Re: Upgrade from mod_jk to mod_proxy_ajp

2007-11-17 Thread Gmail User
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:15:35 -0500, Pid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd suggest that you upgrade to the most recent version of Tomcat 5.5.25, (I think you said you have 5.5.15), as it does contain bug fixes, which may improve matters. I'm not sure who maintains mod_proxy stuff, but you may get b

mod_proxy or mod_jk?

2007-11-17 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Hello. I would like to publish a Web application running under Tomcat. I'm using Apache 2 as Web server. Basically, I have two opportunities: 1) mod_jk 2) mod_proxy I've tried the first. So I discover that I ve: - Create an alias in httpd.conf so that al static pages are processed directly b

Re: Upgrade from mod_jk to mod_proxy_ajp

2007-11-17 Thread Pid
Gmail User wrote: > On Nov 9, 2007 11:19 PM, Gmail User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Any ideas would be appreciated. >> > > Just a follow-up since I never got a reply to this--or Gmail is hiding > replies from me again. > > As I found out, Tomcat always worked and going back to mod_jk on > httpd

Re: Tomcat vs (other container) compatibility

2007-11-17 Thread Gabe Wong
That is more an Application design issue. In short, there are incompatibilities across the various containers. So if you are developing a cross-container application, the simpler it is the more chances of less re-configuration on different containers. However that may be contradictory as more req

Re: Tomcat vs (other container) compatibility

2007-11-17 Thread David Smith
Michael wrote: Johnny Kewl wrote: --- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm Now Tomcat is also a cool pojo application server --- -

Re: Upgrade from mod_jk to mod_proxy_ajp

2007-11-17 Thread Gmail User
On Nov 9, 2007 11:19 PM, Gmail User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > Just a follow-up since I never got a reply to this--or Gmail is hiding replies from me again. As I found out, Tomcat always worked and going back to mod_jk on httpd-2.2.6 side fixed the problem. S

Re: Tomcat vs (other container) compatibility

2007-11-17 Thread Michael
Johnny Kewl wrote: --- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm Now Tomcat is also a cool pojo application server --- - Original Message

Re: Tomcat vs (other container) compatibility

2007-11-17 Thread Wade Chandler
The main point to keep in mind is that Tomcat only implements the Servlet and JSP specifications from JEE, and thus is a Servlet container and is not an EE container. Very important part of the puzzle to keep in mind, so moving from TC to one of the others should be very easy unless of course yo

Re: Tomcat vs (other container) compatibility

2007-11-17 Thread Johnny Kewl
--- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm Now Tomcat is also a cool pojo application server --- - Original Message - From: "Jacob Rhod

Re: Can Tomcat be used as a servlet container for non-http servlets?

2007-11-17 Thread Johnny Kewl
--- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm Now Tomcat is also a cool pojo application server --- - Original Message - From: "Sean Nagle

Tomcat vs (other container) compatibility

2007-11-17 Thread Jacob Rhoden
Hi, Just wondering if there is anyone who has been or is involved in cross JEE container work, how compatible are tomcat apps with other commercial apps such as OC4J, Websphere, BEA and so on? If you don't use tomcat specific things, does it "just work", I ask because the compatibility issue

Re: Can Tomcat be used as a servlet container for non-http servlets?

2007-11-17 Thread Johnny Kewl
--- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm Now Tomcat is also a cool pojo application server --- - Original Message - From: "Sean Nagle

tomcat mod_jk error log

2007-11-17 Thread Marthen LT
hi all, i have a live production server running tomcat & apache under linux. but recently my cpu usage is being consumed by the mod_jk log file. it keep logging and saying below warning/error messages: [Fri Nov 16 15:02:13 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (819)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message