Hi,
I have come across a weird behavior. I defined an additional port for my
tomcat, by adding an additional connector in the server.xml
The connector was placed in the same container, and the only difference was
the new port.
Now, when I connect to my server using the old port (80) - network tim
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 31/08/2010 16:38, abhishek jain wrote:
> > Hey ,
> > I just realized that actually i accidently placed el-api.jar in
> WEB-INF/lib
> > folder.
> > If i dont than i get the following exception:
> >
> >
> > Aug 31, 2010 4:28:44 PM org.apache.
On 1 September 2010 12:10, Mark Eggers wrote:
> Sometimes when I boot into Windows/XP I don't get some icons in the system
> tray.
> I've not seen this happen with the Tomcat monitor, but I have seen this happen
> with the Apache httpd monitor. What I do is bring up the process list, search
> for
Sometimes when I boot into Windows/XP I don't get some icons in the system
tray.
I've not seen this happen with the Tomcat monitor, but I have seen this happen
with the Apache httpd monitor. What I do is bring up the process list, search
for the offending process (would be tomcat7w.exe for you)
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 19:49, Steven Woody wrote:
> If launch "Configure Tomcat": An instance of "Tomcat7" is already running;
> If launch "Monitor Tomcat": An instance of "Tomcat7w" is already running.
Despite the different wording, the meaning is the same: The
Monitor/Configure app is alread
On 01/09/2010 00:49, Steven Woody wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 01:52, Pid wrote:
>> On 31/08/2010 17:16, Steven Woody wrote:
>>> On 31 August 2010 23:48, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
Is something else listening on the port Tomcat wants to use (8080?)?
>>>
>>> I think no. I can open the ht
On 1 September 2010 01:52, Pid wrote:
> On 31/08/2010 17:16, Steven Woody wrote:
>> On 31 August 2010 23:48, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>>> Is something else listening on the port Tomcat wants to use (8080?)?
>>>
>>
>> I think no. I can open the http://localhost:8080/ and get see the
>> tomcat we
> From: Alexandre Chapellon [mailto:alexandre.chapel...@mana.pf]
> Subject: Re: pick load
> We're using an old version of highdeal billing system which
> apparently (tat's what the support says) doens't support java6.
Chris suggested *Tomcat* 6, not Java 6. You can run Tomcat 6 on JRE 5.
- C
Le mardi 31 août 2010 à 14:39 -0400, Christopher Schultz a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alexandre,
>
> On 8/30/2010 10:49 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> > [Considering] the fair analysis of Charles, we decided to move applications
> > to Poolable connection fac
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> Really?
> > JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun)
> You can probably find a newer JVM than that
You're saying that just because 1.6.0_0 is approaching the fourth anniversary
of its release? And even
On 8/31/2010 12:16 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Or, just remove the ThreadLocal manually. Since you know it's name, it
should be easy to remove. There are two obvious ways to remove these
ThreadLocals in a webapp:
1. Modify all the code that uses the iCal4j library so that, after
performing it
On 31/08/2010 20:41, Maximilian Stocker wrote:
> Thanks for you reply.
>
> The JVM bug is an interesting possibility that I have also been wondering
> about. It was also upgraded I believe.
Really?
>> JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun)
You can probably find a newer JVM than that, unless I'm reading your
The whole webapps folder is a symlink. But it has also been so and all the
permission have not changed. Also there are no links inside the extracted WAR
directory.
I just checked this to make sure of my sanity.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys
Thanks for you reply.
The JVM bug is an interesting possibility that I have also been wondering
about. It was also upgraded I believe.
The stack trace is a copy and paste from the log file.
I looked at the source yesterday and it also made no sense to me (why it is
recursing or at least seemin
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> Looks like a JVM bug to me.
Maybe not - see below.
> > And the last line, ExpandWar.delete continues on and on etc.
> That's weird that it would have ExpandWa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maximilian,
On 8/31/2010 2:15 PM, Maximilian Stocker wrote:
> I have a tomcat 5.5 running on a server with redhat enterprise linux
> 5 and everything has been working for the last 7 -8 months without
> problems. On Friday the IT department "patched"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
On 8/31/2010 3:07 PM, Paul Bourget wrote:
> I compared the server.xml file to the one used on the production servers
> and it was the same except for the ip addresses. During bootup I get
> the failure but when I run the "Catalina.sh start" com
> From: Paul Bourget [mailto:paul.bour...@isabellaproducts.com]
> Subject: RE: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
> I compared the server.xml file to the one used on the production
> servers and it was the same except for the ip addresses.
So that just verifies that you've got junk o
I reinstalled tomcat to another directory and it all works fine now :(
Now I'm confused. Its the same zip file I used for tomcat yesterday.
Anyway issues closed for the moment.
Wes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ognjen,
On 8/31/2010 4:51 AM, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote:
Is there no way for me to kill these?
