change the date of the static error page so that it is newer than the
one wh
On 03/12/2010 09:35, André Warnier wrote:
> David Dabbs wrote:
>> Would it provide better performance for AJP connector processing?
>
> Not at all. The comparison you have been pointed to refers to HTTP
> connectors.
> AJP is another (different) protocol, and has a different connector.
The AJP c
On 11/29/10 8:38 PM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
>> At the moment I can't reproduce this issue any more. It happened
>> some days ago, when I was viewing the webapp by Firefox and
>> pressed F5 several times, when I noticed that Firefox sometimes
>> displayed HTTP Headers as plain text. I used a n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
There have been some questions over the past few months about this
topic, and I'd like to let everyone know that there's a patch in the
Trunk to support it:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
Note that the patch allows you
On 3.12.2010 14:53, Nathaniel Thalluri wrote:
I still haven't been able to resolve this issue. Does anyone have any
suggestions?
Provide more details about the problem:
1. If you open your site with e.g. Firefox, and certificate is not
valid, under section "technical details", you will see de
I still haven't been able to resolve this issue. Does anyone have any
suggestions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> Now if I do a GET-Request with an "If-modified-since" header to a file
which
> doesn't exist, Tomcat returns a 302 Not Modified response instead of 404
Not
> Found. I think this is because Tomcat compares the date after the
> "Is-modified-since" header to the date of the static 404 error file, th
Make servlet, start it at context start (load on startup), run thread
and control time :)
On 2.12.2010 22:08, Brian wrote:
Wht I want to do is to call a method inside an object in the same java web app.
Trying to do that from the OS would not be a good solution for me.
-Original Messag
On 12/2/10 11:39 PM, Justin Case wrote:
> But what do you think about the 400
> error? Is it really appropriate as answer in this setup?
Well, 404 might be appropriate from the client's point of view.
I think I remember the recent suggestion of a default ROOT application,
used when no other is p
On 12/3/10 5:23 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/12/3 Bill Wang :
>> Is it possible?
>
> I do not think that it is possible.
>
> Maybe you are running more than 2 tomcat instances (e.g. failed to
> stop some old one properly).
>
>
> Maybe one of them runs with wrong $CATALINA_HOME or wrong
On 12/3/10 9:09 AM, Justin Case wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I see discussions about migration to Tomcat 7. Do you think it is the right
> moment to count your production apps on it? My thought is "no way Jose" but
> maybe I'm missing something...
It's beta, but it's not poor quality. Code /has/ chang
Op vrijdag, 3 december 2010 10:09 schreef Justin Case
:
Hi all,
I see discussions about migration to Tomcat 7. Do you think it is the right
moment to count your production apps on it? My thought is "no way Jose" but
maybe I'm missing something...
Thank you,
JC
The answer probab
David Dabbs wrote:
Would it provide better performance for AJP connector processing?
Not at all. The comparison you have been pointed to refers to HTTP connectors.
AJP is another (different) protocol, and has a different connector.
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale
Hi all,
I see discussions about migration to Tomcat 7. Do you think it is the right
moment to count your production apps on it? My thought is "no way Jose" but
maybe I'm missing something...
Thank you,
JC
-
To unsubs
> From: Markus Schönhaber
>
> Yes, it is an error. But in this case, I, too, consider the error erroneous.
> A status code of 400 basically means that the request was syntactically
> b0rked. But, as I understand it, that's not the problem here: the
> request is syntactically fine - it fails be
32 matches
Mail list logo
