RE: Branch/switch/merge question

2013-11-28 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (svn4)
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com] > > Not sure what you mean about with sparse and recursive checkouts or > why you'd start with /. If there is one project in the repository > you would normally just check out /trunk. Or with multiple projects, > /project_name/trunk. ... see

Re: Branch/switch/merge question

2013-11-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (svn4) wrote: > > But I prefer to do this: > svn co --depth=immediates $URL > svn update --set-depth infinity project/trunk > svn update --set-depth immediates project/branches > svn update --set-depth infinity project/branches/eharvey > > Because

Re: Hardware requirements for windows subversion

2013-11-28 Thread John Beranek
On 27/11/2013 16:03, Pavel Lyalyakin wrote: > Hello Ram, > [snip] > > If you want to start using Subversion server right now, then take a > closer look at VisualSVN Server. It installs in no time and is very > convenient to configure and manage. In fact, VisualSVN Server works > out of the box an

Re: UNS: Re: Branch/switch/merge question

2013-11-28 Thread Andreas Krey
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:58:08 +, Les Mikesell wrote: ... > different people were working on the separate copies. What commit > log message would ever be appropriate if you commit to both the trunk > and branch through an upper level directory that ties them together? svn commit -m 'just to co