On Jun 16, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Roy Umbach wrote:
> Subversion reported the following
What were you doing when that happened?
On Jun 13, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Ed wrote:
> I don't know whether I'm sending this post to the correct address, as the
> instructions for bug reporting are very poorly written.
Do you have a suggestion for how the instructions could be improved?
On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:16 AM, Roy Umbach wrote:
> Doing an update to reflect the changes a colleague added ...
When replying, you should reply to all, so that your message reaches the list
too, not just me. I've re-added the list address to this reply so that the list
gets your message and can h
Also, repositories can be sharded, and complete shards can be packed, which can
result in some space savings. Sharding is on by default now for new
repositories, but packing must be done manually.
So to answer your question, yes, there are a number of normal situations that
could result in two
Hi,
We’ve been using svn successfully for years on a server, and now have to
migrate to a new one. We are hit by the known issue of svn:externals containing
absolute paths to the repo to be moved, since we started with versions <1.5
without support for relative URLs.
We’ve been researching how
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Brisset, Nicolas <
nicolas.bris...@airbus.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We’ve been using svn successfully for years on a server, and now have to
> migrate to a new one. We are hit by the known issue of svn:externals
> containing absolute paths to the repo to be moved,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Brisset, Nicolas <
nicolas.bris...@airbus.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We’ve been using svn successfully for years on a server, and now have to
> migrate to a new one. We are hit by the known issue of svn:externals
> containing absolute paths to the repo to be moved,
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Brisset, Nicolas
mailto:nicolas.bris...@airbus.com>> wrote:
Hi,
We've been using svn successfully for years on a server, and now have to
migrate to a new one. We are hit by the known issue of svn:externals
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
> In our duplication effort, we also set all the permissions on the old
> repositories to read-only, to limit the chances of cross-contamination.
>
> Regards,
>
> Geoff
This. So much this. When people want to keep, and keep cross-merging,
the c
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
>
> > In our duplication effort, we also set all the permissions
> > on the old repositories to read-only, to limit the chances
> > of cross-contamination.
Just to be clear, I'm not talking about the FILE permissions
10 matches
Mail list logo