>>>
>>> Not easily. Most uses of ThreadLocal seem to be blissfully
>>> (sometimes arrogantly) unaware of thread-pooling mechanisms and app
>>> servers.
I compared the server.xml file to the one used on the production servers
and it was the same except for the ip addresses. During bootup I get
the failure but when I run the "Catalina.sh start" command, tomcat
starts up fine.
Apache is not running though, so still no web services.
[r...@localhos
On 8/31/2010 1:21 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
It seems to me that using static ThreadLocal's isn't going to
save that much overhead vs. just creating a regular local object
each time you run.
The above is even more true in modern JVMs with method inlining and escape
analysis - such an obje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre,
On 8/30/2010 10:49 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> [Considering] the fair analysis of Charles, we decided to move applications
> to Poolable connection factory
Excellent.
> To do so I created a factory iun server.xml as follow:
>
>
I
> From: Bill Davidson [mailto:bill...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: iCal4j and ThreadLocal
> It seems to me that using static ThreadLocal's isn't going to
> save that much overhead vs. just creating a regular local object
> each time you run.
The above is even more true in modern JVMs with method in
I have a tomcat 5.5 running on a server with redhat enterprise linux 5 and
everything has been working for the last 7 -8 months without problems. On
Friday the IT department "patched"/upgraded the server (I believe both tomcat
and java were moved up minor versions) and now any undeploy fails.
T
On 8/30/2010 9:18 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
There's a lot of baggage implemented to support ThreadLocal. It's one of those
deceptively easy-to-use Java concepts that utilizes a lot of plumbing
underneath the covers (e.g., a specialized per-thread expandable hash map, weak
references).
On 31/08/2010 17:16, Steven Woody wrote:
> On 31 August 2010 23:48, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>> Is something else listening on the port Tomcat wants to use (8080?)?
>>
>
> I think no. I can open the http://localhost:8080/ and get see the
> tomcat welcome page.
OK, so you've already got Tomcat
On 8/31/2010 11:43 AM, Steven Woody wrote:
Hi,
I just installed tomcat 7.0.2 on Windows 7.0.2. But when I tried to
launch the "Configure Tomcat" or "Monitor Tomcat", I always got the
error message: "An Instance of 'Tomcat7' is already running". What's
wrong with that? I tried to stop the tomc
On 31 August 2010 23:48, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> Is something else listening on the port Tomcat wants to use (8080?)?
>
I think no. I can open the http://localhost:8080/ and get see the
tomcat welcome page.
> --
> Jonathan Rosenberg
> Founder & Executive Director, Tabby's Place
> http://ww
Is something else listening on the port Tomcat wants to use (8080?)?
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director, Tabby's Place
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
-Original Message-
From: Steven Woody [mailto:narkewo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:43 AM
To: users@tomca
On 31/08/2010 16:38, abhishek jain wrote:
> Hey ,
> I just realized that actually i accidently placed el-api.jar in WEB-INF/lib
> folder.
> If i dont than i get the following exception:
>
>
> Aug 31, 2010 4:28:44 PM org.apache.catalina.core.
> StandardContext listenerStart
> SEVERE: Error configu
Hi,
I just installed tomcat 7.0.2 on Windows 7.0.2. But when I tried to
launch the "Configure Tomcat" or "Monitor Tomcat", I always got the
error message: "An Instance of 'Tomcat7' is already running". What's
wrong with that? I tried to stop the tomcat service, but the error
did not go away. T
Hey ,
I just realized that actually i accidently placed el-api.jar in WEB-INF/lib
folder.
If i dont than i get the following exception:
Aug 31, 2010 4:28:44 PM org.apache.catalina.core.
StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Error configuring application listener of class
com.sun.faces.config.Conf
hey
I was looking at the tomcat commons lib folder, there is a file called
commons-el.jar
has that something to do with el-api.jar in my WEB-INF/lib folder ?
thanks
abhishek
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:26 PM, abhishek jain
wrote:
> yes, it was originally 2.5, i did tried changing it to 2.4 and o
yes, it was originally 2.5, i did tried changing it to 2.4 and of no use,
thanks for answering but the problem still persists.
abhishek
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Ben Souther wrote:
> Look at the top of your deployment descriptor (web.xml) and see if the
> version is 2.4 or better.
>
>
Look at the top of your deployment descriptor (web.xml) and see if the version
is 2.4 or better.
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:35 AM, abhishek jain wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 31/08/2010 12:52, abhishek jain wrote:
>>> Hi friends,
>>> I have a website in st
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 31/08/2010 12:52, abhishek jain wrote:
> > Hi friends,
> > I have a website in struts 1.2 hosted on tomcat 5.5.x and it uses EL.
> > It is not being evaluated, any suggestions on the reasons why?
