Daniel Shahaf writes:
> You probably know the following, but for the list's benefit I'll say it:
> awk(1) is not a robust way to parse `svn status` output; the output is
> columns-oriented, not whitespace-separated-fields oriented. `svn st |
> cut` or `svn st --xml` are the recommended idioms.
N
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:08:36PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:06 +0200:
> > In --non-interactive mode the default value for --accept is 'recommended'.
>
> This is a backwards incompatible change to the semantics of `svn merge
> --non-interactive` (wi
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:06:07AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > You probably know the following, but for the list's benefit I'll say it:
> > awk(1) is not a robust way to parse `svn status` output; the output is
> > columns-oriented, not whitespace-separated-fields
