Question about svn:auto-props pattern matching precedence

2021-10-21 Thread Eugeny Sosnovsky
To whom it may concern, The SVN Book version 1.8 states, that if at a given path, *svn:auto-props* contains two or more file patterns that can match the same file, and such a file is added, then "there is no way to know" which pattern will be applied (and therefore, which pattern's corresponding pr

RE: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9

2021-10-21 Thread Tomasz Lubinski
I tried once again, now with svn.exe built from 1.14.1 sources. With OPENSSL 1.1.1l. It seems that it crashes somewhere in zlib. Logs attached. Tomek L From: Daniel Sahlberg Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 3:21 PM To: Tomasz Lubinski Cc: Subversion Subject: Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and

Re: Question about svn:auto-props pattern matching precedence

2021-10-21 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 09:31 skrev Eugeny Sosnovsky < eugeny.sosnov...@silverfirsoftware.com>: > To whom it may concern, > The SVN Book version 1.8 states, that if at a given path, *svn:auto-props* > contains two or more file patterns that can match the same file, and such a > file is added, the

Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9

2021-10-21 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 07:58 skrev Tomasz Lubinski : > I tried once again, now with svn.exe built from 1.14.1 sources. With > OPENSSL 1.1.1l. It seems that it crashes somewhere in zlib. > > Logs attached. > Can you check the server logs and firewalls as I asked in the other mail? I think we ha

RE: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9

2021-10-21 Thread Tomasz Lubinski
I’m using Virtual SVN, server shows accepted connection with code 200. I’ve found the problem. There is a problem with zlib 1.2.11. I use zlib 1.2.7 (that was used by me some time ago) and it seems that it works OK, now. Very strange problem with assembly code in zlib 1.2.11. Tomek L

Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9

2021-10-21 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 13:39 skrev Tomasz Lubinski : > I’m using Virtual SVN, server shows accepted connection with code 200. > > > > I’ve found the problem. There is a problem with zlib 1.2.11. I use zlib > 1.2.7 (that was used by me some time ago) and it seems that it works OK, > now. > > Very

Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9

2021-10-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2:00 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 13:39 skrev Tomasz Lubinski : >> >> I’m using Virtual SVN, server shows accepted connection with code 200. >> >> >> >> I’ve found the problem. There is a problem with zlib 1.2.11. I use zlib >> 1.2.7 (that was use

Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9

2021-10-21 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 14:05 skrev Johan Corveleyn : > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2:00 PM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > > > > Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 13:39 skrev Tomasz Lubinski < > t.lubin...@verocel.pl>: > >> > >> I’m using Virtual SVN, server shows accepted connection with code 200. > >> > >> > >

Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9

2021-10-21 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:06 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 13:39 skrev Tomasz Lubinski > > : > >> Very strange problem with assembly code in zlib 1.2.11. > Indeed, zlib's assembly code seems to be unreliable on Windows. When I > build / test (for signing new release

Re: svn binary packages for macOS

2021-10-21 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:55 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: >> Would it make sense to give them a heads up before removing the links in >> case they would like to release newer packages and remain on the list? > > > Yes, if we have any contact channels (I'm not sure about sending to an > anonymous in