Anton Shepelev wrote:
>How can I view the working-copy path with which a
>lock is associated, given the information about the
>lock from `svnadmin lslocks'?
you can't.
The server knows nothing about the working copy and its location,
only about the user.
If you know the working copy, you cou
Lorenz to Anton Shepelev:
>>How can I view the working-copy path with which a
>>lock is associated, given the information about
>>the lock from `svnadmin lslocks'?
>
>you can't. The server knows nothing about the
>working copy and its location, only about the user.
>
>If you know the wor
Does svn path based authorization support nested groups?
group_a = fred,jim
group_b = jane,@group_a
Best regards
David
Lorenz wrote on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:20 +00:00:
> Anton Shepelev wrote:
> >How can I view the working-copy path with which a
> >lock is associated, given the information about the
> >lock from `svnadmin lslocks'?
>
> you can't.
> The server knows nothing about the working copy and its location
David Aldrich wrote on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:29 +00:00:
> Does svn path based authorization support nested groups?
>
> group_a = fred,jim
> group_b = jane,@group_a
>
> Best regards
> David
[[[
% cat authz
[groups]
group_a = fred,jim
group_b = jane,@group_a
[/]
* =
@group_b = r
% svnauthz accesso
I want to work on a project on a Raspberry Pi computer but this particular
one is not networked with the svn server...
I do have another RPi on the same network as the svn server so I can check
out a WC to that computer via VPN access to the RPi.
So I wonder if this would work:
1) Check out proj
Bo Berglund wrote on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:27 +00:00:
> So I wonder if this would work:
Yes, with two caveats:
- The versions of svn on the two RPis must use the same working copy
format. All 1.8.0..1.12.x versions use the same working copy format
as each other.
- Recommend that you look into
Daniel Shahaf:
> And for future reference, you can have your users lock
> files using something along the lines of `svn lock -m
> "$(hostname):$(pwd)' to be able to answer your question.
> You could even enforce this with a pre-lock hook.
Thank you, Daniel. Since the pre-lock hook does not recei