Hi,
When I do "svn diff file1" on a file that I just added to my working copy since
the last commit, it prints a diff that shows the entire file being added.
However, if I had a file that was added in a previous revision (say 42), and I
try to do "svn diff -c 42 file2", it doesn't work. It gives th
Hi,
If I do "svn cat" on a file, with the svn:keywords property set, it expands out
SVN keywords such as $Date$, $Revision$, $Id$, etc., in the file (the ones there
were included in the svn:keywords property anyway). Is there an option that will
NOT do the expansion? Or is there some other way of u
at file somewhere.
After you create a repo you can do an svnadmin load --ignore-uuid <
templatedumpfile
(so you retain the unique uuid in the newly created repo).
You can even create a batch/command for this to do it with one command.
BOb
led and run it, looks good.
> but now I need to find a way to link my ldap users to svn
> roles/authz ,
> I still can't find how to do that wihout creating csvn local
> accounts
> for all my users :-( ... !?
Oh man, I thought edge did that for you and provided a web UI to set it up.
Which is why I was considering moving to it when 1.7 came out. Not so?
BOb
command line client supports http(s) just fine.
BOb
d. Are you using svn or apache/http?
Perhaps showing us your config file would help. I think authorization is only
applied to authenticated users.
BOb
> Le 08/10/2010 15:59, Bob Archer a écrit :
> >> Now, is collabnet solution able to serve tradition unix shell
> >> comand
> >> line clients ? is there a svnserve server behind it or is apache
> >> able to
> >> serve those clients using svn protoc
Bla'
> >> user.
> >> Thanks
> >You probably have anon access allowed. Are you using svn or
> apache/http? Perhaps showing us your config file would help. I
> >think authorization is only applied to authenticated users.
>
> >BOb
>
> anon-access = n
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Bob Archer
> wrote:
> > >> Hi all. I have a problem with SVN. I have the (only) user
> > >> 'test_user' (in the 'passwd' file) having 'rw' on the entire
> > >> repository. Why am I able to
> Am I missing something ? Is there a tool to re-root a bunch of
> files/directories that were not initially created within a 'trunk'
> dir
> ?
>
If you are putting this into the same repository why not just export the
stuff then import it into the path you would like it to reside? This will
begin the history for that new path.
BOb
thank you. Since "tagging" is usually done at the file level and it can take
forever. Yes you get an difference rev number in svn when you "tag" but um...
frankly I ignore the rev numbers in svn. TSVN makes that very easy to do.
You'll get used to it quickly and probably prefer it too.
BOb
idual files we modify and point to the modified
> version that we could keep in our repository. My concern is we are
> "overloading" the files in the MW repository with files in our
> repository and I am not sure subversion allows that.
>
There is a whole section in the svn book about this...
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-book.html#svn.advanced.vendorbr
BOb
useful...
>
> If you version and commit your classes, you need to get only
> changed one to patch you application server.
> That's why I need last committed files.
>
> >
> > If that does not help, try rephrasing your question and/or
> providing
> > more background.
My NAnt build scripts have a task that will create a "delta" of the changed
deployables to create a hotfix for example. Just pulling out the changed stuff
from svn wouldn't work anyway... since new binaries need to be built most of
the time.
BOb
oint is, that people like me, or maybe just me at all ;-),
> would
> really appreciate an (semi-?)official download source where I can
> just
> download win32 binaries with all parts of Subversion, without
> overhead
> like Apache and ViewVC.
>
Collabnet's server install does have that. Just tell it not to install Apache.
Is it DL size you are worried about?
BOb
quot;CollabNet Subversion Server and Client v1.6.13 (for
> Windows)".
>
> I assume you have since found that download. It is still provided
> and
> updated with new releases.
No.. where is it? I only see the Edge builds and the Command-line only build.
Where is the server and client build? I am looking here:
http://www.open.collab.net/downloads/subversion/
BOb
l have what they had before. It does have Apache but you can disable
it on the installer and it won't be installed.
http://www.open.collab.net/downloads/subversion/svn1.5.html
BOb
;
> See attachment for a reproduction scenario.
>
> Is this scenario supposed to be handled by SVN ?
