A fix for issue 3471

o please point me right manuals.   Many thanks in advance!   Best regards,   Rick Varney

Re: A fix for issue 3471

Many thanks for the replies on this.  I now feel fully clued in.   Best regards,   Rick

svnshell-like client

uggestions on what to use as a good starting point? Best regards, Rick Varney

Re: svnshell-like client

> on >Mac > > > > > OS X and it worked fine. No need to install additional software. (Though >there > > > would be the need to enable WebDAV on your repository server, if you're not > > already using http to serve the repository.) > > On Jun 8, 2011

Re: svnshell-like client

> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > >> Not quite what you want, but viewvc gives a reasonable way to explore a > >repository (especially remotely) with only a web browser and once you > >understand the layout you can plug the path you need into your normal svn > >client

Problem setting up authz on svnserve

ot the above client error. At this point I'm stuck. Am I doing anything obviously wrong? Any suggestions on how I can debug this? Many thanks! Rick Varney

Re: Problem setting up authz on svnserve

why my svnserve process starting behaving this way, but the problem is resolved for now. I was able to modify my authz file to achieve my current access goals. Many thanks for helping me get unstuck! Best regards, Rick Varney

svn delete removes read-only files

lock becomes more intuitive to users, in the same way locking a file opens up write permissions so a file can be edited. What do you think?  Any alternatives I have not considered?  Should I open a feature request for this? Best regards, Rick Varney

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

Branko Čibej wandisco.com> writes: > I disagree with the behaviour change because it makes 'svn delete' in > the presence of svn:needs-lock behave exactly opposite to every other > command. IMO, it's quite enough to simply fix the bug where we try to > change the permissions on a non-ex

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

Branko Čibej wandisco.com> writes: > > > On 15.11.2013 20:30, Rick Varney wrote: > > > Branko Čibej wandisco.com> writes: > > > > I disagree with the behaviour change because it makes 'svn > >

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

David Chapman acm.org> writes: > > On 11/15/2013 3:57 PM, Rick Varney wrote: > > Branko Čibej wandisco.com> writes: > > > >> > >> It really depends on what you think "Unix rm" actually is. The > >> unlin

Re: svn delete removes read-only files

Branko Čibej wandisco.com> writes: > > Maybe this behavior can be made optional, enabled via the > configuration file? > > Changing client behaviour via config file options is almost always a > bad idea ... every such option makes testing more complex and bug > triag