On 7/1/2016 07:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 22:26:31 +0200:
>> It just needs one more vote from a committer to make it in,
>> and no vetoes.
> It needs no more votes: bindings changes require one +1 and one +0, and
> r1683266 has that. You can move the c
On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:52:05 +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
...
> And I agree that this argument is missing the point. It claims that because
> a merge may select just a subset of changes committed in a particular
> revision,
> drawing a "line" to indicate a merge commit would be misleading since n