> We are in a corporate environment, using 1.5.1. Is the above
> scenario known to be handled correctly in later versions?
> Is it a known issue?
There were many merge issues fixed after 1.5.1.. you should get to the latest
1.6... or at the very least the latest 1.5.
BOb
'3',
> found format '4'")
>
> Seeing that, I completely deleted the repository that I just
> copied, and I
> tried again, creating a new empty repository and moving using
> "svnadmin
> dump" on the first computer, and "svnadmin load" on
l grab the password from the
/auth/svn.simple file and process the auth. The one that does not work
properly will attempt to use `apache` as the user with no stored password.
I've looked into the user .subversion directories on both machines, and
things match up there. I'm stumped.
Bob
l grab the password from the
/auth/svn.simple file and process the auth. The one that does not work
properly will attempt to use `apache` as the user with no stored password.
I've looked into the user .subversion directories on both machines, and
things match up there. I'm stumped.
Bob
; file, and the
> corresponding
> line is :
>
> svn stream tcp nowait
> www-data
> /usr/bin/svnserve svnserve -i --log-file /var/log/svnserve.log
> -r
> /var/lib/svn
>
> I don't understand why it doesn't work.
>
> Isn't it enough to set "anon-access = read" for allowing anonymous
> reading
> access ?
Are you using path based authorization too?
BOb
id you read the section on path-based authorization. It explains how
to do exactly what you are asking about.
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-book.html#svn.serverconfig.pathbasedauthz
BOb
> -Original Message-
> From: Gingko [mailto:from_tig...@nospam.homelinux.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:27 PM
> To: Subversion User List
> Subject: Re: svnserve : anonymous access not working
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From:
Hi...
Any issues with Subversion jumping from release V5R4 to V7R1 of the
iSeries OS/400?
Thanks... Bob
Robert Nason
American Board of Pediatrics, Information Technology
111 Silver Cedar Court
Chapel Hill, NC, 27514-1513
(919) 918.7107 Ext. 121
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wond
e file that your Subversion client just received from the server when
you updated your working copy. This file corresponds to the HEAD revision of
the repository.
Here OLDREV is the revision number of the file in your .svn directory, and
NEWREV is the revision number of the repository HEAD.
BOb
I failing to understand here?
Are you sure utscmd is not already versioned. Ignores only works on
non-versioned files.
BOb
> On 12/02/2010 08:39 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
> >> $ svn update
> >> svn: Unable to lock 'utscmd'
> >>
> >> $ svn propget svn:ignore
> >> utspkg_src
> >> utscmd
> >> utslib
> >> utsbin
> >> utstool
st archives
> that a svn merge --record-only (or a corresponding change of the
> svn:mergeinfo properties) could fix the problem, but how do I find
> out which revisions are affected (e.g. in which revisions the files
> and directories were lost)?
>
Do you have a sparse checkout by any chance? Are you merging in at the same
folder level from where you branched?
BOb
epository might possibly enhance
> performance.
Of course you can run svnadmin upgrade to bring the repository to version 1.6.
If you don't it will keep storing stuff in the 1.5 format and you will lose
many of the advantages of 1.6.
BOb
; > Do you have a sparse checkout by any chance? Are you merging
> > in at the same folder level from where you branched?
>
> No, it's a normal checkout, and I was and am merging at the same
> folder level (_dev) from where I branched.
>
> I noticed however that the mentioned files have been changed in
> another branche and then were merged to trunk (within the given
> range 13561-15003). Is this in some way helpful/important?
Well... there you go. If there has been activity in the trunk since the branch
was done, then you must merge trunk into branch before you can re-integrate
back into trunk. Although, it seems strange that it would mention revision
range that was prior to your branch being created.
BOb
From: Coleman, Brandon [mailto:brandon.cole...@gohastings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:38 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: tracking multiple "test" groups
I currently use SVN with Feature branches that are tested, merged to trunk,
compiled and then sent to a small group of
aybe also in an "archive"
> subdirectory, under tags). If it ever needs to be resurrected, it
> can
> be easily copied from that tag.
>
> Thoughts? Other ideas? Pros and cons?
>
Two options I can think of.. one simple, one will need admin access...
1. Create a folder in your repository named (end of life) and move the project
folder there.
