that directory only exists as a property of it's
parent. I'd like to use this so that I don't have to worry about
updating the libs path for my tools every time I release a new
version.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I might be able to accomplish this
or a more effective way of
each function?
Thanks,
Andrew
to
checkout and commit.
I will look into WebDav support a bit more. I've read a few more webdav
notes and found the references to RFCs.
Thanks,
Andrew
150 or so folders and around
5,000 objects so I can't manually merge each one.
Thanks in advance
Andrew
Version Information
Window XP Professional SP3
Visual SVN Server running on Windows Server 2003 SP2
TortoiseSVN 1.6.12, Build 20536 - 32 Bit , 2010/11/24 20:59:01
Subve
still uses PBLs.
Cheers
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: amit.sas...@wipro.com [mailto:amit.sas...@wipro.com]
Sent: Thursday, 13 January 2011 20:25
To: mdi...@elego.de
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; sudip.da...@wipro.com;
pabitra.mall...@wipro.com; avik.na...@wipro.com; sourav.s...
:
Faulting application svn.exe, version 1.6.12.38263, faulting module
sliksvn-libapr-1.dll, version 1.3.12.0, fault address 0x6b66.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 13 January 2011 23:10
To: SUMNER Andrew
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
S
beautifully after that.
Thanks
Andrew
The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged and/or sensitive. It
is intended for the addressee only and is not necessarily the official view or
communication of the New Zealand Customs Service. If you are not the intended
recipient you are asked
using svn 1.6.13
When I attempt to delete it, it gives me a message indicating success,
however the property persists. Any ideas how to remove this? Can I safely
edit the revprops 0 file?
svn propdel svn:sync-lock --revprop -r 0 REPO_URL
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:59:10PM -0500, Andrew Sasak wrote:
> > using svn 1.6.13
> > When I attempt to delete it, it gives me a message indicating success,
> >
It was a hook preventing the deletion, not sure why I got a success message.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:22:30PM -0500, Andrew Sasak wrote:
> > svn propdel svn:sync-lock --revprop -r 0 REPO_URL
>
> That looks good.
ual SVN (on windows server 2003) if this makes any
difference to tool selection.
The repository I wish to sync contains database script files.
Thanks
Andrew
The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged and/or sensitive. It
is intended for the addressee only and is
this for database changes...)
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:34
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sync SVN to CVS
Guten Tag SUMNER Andrew,
am Dienstag, 29. März 2011 um 21:56 schrieben Sie:
>
I totally agree. I have just started using it for a PowerBuilder
project and it has worked very well.
-Original Message-
From: David Weintraub [mailto:qazw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 April 2011 11:05
To: San Martino
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build project in pre-
ow
unversioned copy and running svn up with foo.txt as the explicit target will
correctly check it out, but it can be hard to realize that something's
missing when svn st and svn up of that directory say that everything's up to
date.
Thanks,
-Andrew
Unless you exported multiple revisions, you shouldn't need more than a few
positive matches to determine the revision.
First, compare the tree structure against the repository. You'll want to avoid
researching moved files, and this will help you narrow down your search.
Second, 'svn export' se
I have a mirror that is synced using svnsync from the master server.
The master server was updated to 1.7.1 yesterday, the mirror was updated to
1.7 last week.
I had a few good syncs occur yesterday after the master was updated.
The mirror locked up last night and was rebooted this morning.
Since t
at 1:22 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:13:38PM -0400, Andrew Sasak wrote:
> > I have a mirror that is synced using svnsync from the master server.
> > The master server was updated to 1.7.1 yesterday, the mirror was updated
> to
> > 1.7 last week.
&g
I maintain a mirror of a repository that I must sneakernet sync using
a "dump, burn cd, load" process. I use --deltas and --incremental to
dump. I do not have access to every directory in the repository.
Occasionally, I am given access to a directory after it has existed
for some time. The revision
svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place on the
server and the --incremental option is not used. The message returned
is "authorization failed". This does not occur when the --incremental
option occurs. The svnrdump command is version 1.7.2.
, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> When --incremental isn't used svnrdump tries to dump the full tree and
> runs into the authz restrictions. Do you have a suggestion for an
> alternative behaviour?
>
> Andrew Sasak wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:58:50 -0400:
>> svnrdump fails when a
Check for svn:externals that point to an external repository. That password
prompt may be for the external repository, and you're getting locked out (of
the external repo) because you are providing the wrong password for the wrong
repo.
