Thanks for your reply Chris. My responses are inline.
> > Shaun,
> >
> > On 7/8/2009 1:35 PM, Shaun Qualheim wrote:
> >>*Tomcat 4.1.27-LE
> >
> > You might consider upgrading at some point. 4.1 is getting ready to be
> > retired, and the 3 (yes 3!) versions since then all have significant
All --
Is there any way that scheme and/or proxyPort attributes in server.xml can add
significantly to processing time? We're noticing that 2 identical servers, 1
that is straight http, and 1 that is behind an ssl offloader with scheme=https
and proxyPort=443 attributes on the connector's el
I setup a JDBC realm by following this document. It took
A bit of fiddling because of errors on my part, but it
Worked, just do exactly what the document says:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/realm-howto.html
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@u
Thanks Christopher,
I'll upgrade to the latest mod_jk and look at the timeout params.
We'll see if that helps.
WILL
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Christopher
Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Will,
>
> On 7/6/2009 4:15 PM, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
>> Interes
> From: d...@maquib.com [mailto:d...@maquib.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 5 JDBCRealm Configuration
>
> I'm new here, and i have a client that is running tomcat 5
> on his server
Be specific; what exact level of Tomcat 5? If you mean 5.0.x, it's no longer
supported, but you can find docs for it with t
Hi there,
I'm new here, and i have a client that is running tomcat 5 on his server
and i cannot find any tutorials on setting up JDBCRealms for users. And as
my application uses them are there any suggestions on how i can set it up
as the web interface doesn't have anything on this. I have develope
Thanks for your detailed answer, I will probably go with in-memory replication.
Regading your last question, I have one database instance sitting on
top of a 2 node DRBD.
2009/6/17 Christopher Schultz :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yves,
>
> On 6/17/2009 6:04 AM, Yves Glod
siom...@portosdobrasil.gov.br wrote:
Andre came up with a good reason and here is mine:
I work for the brazilian government that wants to keep track of people who
download certain specific files. It also wants to send emails to the ones
that at least started the download procces of these files.