2. Dump the repository, use dumpfilter and import it into an "end of life"
repository, then RM it from your main repo.
BOb
you have 20 files and you
> change
> only a small number of them you only have to merge changes to the
> files
> you modified, the others always have changes in the trunk.
> Is the only option in Subversion to merge the trunk to the branch
> regulary
Yes, pretty much.
BOb
sitory format. So,
just put in the new binary and away you go.
If you do go up to 1.5 or 1.6 then you can either do a dump / load sequence
(usually recommended) or you can run svnadmin upgrade.
>
> Thanks for the help!
BOb
nt queries, I see the
> documentation for other older versions of svn (1.4, 1.5), but I
> don't see the docs for 1.6 or the nightly.
>
The nightly is basically for 1.6.
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-book.html
BOb
has anyone experienced such a behavior?
>
If it truly is losing lines that would be a bug.
However, what were the merged in changes? Are you sure the merge during the
update didn't remove lines?
BOb
ect.
>
> I hope that WANdisco is able to fix many of the issues that have
> been
> plaguing Subversion for years. I don't believe that those who are
> leading Subversion have "failed", but that a private company
> committing resources to an open source project can be a good thing.
> Absolutely correct!
>
> Your analysis / explanation is much better than my own. Thank you.
>
> - David
I also think this is good news and look forward to seeing the WANDisco
contributions to the project. And if I had any more knowledge of the svn
internals I might be applying for one of those positions.
BOb
re and
> then commit ?
> Or should I delete the directories from repo first?
No, don't just delete then replace. Use the svn commands to do your
refactoring. Basically the svn move command. Once you have done all your
refactoring commit your changes.
Have you read the free svn book? Specifically the "basic usage" chapter?
BOb
apabilities.
v1.6 added logging to svnserve.
>
> On the other hand, when you start using Apache you've got a whole
> 'nother pile of code that can have security holes in it...so it's
> really a matter of which risk you're more concerned about.
yep, 6 of one...
BOb
> --
> David Brodbeck
> System Administrator, Linguistics
> University of Washington
ant a more "secure" version of subversion package up your own
binaries that don't include svnserve... let the svn dev's work on the stuff
that we can't do with 3 or 4 lines of a batch/command file.
BOb
it. I guess that applies to *Nix servers too.
BOb
tenation of separate "the admin
> should set these if they want" options creates a quite noticeable
> security risk.
Yes, well aren't you still only keeping the honest people honest? Since svn is
open source anyone can edit the code so the check of servers.conf is a no-op
and it serves anyway.
Why are you making your repository "readable" in the first place?
BOb
at if a fix is made in a version to a binary file,
that same fix is applied to higher versions. This is usually an issue with
reports since we use crystal the .rpt files are binary. It seems to work for us
but may not work for others. If only every file could be textual... ;)
BOb
referenced item during development, one approach is to
> always make an intermediate branch where you make these and any
> other
> needed changes before making the tag.
Or, just make the changes on your working copy and create the tag from your
working copy.
BOb
? I think a "where used" type function is
> what im looking for.
>
There is also a tool called svncopy that will peg the externals for you.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/contrib/client-side/svncopy/svncopy.README
BOb
l directory at any depth, and
any missing intermediate directories will be created, file externals must be
placed into a working copy that is already checked out."
BOb
hat this was a case where the
> reading/parsing/writing
> of our large entries file was causing a slowdown and moving to
> SQLite
> was going to bring performance gains. Clearly that is not the case
> as
> trunk is much slower.
>
> If I get another batch of free time I will try it with a lot of
> small PNG's.
Running Working Copies on RAM drives in Windows makes it fly like the devil.
For anyone inclined to give it a try. Of course, you need some free RAM to be
able to do it. I set up a 2GB RAM drive to try it. I was really trying to
improve Visual Studio perf though, and not svn... so I don't use it any more.
But, I did notice that all svn stuff was much much faster. I can't recall the
software I tried.
BOb
the email will be sent automatically.
This is probably easier that finding some program that uses the SMTP
protocol... tHis assumes the credentials running your batch has permissions to
the pickup folder on the SMTP server of course.
