Re: Subversion 1.9.1 and SVNParentPath

2015-09-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.09.2015 02:16, Tony Butt wrote: > On 07/09/15 10:10, Tony Butt wrote: >> > # Compression options >> >AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml >> >SetInputFilter DEFLATE >> > >> > # Krb Authentication >> >Include /etc/apache2/krb.conf >> > >> >AuthDBMType def

R: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Daniele Pedroni
Yes Bert, you’re right, my explanation wasn’t 100% clear: I meant that everyone who pointed out this issue was using SVN on network drives. I’m using svnserve service on a windows 2003 server with F-Secure 11.01; my PC has Windows 7 x64 with F-Secure 12.00. I tried disabling the antivirus on my

R: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Daniele Pedroni
Hi Ivan, thank you very much, but honestly speaking I don't know how to test it: I installed SVN server through Redmine Bitnami package, and I update SVN on my PC using TortoiseSVN installer. If you provide me some suggestions about how to test it, I'll try it! Looking forward to hear from you

Re: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 7 September 2015 at 11:12, Daniele Pedroni wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > thank you very much, but honestly speaking I don't know how to test it: I > installed SVN server through Redmine Bitnami package, and I update SVN on my > PC using TortoiseSVN installer. > If you provide me some suggestions abou

R: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Daniele Pedroni
Hi Ivan, yes, definitely, thank you a lot! So, if I got your point, with your updated svn.exe I'll be able to test if command line work properly, but I'll have to wait for TortoiseSVN update to use it? Or the latter relies on the same svn.exe so it should work as well after the update? Daniel

Re: R: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.09.2015 10:45, Daniele Pedroni wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > yes, definitely, thank you a lot! > > So, if I got your point, with your updated svn.exe I'll be able to test if > command line work properly, but I'll have to wait for TortoiseSVN update to > use it? Or the latter relies on the same svn.

win32svn for 1.9.1?

2015-09-07 Thread Barry Scott
I see that the recent 1.7 and 1.8 win32svn builds being announced, thanks for them. Do you know when the svn 1.9 win32svn build might be available? Barry

chcp has no effect on output encoding for chcp

2015-09-07 Thread Matthias Ludwig
Hello, I'm using svnlook on a precommit-hook and have some problems with the output encoding. Os: windows 7 Apache 2.4 Apache subversion: testet version 1.8 / 1.9 from different distributions see below how does svnlook determine the output encoding? I found statements that the output encoding is

Problem with checkout when using timestamp

2015-09-07 Thread Sascha.Retter
Hello, I am not subscribed so please be so kind to add me to CC regarding this topic. We are experiencing a problem with Subversion since some days and we are not able to recognize any changes made to the server. As soon as we try to checkout using a timestamp (e.g. svn --username some_user co

Re: R: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Marco Pelagatti
Branko Čibej wandisco.com> writes: > > On 07.09.2015 10:45, Daniele Pedroni wrote: > > Hi Ivan, > > > > yes, definitely, thank you a lot! > > > > So, if I got your point, with your updated svn.exe I'll be able to test if command line work properly, but > I'll have to wait for TortoiseSVN update

Aw: win32svn for 1.9.1?

2015-09-07 Thread Andreas Stieger
Hi, Barry Scott wrote: > I see that the recent 1.7 and 1.8 win32svn builds being announced, thanks for > them. > > Do you know when the svn 1.9 win32svn build might be available? Available at other binary "vendors": https://subversion.apache.org/packages.html#windows Andreas

Access configuration for leaves in one working copy

2015-09-07 Thread Holger Schmidt
Hi, There is a repository with this directory tree: root +- dir_a +- dir_b | +- dir_c | +- dir_d +- dir_e +- dir_f +- dir_g Because there is sensible data in there user usr_u has read/write access only to dir_c and dir_g. Question: How do I configure this with the path based authoriz

Re: Access configuration for leaves in one working copy

2015-09-07 Thread Eric Johnson
Why do you need one working copy? > On Sep 7, 2015, at 5:31 AM, Holger Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > There is a repository with this directory tree: > > root > +- dir_a > +- dir_b > | +- dir_c > | +- dir_d > +- dir_e > +- dir_f > +- dir_g > > Because there is sensible data in there user usr_u