From: Wendell Nichols [mailto:wc...@shaw.ca]
Sent: Tuesd
I know this is an old thread, but I see this error quite often with SVN
1.7. I am using Cornerstone 2.7.7 which uses SVN 1.7.5 internally. I get
corrupted working copies about once a month which of course ruins the
working copy and is very difficult to recover from in terms of wasted time.
I ne
As you've discovered, externals *always* pull in the HEAD revision unless you
specifically add a revision number to the svn:externals property. Needless to
say, "rogue" svn:externals are bad for build reproducibility and tagging.
Options are:
Audit the svn:externals (either manually, via a chec
t commit, as the case may be), but as far as I'm aware, this
isn't possible with SVN, or any third-party tools? For what it's
worth, I currently use Subversive in Eclipse, and SVN 1.6 (not sure
exactly what version) as the client, and something really, really old
on the server.
Thanks,
- Andrew Thorburn
Say you have multiple projects in one repository.
Is there an easy way to separate out one project tree, along with its
specific history, and move it to a new or different repository?
Thanks in advance, apologies if it's in the manual somewhere.
l
modifications to an unlocked svn:needs-lock file.
Is there a legitimate use case here that I'm not thinking of?
Thanks,
Andrew
Anyone familiar with this svnsync bug/issue? I didn't see anything substantive
via google or in the svn issue tracker.
C:\>svnsync sync svn://localhost/devel_mirror
Transmitting file data ..
svnsync: E160016: Path
'DigitalDelivery/DigitalSecure/ddp/aps/shared/apss-ddp-ejb
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:jreed...@incomm.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:26 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svnsync: E160016: Path ... not present
>
> Anyone familiar with this svnsync bug/issue? I didn't see a
Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format
lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnadmin upgrade" such an
old repo, all of which fail with "svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file
'devel\db\current': The system cannot find the file specified."
Do I n
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Bruni [mailto:jbr...@icloud.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:09 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)
>
> > On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:0
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:jreed...@incomm.com]
>
> > > On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The
> > > db/format lists &
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Are we talking about the repository format or the FSFS format here? If
> /db/fs-type says "fsfs" then the repository format
> (/format) is probably 3 and you're talking about /db/format,
> yes? The distinction is i
Works for me.
svn, version 1.8.10 (r1615264)
Windows 7
C:\Users\jdoe\workspace\foobar>svn pl -v A.txt
Properties on 'A.txt':
pebls:plcm
Test@4575
pebls:sha1
8cd8818d6b4f5edcb8b6e25cdf471af62bca403c
C:\Users\jdoe\workspace\foobar>svn rename A.txt AA.txt
A A
> From: Dan Ellis [mailto:danelli...@gmail.com]
>
> **Brane asked: There's no REN.txt in your example.
> **Anyway, please tell us which version of the client you're using (svn
> --version) and where it came from.
>
> I meant to exclude that as its not relevant, was trying to point out the
> e
SubversionEdge from collabnet is a pre-packaged solution that takes most of the
effort out of setting up svn + http/https:
http://www.collab.net/products/subversion
From: Novinsky, Stanley J. [mailto:stan.novin...@jhuapl.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 5:54 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.or
Since you're moving from windows to Ubuntu, you can run the dump/load process
over ssh to avoid having to deal with bloated dump files:
http://martin.ankerl.com/2006/01/24/svnadmin-dump-and-load-over-ssh/ (You can
use mobaxterm (http://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/ ) on Windows, which is a Cygwin
ba
> -Original Message-
> From: Timur Khanipov [mailto:khani...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:20 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: Иван Коптелов
> Subject: Two-step merge ok, one-step merge conflicts
>
> Hi folks.
>
> I faced the following problem. The command
>
I was under the impression that subversion now automatically takes subtree
mergeinfo into account:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html#svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.stayinsync.subtree
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com]
Go here https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes select a release and
then look at the “Feature Compatibility Table” which will specify which
features require what server/client version.
However, as already noted, basic features will work with any 1.x client and 1.x
server.
