Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 29.04.2015 05:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: >>> Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format >>> lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Branko Čibej
On 29.04.2015 07:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 29.04.2015 05:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Philip Martin
Branko Čibej writes: > In any case, 1.8 /should/ be able to dump an FSFSv1 repository, and the > /db/current file should exists; it's been around since FSFSv1. > You can try recreating it; the format is described here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 29.04.2015 07:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 29.04.2015 05:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: > Does anyone have

RE: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Andrew Reedick
> -Original Message- > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] > Are we talking about the repository format or the FSFS format here? If > /db/fs-type says "fsfs" then the repository format > (/format) is probably 3 and you're talking about /db/format, > yes? The distinction is i

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Philip Martin
Andrew Reedick writes: > Bad News: However, it seems that I have bigger issues: > * Dumped revision 109662. > svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file > 'devel_copy\db\revprops\109663': The system cannot find the file > specified. > > When I sort the files in db/revs numerically, I see gap

Re: Cannot checkout or clean up using 1.9 dev build

2015-04-29 Thread Bert Huijben
I’m not sure if the \\?\ format is supported in the new rename api(as this is an option in certain publi apis and not a low level supported format), but it should certainly be used in the fallback codepath where the normal rename is tried, like hiw it is in apr. But if the new api fails with t

Re: Cannot checkout or clean up using 1.9 dev build

2015-04-29 Thread Branko Čibej
On 29.04.2015 21:28, Bert Huijben wrote: > I’m not sure if the \\?\ format is supported in > the new rename api(as this is an option in certain publi apis and not > a low level supported format), but it should certainly be used in the > fallback codepath where the normal rename is tried, like hiw

Svn rename doesn't copy custom properties

2015-04-29 Thread Dan Ellis
Hi, We use some custom properties for tracking (e.g. my_prop:trace_to req_12345) and have noticed that svn renames do not copy these across the delete/add operation. I've tried searching the archives to see if I could find a rationale as to why, but haven't come across any. I'm guessing this cou

Re: Svn rename doesn't copy custom properties

2015-04-29 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Dan Ellis wrote on Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 15:43:00 -0700: > Hi, > > We use some custom properties for tracking (e.g. my_prop:trace_to > req_12345) and have noticed that svn renames do not copy these across the > delete/add operation. I've tried searching the archives to see if I could > find a rati

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Daniel Shahaf
[snipping the part about db/revs, this is only about db/revprops] Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 18:53:04 +0100: > Andrew Reedick writes: > > > Bad News: However, it seems that I have bigger issues: > > * Dumped revision 109662. > > svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file > > 'd

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-29 Thread Daniel Shahaf
For future reference: if svnadmin is version 1.9 or newer, it should have the 'info' subcommand, which will display both the repository format and the FS format. http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.9#svnadmin-info Daniel (1.9 hasn't been released yet, as of this writing) Andrew Ree

Re: Svn rename doesn't copy custom properties

2015-04-29 Thread Dan Ellis
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Dan Ellis wrote on Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 15:43:00 -0700: > > Hi, > > > > We use some custom properties for tracking (e.g. my_prop:trace_to > > req_12345) and have noticed that svn renames do not copy these across the > > delete/add operation.

Re: Svn rename doesn't copy custom properties

2015-04-29 Thread jblist
> On Apr 29, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Dan Ellis wrote: > > This is specific to the rename operation (svn 1.8.9, win7): > > c:\Project_files\sandbox>svn pl -v .txt > Properties on '.txt': > myprop:trace_to > req12345 > > c:\Project_files\sandbox>svn rename .txt .txt > A T

Re: Svn rename doesn't copy custom properties

2015-04-29 Thread Dan Ellis
OK, so it gets stranger... I admit I changed the property names a bit to simplify them. When I ran the simplified names, it does work. Here's the exact example that does not work: c:\Project_files\sandbox_v2>svn pl -v A.txt Properties on 'A.txt': pebls:plcm Test@4575 pebls:sha1