Re: Problem with checkout when using timestamp

2015-09-07 Thread Eric Johnson
I have run into what might be the same issue. Can you perform svn log operations using timestamps? Or does that also trigger an internal server error? My guess is that you have some revisions in your repository that are empty, probably because you did a filter on a dump, but preserved revisions. T

Re: Access configuration for leaves in one working copy

2015-09-07 Thread Holger Schmidt
It should be one working copy to be able to move resources from one leaf to another or to commit changes that affect multiple leaves in one changeset. The leaves belong to one project, so it was a logical choice to have them in one working copy. Regards, Holger On 07.09.2015 16:20, Eric Joh

Announcing MaxSVN

2015-09-07 Thread Stefan
Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of a new distribution of SVN called: "MaxSVN". In contrast to other SVN distributions this one is a bit different since it aims towards being used primarily to support SVN development rather than being used in production environments. Its primary

Re: Access configuration for leaves in one working copy

2015-09-07 Thread Eric Johnson
Hi Holger, It is possible to reference two working copies in a single Subversion command line operation. For example, you can copy or move from one working copy to another. Eric > On Sep 7, 2015, at 7:34 AM, Holger Schmidt wrote: > > It should be one working copy to be able to move resources fr

Re: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Ivan Zhakov
[Moving to dev@s.a.o] On 4 September 2015 at 18:15, Daniele Pedroni wrote: > After updating from 1.8.X to 1.9.X (tried also 1.9.1, no luck), TortoiseSVN > as well as command line throw the following error after trying to checkout > or commit a Working Directory on a network share: > > Commit fail

Re: Access denied error on checkout-commit after updating to 1.9.X

2015-09-07 Thread Ivan Zhakov
[Moving to dev@s.a.o] On 4 September 2015 at 18:15, Daniele Pedroni wrote: > After updating from 1.8.X to 1.9.X (tried also 1.9.1, no luck), TortoiseSVN > as well as command line throw the following error after trying to checkout > or commit a Working Directory on a network share: > > Commit fail

Re: win32svn for 1.9.1?

2015-09-07 Thread Barry Scott
> On 7 Sep 2015, at 11:43, Andreas Stieger wrote: > > Hi, > > Barry Scott wrote: >> I see that the recent 1.7 and 1.8 win32svn builds being announced, thanks >> for >> them. >> >> Do you know when the svn 1.9 win32svn build might be available? > > Available at other binary "vendors": > http

Re: win32svn for 1.9.1?

2015-09-07 Thread Win32Svn
On 2015-09-07 18:59, Barry Scott wrote: On 7 Sep 2015, at 11:43, Andreas Stieger wrote: Hi, Barry Scott wrote: I see that the recent 1.7 and 1.8 win32svn builds being announced, thanks for them. Do you know when the svn 1.9 win32svn build might be available? Available at other binary "vendo

Re: chcp has no effect on output encoding for chcp

2015-09-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Matthias Ludwig wrote on Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:45:13 +0200: > The use of the subversion language bindings is no alternative because there > exists no language bindings for svnlook. svnlook just wraps the svn_fs/svn_repos APIs, which do have bindings: % python2 >>> from svn.fs import *

Re: Subversion 1.9.1 and SVNParentPath

2015-09-07 Thread Tony Butt
On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 10:20 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > [Please keep the conversation on-list, others are interested in it, too. > I'm replying privately, since I can't just make your private message > public without your consent; but please follow up on the list, if you > don't mind.] > > On 07

Re: Subversion 1.9.1 and SVNParentPath

2015-09-07 Thread Tony Butt
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 09:41 +1000, Tony Butt wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 10:20 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > > > On 07.09.2015 10:07, Tony Butt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 09:59 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > > >> On 07.09.2015 02:16, Tony Butt wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 07/09/15 10:10

Re: Subversion 1.9.1 and SVNParentPath

2015-09-07 Thread Tony Butt
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 12:52 +1000, Tony Butt wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 09:41 +1000, Tony Butt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 10:20 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > > > > > > On 07.09.2015 10:07, Tony Butt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 09:59 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > >> O