BOb
ad will not create a
repository. You are loading into an empty repository?
2. Try the command without the trailing slash on the repository path... all the
example I see don't use it, and I also don't put it when I have done loads.
BOb
>
I think you can use git-svn to push a git repo to an svn repo.
BOb
ve space is cheap. I would rather have all the dependencies
for each project in my working copy. Sure, store it once in the repository and
use externals in your projects.
Once again, this is all preference, and I just gave you mine. Only you can
decide what is right for you.
BOb
witch to
> still being able to create Repositories within the path of another?
I guess my question would be "why do you want to do that"... and I would also
say DON'T do that.
Bob
u can't nest repos nor should you need
to.
>
> @Stefan: I have no idea what the former Version was, but I upgraded
> from debian Lenny to squeeze so it was probably 1.5.1.
>
> Would it hurt to add a force switch? I mean its at the users risk
> isnt
> it?
>
Yes, it would hurt. This is like saying, I want to create a mySQL database
inside my current mySQL database... why can't I do that?
BOb
t that has child sub-project I really really want them to be
in the same repository. Actually, I put all my projects in the same repository
so I can browser them in "some" repository browser like T-SVN of ViewVC. We
have multiple repositories but they are for different product groups that work
on projects that have no relationship to each other what so ever. Even those
could be in the same repository but seeing how path based auth slows things
down it seemed to make more sense to give each product group their own repo.
BOb
svn is an anti-pattern I expect there is a better way to
do this... or you are not understanding RedMine's sub-projects... or there is a
deficiency in redminds security that doesn't allow you to set different
permissions to a nested subprojects in a single repository.
Perhaps redmine doesn't require the nested projects to actually point to nested
repositories?
BOb
to use the default authorization
> file.
> > authz-db = authz
> >
> > vs.
> >
> > ### Uncomment the line below to use the default authorization
> file.
> > authz-db = ../../foo/bar/authz
>
>
>
> OK, so only the repositories have the sub-directories db, conf,
> dav,
> format, hooks and locks.
>
> If this is true, this installation looks like only one repository
> but
> I really have 506 repositories. I have repositories under
> repositories.
That's not good. But are you sure about that. Where are you "seeing" 506
repositories? Perhaps you just have 506 projects in a single repository.
BOb
t through his part of the course.
So, I would expect that a baton is some symbol or reference to an object that
is passed from one function to another and each function performs its
responsibility modifying the baton or possible using information stored in the
baton.
BOb
s help me if the server _does
> not_ get upgraded to v1.7?
Most of the wc perf improvements will probably work with a 1.6 server. But, I
expect there are some that won't.
All that said, I never heard that there will be a new protocol.
BOb
und the performance is much much faster.
>
>
> Any recommended ram disk software?
I've used this one:
http://memory.dataram.com/products-and-services/software/ramdisk
It is free for up to 4GB disks.
There is also a topic on this over at superuser.com:
http://superuser.com/questions
y step of a same experience?
you shouldn't have to restart the service. But, you will have to restart the
service that you are using, either Apache or svnserve daemon.
BOb
hould not appear right? How do I remove
> this?
I assume these folder are in your repository. Just go into the repository
browser in TortoiseSVn and delete the folders.
BOb
>
>
> /etc/subversion/config is as provided
>
> and my
> /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/dav_
> http://svnbook.red-
> bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.svnserve.html#svn.serverconfig
> .svnserve.auth.users
I'm pretty sure you can use LDAP with svnserve via the SASL support.
BOb
out comes with open source
projects that use svn... since everyone will understand that layout and will
have a very good idea what is what. but even with trunk / branches / tag...
there is no specification of what is on trunk. Is that where stable/tested code
is. Or is that where WIP code is?
BOb
much less time. A dump load of our primary repo takes about a day. svnadmin
upgrade (from 1.5 to 1.6 ran in about 10 mins on our repo.)
BOb
> You don't have to do this but I would think about it... Remember
> the
> clients too.
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 13:19, Nuno Carapeto
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Blair Zajac
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/17/11 12:50 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I have so SVN repos (subversion)
nts of rev6_453_3 into the
working copy, hence trunk. Now create your branch:
svn cp ~/trunk ~/branch/rev6_3_453_5
No check out that branch and put the source for _5 into it an commit.
