On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 14.10.2016 09:17, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> FWIW, I think you have a valid usecase, though it's a bit unusual. Of
>> your proposed solutions, I think 1 and 2 are not possible (1 breaks
>> backwards compatibility
>
> On the other hand, I'd a
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 14.10.2016 09:17, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> FWIW, I think you have a valid usecase, though it's a bit unusual. Of
>>> your proposed solutions, I think 1 and 2 are not possible (1