On Feb 7, 2020, at 02:44, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:37:10PM -0500, Daniel Dickison wrote:
>> Strangely, the conflict goes away if you flip the order of steps 2 and 3,
>> or commit the merge from step 4 first.
>
> I would say it is working as designed, but the design h
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:44 +0100:
> Which is why I see no way to fix this in SVN itself.
> If we made SVN record r5 during the original merge (before r5 existed),
> that would be wrong.
> And if we made SVN skip A/mu edits from r5 during the conflicting merge,
> that would be w