I think that will get you where you want to be, without having multiple copies
of your projects in your repository and just using the cheap copies of svn.
Also, this all assumes the procedure of release from trunk with future versions
in branches. (Not my favorite way to go but many people us it.)
BOb
is possible?
If you ignore a folder... you are also ignoring any contents or sub-folders of
that folder.
For example, if you have:
/MyPath/Here/IngoreThis
svn:ignore IgnoreThis
as a property of the Here folder... the IgnoreThis and all its contents will be
ignored. Or, is that not what you are asking?
BOb
ng as there is merge
info on a file that isn't in the parent folder the merge info will remain at
the file level. Once they match the merge info in the children (files) will be
elided and you won't see this happen again.
I assume every time you see these property changes you are committing them?
BOb
>
> My repository is still at 1.5.4. I can have my SCM team upgrade me
> to
> 1.6.something. Should I do this, and would it help this problem?
It depends on what version you were on... but early versions of 1.5 did create
alot more mergeinfo than was necessary... and also it was created in some
instances when it shouldn't have been. I highly suggest you get up to date.
However, that won't "resolve" this issue... although it isn't really an
issue... see my previous email.
BOb
> On 03/24/2011 05:01 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> >> On 03/23/2011 08:02 PM, David Huang wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 23, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Pat Farrell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 03/23/2011 08:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> >>>&
dits
> will
> be on remote files. In principal they want to use tortoise. How
> should
> this be implemented?
Frankly, my recommendation would be not like that. Each user should have a
private working copy... for best performance it should be on their local PC.
BOb
of a branch for
release use case.
I think you are over thinking this... how is tagging a revision that contains
the changes for a feature with a "Q" than tagging each file with a "Q"?
BOb
;
> > I don't know that the above sentence is correct. Can you give
> > an example of a scenario when that happens?
>
> Working copies will be upgraded silently.
A working copy is not a repository though.
BOb
to a certain revision
> of a
> > > file."
> > > We use tags in CVS to identify the files which have passed
> module
> > > tests and should make it into our integration test environment.
>
> > So you are saying you test "files" in isolation? That se
it is a conflict.
It is a conflict because two people changed the same line of code. So, the
software can't know which line of code you want to remain after it merges
them... you have to tell it. You could choose one line, the other line, or even
combine them in some way.
BOb
>
>
been 3 months
away for several years now.
BOb
> On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 10:26 -0400, Bob Archer wrote:
> > > I read the SVN book, as there are three type conflicts: text,
> > > tree and
> > > properties conflict. However, I wanna know why it is a
> conflict.
> > > For
> > > example, if there
changes - keeping your code base clean at all times.
Optionally, you can set up TeamCity to automatically commit changes to your
version control each time they pass all checks."
BOb
would be to do all your development on a branch. Have you build
scripts build from that branch. IF the build is successful perform a merge to
trunk. If the build fails, don't do the merge. Since branch is never checked
into there shouldn't be merge conflicts. (well, tree conflicts would still be
possible.)
BOb
much all you need to know. Of course, after you grok it you
can come back here and ask more specific questions.
BOb
y", and the repository seems to be
> fine. None of the config files has been changed in over a year, so
> I doubt they're corrupted. Any ideas?
It is possible it is binding to IPv6 rather than IPv4... I think you can pass
in the IP you want it to bind to.
http://www.bramschoenmakers.nl/en/node/287
BOb
ed to tell svnserve where your repository is on the machine.
> e.g.
>
> svnserve -d -r /path/to/repo
>
> It's probably trying to serve a repository rooted at /, which is
> probably not where yours is.
>
I was going to say this, but I looked at the --help for svnserver and it
doesn't seem to require the -r param. I figure it roots to the pwd. But, if he
isn't running it from the repo root then yea... that!
BOb
revert your merge and verify that your working copy didn't already have
those r461 merge indicators in it. I know here people have checked in files
that had unresolved conflict markers in them.
BOb
> --
> From: "Bob Archer"
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:33 AM
> To: "Daniel Walter" ;
>
> Subject: RE: duplicate merge conflict
>
> >> When I merge changes in SVN, the merges work well ex
opyright 2010-2011, 2014 Big Software, Inc.