From: Leon
> From: Doug Robinson [mailto:doug.robin...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:49 PM
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Mark McKeown; Andreas Stieger; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: which version control supports file locking and who has it locked
>
>
> I'm not sure about Perforce'
> From: Michael Schwager [mailto:mschw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:25 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Creating and Verifying a Reliable backup
>
> Following is an update to my question of Jun 1, where I ask the following
> question:
>
... snip verify/back
> Hello! I've been having trouble getting my own pre-revprop-change hook script
> to work. Svn was refusing any change to a revprop with the following error:
>
> svn: E165001: Revprop change blocked by pre-revprop-change hook (exit code 1)
> with no outpu
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 9:38 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Linux] Hook hashbang hardships
>
> On 14.10.2016 14:58, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> >> Hello! I
pshot occurs,
would svnadmin hotcopy still be able to safely handle creating the backup?
Is this a safe procedure for creating backups?
Thanks,
Andrew Martin
- Original Message -
> From: "Stefan Sperling"
> To: "amartin"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:29:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Backup using ZFS Snapshots
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 03:17:53PM -0600, Andrew Martin wrote:
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Phippard"
> To: "amartin"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:35:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Backup using ZFS Snapshots
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Andrew Martin wrote:
>
>&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Phippard"
> To: "amartin"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:57:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Backup using ZFS Snapshots
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Martin wrote:
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Phippard"
> To: "amartin"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:40:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Backup using ZFS Snapshots
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Andrew Martin wrote:
>
>>
Not a complete solution, but it's a start. Craft a "svn mkdir" that includes
the url to test and a url that will always fail, e.g.
svn mkdir -m "" http://server/repo/dir2test/a
http://server/repo/readonly/z
However, it looks like the urls are sorted and then processed in sort order
(i
> From: horst.schl...@gmx.de [mailto:horst.schl...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 4:04 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: How to checkout only the changes
>
>
> Is there a way to export only the changes, that occured in a specific
> revision? Like export or checkout only the
echo svn export --force "$SVNREPO/$i@$REV" "$D/"
done
-Original Message-
From: horst.schl...@gmx.de [mailto:horst.schl...@gmx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 9:28 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to checkout only the changes
On 03/27/
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:41 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: horst.schl...@gmx.de; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to checkout only the changes
>
> 'vsvn diff
> From: Eggler, Ron (GE Energy Connections) [mailto:ron.egg...@ge.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 7:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn feature addition?
>
> Hi There,
>
> I am looking for the following features in svn:
> - When you do svn commit, instead of automatically
It’s been awhile, but isn’t changing the commit message (after a push)
potentially problematic in git?
>> Does anyone know how long it would take to export the repository of this
>> size? This will give us an estimate how long to schedule down time and cut
>> off time.
Svnsync is the easy option.
If you insist on doing a dump/load, then a) you can time a test run of a
dump/load, and b) "svnadm
> -Original Message-
> From: Lorenz [mailto:loren...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 1:34 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Individual file merge . Merging a newly added file
>
> JP wrote:
> >I am trying to merge a newly added file . I am getting the follo
should retry to work around this
transparently, and thus be more robust? Perhaps it could retry up to 3 times
with a sleep a 1 second between retries?
Andrew Marlow
Consultant developer, Apex
38th Floor, 25 Canada Square,
Canary Wharf, London E14 5LQ
T: 020-8081-2367 / 07966-451-521
E: andrew.mar
Reply below:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling
Sent: 24 April 2019 07:54
To: Marlow, Andrew
Cc: Johan Corveleyn ; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: svn version 1.10 lack of robustness in presence of flaky
network
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:55:47AM +0200, Johan
ystem. But is it on a network share? Not sure, but I don't think so. IMO
that would be an extremely bad setup.
-Original Message-
From: Marlow, Andrew
Sent: 24 April 2019 09:52
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: svn version 1.10 lack of robustness in presence
Reply below:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn
Sent: 24 April 2019 11:30
To: Marlow, Andrew
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: svn version 1.10 lack of robustness in presence of
flaky network
> >Regarding the comment that was made, I don't k
Crucible.
-Original Message-
From: wuzhouhui
Sent: 11 August 2019 05:19
To: Subversion
Subject: EXTERNAL: which review tools are suitable for codes versioned by svn
Hi,
I'm searching some review tools which are suitable for codes versioned by
Subversion, any recommends?
The informati
Hello everyone and thank you Detlef for reporting this situation. I want to add
that I also see this from time to time and would like to see a fix.
It is very easy for me to see network errors from subversion because I am in an
environment where the network is extremely unreliable. This fact has
Hello everyone,
The answer is "yes". I have come across investment banks that store boost
releases in subversion. Sometimes it's a full boost release and that can be
quite large. They take a long time to checkout but at the time it seemed better
than the alternatives available at the time, e.g.
