From: kai-uwe.schie...@hydrometer.de [mailto:kai-uwe.schie...@hydrometer.de]
Sent: donderdag 21 november 2013 18:15
To: s...@elego.de
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: servers "ssl-authority-files" with svn lib
> Hi Stefan!
>
> Thanks for your response.
> You are right. Code would
On 11/21/13 10:37 AM, sbre...@hotmail.com wrote:
> 1. Any user accessing Subversion has to be authenticated against the Unix
> password database. Works.
> 2. Before we hit the Subversion module I would like to authorize the user
> against the file system. Does not work.
>
> I have repositories l
Ben Reser wrote on Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:58:39 -0800:
> So in the soon to be released 1.8.5 and 1.7.14 we are filling in the filename
> on the request_rec with svn:/path/to/repo/path/in/repo. For instance if you
> swapped svn: with file:// you'd be able to use this as a URL to a svn command
> on
sbre...@hotmail.com wrote on Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 18:37:21 +:
> I am very happy with the SSH + 'svnserve' access to my repositories,
> however due to firewall issues I need access through HTTP as well.
> What I do not want is to set up a 2nd authentication / authorization
> database.
What are
On 11/22/13 2:56 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Might not be a bad idea then to make the artificial/invalid
> request_rec.filename value look less like a URL then? Just in case it
> ends up in someone's "(gdb) p" output, or in a log file, etc.
>
> For example, "svn+invalid:/usr/local/svn/ppt/trunk".
Ben Reser wrote on Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 15:16:10 -0800:
> On 11/22/13 2:56 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Might not be a bad idea then to make the artificial/invalid
> > request_rec.filename value look less like a URL then? Just in case it
> > ends up in someone's "(gdb) p" output, or in a log file,
On 11/22/13 3:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> How about "dav_svn:/" then? That's consistent with mod_proxy's
> precedent you cite and not similarly-confusing to the "svn://" URL
> scheme.
Yeah I probably should have used that but it's a little late for that since the
release is already rolled and a
Ben Reser wrote on Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 15:22:44 -0800:
> On 11/22/13 3:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > How about "dav_svn:/" then? That's consistent with mod_proxy's
> > precedent you cite and not similarly-confusing to the "svn://" URL
> > scheme.
>
> Yeah I probably should have used that but i