So, I wouldn't want this automatically done. I would recommend you use a
copyright.txt file with the notice and have your build system or something
inject it.
BTW: IANAL either.
BOb
I think
> that a particular merge will generate a lot of conflicts.
If you are merging everything in there is no need to worry. That is the point
of merge tracking. It will determine what has yet to be merged and select the
correct revisions.
Here is how we have our repo set up... rather than using trunk. We find it
makes things easier.
We basically "branch" when we start on a new release version. So we have
something like this:
1.0.0
\
\
1.0.1 +-
\
\
1.0.2 +--
We release from the version path (branch). Any hotfixes for that version are
done on that branch. Then they are merged forward "up" version. So we merge a
change made on the 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 then to 1.0.2 and forward. We "try" to only
have our current release (1.0.1) and one back (1.0.0) in maintenance and then
the in dev version (1.0.2). Of course, you always have that one client that
doesn't want to upgrade and sales/support insists we do a fix... but we still
just merge it up versions until it is merged into the unreleased dev version.
BOb
gt; > have that one client that doesn't want to upgrade and
> sales/support
> > insists we do a fix... but we still just merge it up versions
> until it is
> > merged into the unreleased dev version.
> >
> > BOb
> >
> >
> >
>
> This seem
; Notice, I didn't specify and ranges. svn figures out what
> revisions from
> > the source path have not yet been merged in for me.
> >
> > BTW: Just as an aside we do have a branches folder in the project
> and this
> > is where we put feature branches. Although w
ion
> and the working copy.
>
> Thanks a lot!
The second column of the status output shows the status of the dir/file
properties.
I assume you have access to the "svn status" command's API?
BOb
rt
> this, but it is not very useful for understanding what I did wrong.
>
> I wanted to check my version numbers, to make sure that I am using
> recent
> versions. My client is 1.6.13. Is there a way to get the server
> version
> from the svn client?
I guess my question is...
1. Can you do the merge --record-only without specifying revisions.
2. What is it corrupting exactly?
BOb
> --
> From: "Bob Archer"
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:17 AM
> To: "Daniel Walter" ; "Stefan Sperling"
>
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: duplicate merge conflict
>
> >> >> Reco
d.
> what are common reasons to prefer other platforms, e.g. Linux? I'm
> looking for some accurate arguments and facts for my book. Thanks
> for
> your help.
Ok, common reasons to prefer one over the other, well laid out is perfectly
reasonable. ;)
BOb
Hi Mike,
I recently had a client who insisted on VisualSVN on Windows. It was a
very quick and easy setup. I would normally always put the repo on
Linux, but some folks are just more comfortable with what they know or
they may not even have a linux server..
Bob
http://www.linkedin.com/in
it it in one single commit, will it break merge tracking?
If you do commit the same change manually to trunk and branch and then you try
to do a merge you will get a conflict. You can do a --record-only merge after
the fact to resolve that problem though. Or just deal with the conflict when
you do finally merge.
BOb
ing to has your name and email
address in it. It will be archived. I'm not sure how it identifies "you". I'm
not sure how you are expecting your email/name to be private when you post it
to a publically accessible email list.
BOb
ccess...
>
> -Alan
Are you sure he has "full" access? Path based auth will not hide the folder
names in root. He will still be able to see them.
BOb
d of course have
access in this case. Deny doesn't trump allow as it does in other systems. Also
there is the same problem with:
[/]
*=rw
jon=
Because jon is a subset of * which gives him read/write access.
BOb
diate rather than full depth giving you a sparse checkout.
BOb
s why I mentioned in my OP that I thought this might be me
> misunderstanding the meaning of "anonymous access" in this context.
What authentication method are you using? I'm guessing while *= works but
"jon=" (or other user names) doesn't that isn't the full user name that svn
sees. If you look at your log are the usernames the ones you are expecting and
putting into the authz file?
BOb
rate you merge that rev from trunk with --record-only you
can keep using the same branch. But, yes for the most part, "reintegrate" is
designed for feature branches which are generally not used/needed after the
feature is reintegrated into trunk.
BOb
1 - 100 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
