Some more news about that, debugged that a little bit further and imho i
think its a bug in the module code of access_checker - or there are
assumptions made which do not hold in my usecase - at least its unclear
to me why its done that way, maybe someone can give some input.
The problem is that t
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:05:40AM +0100, Torsten Krah wrote:
> Some more news about that, debugged that a little bit further and imho i
> think its a bug in the module code of access_checker - or there are
> assumptions made which do not hold in my usecase - at least its unclear
> to me why its do
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Andreas Krey wrote on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:14 +0100:
>> svndumping, filtering and reloading may fix the file names for
>> all revisions, but I have no idea how the client sandboxes
>> will react to that.
>
> The term is "working copies", and i
On 24.01.2018 14:11, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Andreas Krey wrote on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:14 +0100:
>>> svndumping, filtering and reloading may fix the file names for
>>> all revisions, but I have no idea how the client sandboxes
>>> will
Hi all,
The page at:
https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/conventions.html
has the text "Variadic arugment lists" in a section heading and link
to that section. That should be corrected to "Variadic argument
lists."
Where is the appropriate place to contribute website corrections?
Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:15 -0500:
> The page at:
> https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/conventions.html
>
> has the text "Variadic arugment lists" in a section heading and link
> to that section. That should be corrected to "Variadic argument
> lists."
Thanks, f
