RE: AW: Timestamp issue with "svn status" in 1.9.3

2016-03-06 Thread Peter Klotz
Hello Philip > > Instead of "why is the second change not reported" it should be "why > > is the first change reported". > > > > Relevant part of the script: > > At this point Subversion has recorded a timestamp for the file. > > > echo "2" > x > > touch -m -t "20121231.00" x > > svn -

Can't get "svn log --use-merge-history" to list all

2016-03-06 Thread Stefan Karlsson
I will try to describe the "scenery", but I have also attached a Windows batch file that creates a repository ("repos") and a work folder ("work"), as well as the log file ("log.txt") described below. I have also attached my copy of "log.txt". This is in short was the batch file does: A branch is