I too have seen this error several times and I am convinced it happens in the
presence of an unreliable network. The network I am using is very unreliable so
this problem is seen from time to time. When it happens the checkout has to be
cleaned, then if the command is tries again it usually work
> From: David Sandberg [mailto:david.sandb...@hickorytech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:18 PM
>
> 1) User Jim commits a new file A with the Revision keyword to the trunk
> in revision 101.
> 2) User Sam merges trunk revision 101 into his feature branch, and the
> new file A comes across
> -Original Message-
> From: David Sandberg [mailto:david.sandb...@hickorytech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:52 PM
>
> Thank you for that crystal clear explanation, which accounts perfectly
> for the observed behavior. I will add that I am not sure I agree with
> the correctnes
tried to
load the mod_dav_svn.so and the mod_authz_svn.so, apache just crashes and
tells me it can't load the module.
Thanks,
Andrew
sion\subversion\libsvn_wc\update_editor.c'
Error: line 1587: assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit ||
action
Error: == svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action ==
svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
Completed!:
Andrew Newlands
Software & Consultancy Services Manager
Britannic T
Is it just me or is svn log's "--xml" switch not including
"--use-merge-history" information?
The text output of "svn log --use-merge-history" includes the "Merged via:
r3673" information:
r3584 | bob | 2013-04-16 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 4:24 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: "svn log --xml --use-merge-history ..." doesn't include
> --use-merge-history in the xm
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 11:53 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: mergeinfo between svn copied branches and merges
>
> we have branchA
> we svn copy branchA to produce branchB
> branches A and B continues development and checkins
> branchA
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 6:49 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mergeinfo between svn copied branches and merges
>
> In this case, all you should have to do is:
> a) merge branchC
You can do a fresh checkout and not include project10 in the initial update:
svn co -N svn://.../top_dir
cd top_dir
cd svn update project1 project2 ... project 9
Future 'svn update' commands in the top_dir directory will only update projects
1 through 9.
Or you can explicitly not update project 1
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 3:05 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi All
>
> We use SVN 1.6
>
> We have a revision number which refuses to move to the merged list after
> applyi
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:09 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thanks for responding; appreciate it.
>
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 8:25 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thanks for taking the time to respond.
&g
Problem: Subversion doesn't have branches.
Subversion has directory objects, and we Humans(tm) arbitrarily decide that
some directories are "branches," thereby giving these directories (branches)
magical powers and mystical significance. Meanwhile, Subversion grinds on,
treating those magic
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:35 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> Well, given that you have no
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:57 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branc
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> a
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:05 AM
> To: Zé
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:24 AM
> To: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> .. snip
>
> You keep sa
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 4:17 PM
> To: Zé
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> So wh
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:30 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> Guten Tag Bob Archer,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:24 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
> Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the St
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:41 AM
> To: Bob Archer
> Cc: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> Of
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:33 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branc
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:32 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> On 21.05.2013 20:26, Branko Či
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:36 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> a
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Baumanis [mailto:gbauma...@cogstate.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 12:31 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Merging change sets for a production release,
> Importance: High
>
> At the moment we do all of our work on /trunk and also have
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Baumanis [mailto:gbauma...@cogstate.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:27 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Merging change sets for a production release,
>
> Hi Andrew,
> Thanks for
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> We are seeing a strange anomaly after our last check-in - on fresh checkout
> there is a tree conflict into a new path - I'v
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:12 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> I can reproduce on the versions specified above of the CygWin svn client
&
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> A my_project_03b_pristine/Project/settings/MkSharedData.exe
> C my_project_03b_pristine/Project/settings/MkImage
> A
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 4:45 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
> Thanks for your help, I will try again this.
> But this is very poor compared to ClearCase. Nobody tried to script that ?
I u
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:42 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
> Thanks All for your help and advices,
> But :
>
> With CC, I can easily search for any file element in a repository, and
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:57 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
>
> Thanks All again for your help,
>
>
> > If you're just trying to find a file in the current version of the repo,
> > t
> From: C M [mailto:cmanalys...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 12:39 PM
> To: C. Michael Pilato
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Ancestrally Related Error Message
>
> I think my earlier mistake might have been that I was using the --reintegrate
> option.
> Without it, I make some prog
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