>
> http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-quest
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:22 PM, abhishek jain
wrote:
> Hi friends,
> I have a website in struts 1.2 hosted on tomcat 5.5.x and it uses EL.
> It is not being evaluated, any suggestions on the reasons why?
> --
> Thanks and kind Regards,
> Abhishek jain
>
>
i used myeclipse for development, and i
On 31/08/2010 11:30, Jess Holle wrote:
> On 8/31/2010 4:03 AM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Ognjen Blagojevic
>> wrote:
>> Is there no way for me to kill these?
> Not easily. Most uses of ThreadLocal seem to be blissfully (sometimes
> arrogantly) unawar
On 31/08/2010 13:08, Michaël JERUSALMI wrote:
>
> I've been using tomcat for a long time, and so far, i've always been using
> tomcat on a computer with a JDK installed.
> Now,
> i have to deploy a web application using tomcat 6.0 on a virtual
> machine , on which there's no JDK installed, but
On 31/08/2010 12:52, abhishek jain wrote:
> Hi friends,
> I have a website in struts 1.2 hosted on tomcat 5.5.x and it uses EL.
> It is not being evaluated, any suggestions on the reasons why?
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
I've been using tomcat for a long time, and so far, i've always been using
tomcat on a computer with a JDK installed.
Now,
i have to deploy a web application using tomcat 6.0 on a virtual
machine , on which there's no JDK installed, but only a JRE 1.5.
I've tried to put the JAVA_HOME on the JRE
On 31/08/2010 04:38, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Jess Holle [mailto:je...@ptc.com]
>> Subject: Re: iCal4j and ThreadLocal
>
>> Rather replacing all the threads ASAP upon any reload
>> seems like a much more forgiving implementation.
>
> There was an effort underway to do just that a fe
On 31.08.2010 13:14, takanobu watanabe wrote:
Thank you very much Rainer.
Tomcat itself doesn't need much memory and you should be able to run it with
less than 64MB Heap (plus Perm)
I recognized 64MB>= Am + Bm from your advice.
Is my recognized correct ?
---example catalina.sh---
-XX:NewSi
Hi friends,
I have a website in struts 1.2 hosted on tomcat 5.5.x and it uses EL.
It is not being evaluated, any suggestions on the reasons why?
--
Thanks and kind Regards,
Abhishek jain
Thank you very much Rainer.
>Tomcat itself doesn't need much memory and you should be able to run it with
>less than 64MB Heap (plus Perm)
I recognized 64MB >= Am + Bm from your advice.
Is my recognized correct ?
---example catalina.sh---
-XX:NewSize=Am -XX:MaxNewSize=Am
-XX:PermSize=Bm -XX:Ma
On 8/31/2010 4:03 AM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Ognjen Blagojevic
wrote:
Is there no way for me to kill these?
Not easily. Most uses of ThreadLocal seem to be blissfully (sometimes
arrogantly) unaware of thread-pooling mechanisms and app servers. Ideally,
thes
On 31.08.2010 10:34, takanobu watanabe wrote:
Hello,
What is default value of CATALINA_OPTS at apache-tomcat-6.0.29 ?
It means No configure catalina.sh as same as value of CATALINA_OPTS
just expand tomcat.
Because I try to run tomcat lean physical memory condition(128Mb only
with armv5).
When n
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Ognjen Blagojevic
wrote:
Is there no way for me to kill these?
>>>
>>> Not easily. Most uses of ThreadLocal seem to be blissfully (sometimes
>>> arrogantly) unaware of thread-pooling mechanisms and app servers. Ideally,
>>> these ThreadLocal instances would
Is there no way for me to kill these?
Not easily. Most uses of ThreadLocal seem to be blissfully (sometimes
arrogantly) unaware of thread-pooling mechanisms and app servers. Ideally,
these ThreadLocal instances would instead be created in a pool for the webapp
to use, rather than being tied
Hello,
What is default value of CATALINA_OPTS at apache-tomcat-6.0.29 ?
It means No configure catalina.sh as same as value of CATALINA_OPTS
just expand tomcat.
Because I try to run tomcat lean physical memory condition(128Mb only
with armv5).
When nothing configure to catalina.sh(default),Tomcat
2010/8/31 Caldarale, Charles R :
>> From: Steffen Heil [mailto:li...@steffen-heil.de]
>> Subject: AW: OFFTOPIC: Java String problem - possible VM bug
>
>> I just looked at the sun/oracle download page and the most
>> recent jdk there (jdk-6u21-linux-x64.bin) is still the very
>> same I downloaded,
I found the solution. In the services.xml (that I had generated using maven
wsdl2code command) did not have the scope="application". I had noticed it since
the beginning but assumed it won't have any effect. Finally I gave up and
introduced it
And it worked. What a cruel behaviour.
--Kann
53 matches
Mail list logo
