Marc Pawlowsky wrote on Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 20:48:16 -0500:
> However I believe a supported, documented, and forward compatible way is
> preferable; given the volume of questions that come up when googling it
> seems to be a popular item.
>
I don't recall it ever being asked before on this lis
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> >> For directories it seems like a no-brainer to avoid the conflict.
>> >
>> > Indeed, adding a resolver option for this should not be very difficult.
>>
>> I'd opt for not having a conflict in the first place.
>
> There is a reason the n
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> >> >> For directories it seems like a no-brainer to avoid the conflict.
>> >> >
>> >> > Indeed, adding a reso
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> >> For directories it seems like a no-brainer to avoid the conflict.
> >> >
> >> > Indeed, adding a resolver option for this should not be very difficult.
> >>
> >> I'
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> >> >> For directories it seems like a no-brai
