On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:05:49AM +0200, Carmen Alzzer wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> so im starting to tune a Subversion installation, that runs slow on merges.
> So im starting looking into apache MPM - current its setup to event MPM in
> Apache2.4, but i figure it perhaps should be preforked. Whats you
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:05:49AM +0200, Carmen Alzzer wrote:
> > hi guys,
> >
> > so im starting to tune a Subversion installation, that runs slow on merges.
> > So im starting looking into apache MPM - current its setup to event
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:44 AM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Keep in mind most of the work performed during merges occurs client-side.
> If people are running old clients, ask them to upgrade.
>
> There are some server-configuration factors which can increase latency
> between client and servers, or wh
On 2020-01-23 18:40:56 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre wrote on Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:50 +0100:
> > On 2020-01-23 12:44:02 +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> > > If the automounter already yields ENOENT for the ../.svn directory
> > > probe, everything is not going to be a problem. I think th
hello friends,
Thanks for replying - no hard feelings for getting fast up from the seat
:)
I was thinking the MPM might have a saying, since the process management
of a certain worker might be optimal for the way Subversion operates - i
notice that many requests are sent to the server from e
