Re: Timestamp issue with "svn status" in 1.9.3

2016-09-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:40:24AM -0700, xvdes...@gmail.com wrote: > I believe the timestamp to have a granularity of minutes on Linux, but I'm > not sure of this. Even if it has second precision, such merge scripts can > beat that. This depends on the file system being used. Microseconds are n

Re: Timestamp issue with "svn status" in 1.9.3

2016-09-08 Thread xvdessel
> So, that's why you're seeing this behaviour. What's unclear is why you are > investigating this behaviour in the first place. What is your use case for > changing the file's content but leaving it's timestamp unchanged? We have a very clear case for this. An automated Jenkins process must e