Hi,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Guillaume Lasnier
wrote:
> Hi Lieven,
> Please find attached the tcpdump that dumps traffic between my laptop and
> the proxy. The only information I could get about the proxy is that it's
> an ISA server.
from the trace I don't really see what's going on, t
Dear User Support,
Could you tell us the specifications about the authentication with IPv6 ?
These behavior bothers us about IPv6.
-When connecting to SVN server with IPv6, the client tool(TortoiseSVN:TSVN)
can't handle the authentication operation.
-Only with IPv6, the Operating system handle
I have recently updated to TSVN 1.8.1, which of course uses SVN 1.8.1 as its
command-line basis. Our server has been running 1.2 and has not been changed
(apart from Windows updates) for a LONG time.
(Yes, I know 1.2 is very old. However, we're an automotive company and changes
to our tools c
Guten Tag Okabayashi, Hirotsugu,
am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 09:17 schrieben Sie:
> -Only with IPv6, the Operating system handle the authentication.
What does this mean?
> So, both authenticated case and not authenticated case,
> TSVN doesn't work. TSVN display the same error message.
You s
On Aug 4, 2013, at 21:27, Thomas Harold wrote:
> On 8/4/2013 6:30 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Check the file /backup/svndump/test3/db/format.
>
> # cat /backup/svndump/test3/db/format
> 6
> layout sharded 1000
>
> Okay, so I was looking at the wrong thing.
>
> That still raises the question (
On Aug 1, 2013, at 19:06, Geoff Field wrote:
> I have recently updated to TSVN 1.8.1, which of course uses SVN 1.8.1 as its
> command-line basis. Our server has been running 1.2 and has not been changed
> (apart from Windows updates) for a LONG time.
>
> (Yes, I know 1.2 is very old. However
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Geoff Field wrote:
> I have recently updated to TSVN 1.8.1, which of course uses SVN 1.8.1 as its
> command-line basis. Our server has been running 1.2 and has not been changed
> (apart from Windows updates) for a LONG time.
>
> (Yes, I know 1.2 is very old.
Hi all!
The new "automatic merge" feature in subversion 1.8 look promising, but in our
case prevents merging the trunk into a branch since subversion incorrectly
interprets this operation as a reintegration merge and complains about missing
revisions which should have been merged first
Lieven Govaerts writes:
>> C:\Customer>svn log -v ./
>> svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 501 'Method Not Implemented' on
>> '/Subversio
>> n/W3000_Customer_198.622-00_Customer_DRL/!svn/bc/14/trunk/03_Software'
>>
>> svn: E27: Additional errors:
>> svn: E27: The requested report is un
Philip Martin writes:
> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>
>>> C:\Customer>svn log -v ./
>>> svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 501 'Method Not Implemented' on
>>> '/Subversio
>>> n/W3000_Customer_198.622-00_Customer_DRL/!svn/bc/14/trunk/03_Software'
>>>
>>> svn: E27: Additional errors:
>>> svn: E
Hi Everyone,
I've got a question about "--non-interactive" and "--force-interactive"
flags behavior in Subversion 1.8.
I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, please put my email in Cc in any
responses.
We've got java application interacting with svn.exe command line
utility. For Subversion
I notice that there are several entries in the users community concerning
viewing log entries since upgrading to subversion 1.8.1 64-bit version, I would
like to backup their issue.
Since updating my machine to 1.8.1 build 24570 64-bit on the 25th July,
although I can commit, I cannot see any
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Alison Sissins wrote:
> I notice that there are several entries in the users community concerning
> viewing log entries since upgrading to subversion 1.8.1 64-bit version, I
> would like to backup their issue.
>
>
>
> Since updating my machine to 1.8.1 build 24570 6
On 05.08.2013 12:14, Konstantin Kolosovsky wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've got a question about "--non-interactive" and
> "--force-interactive" flags behavior in Subversion 1.8.
> I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, please put my email in Cc in
> any responses.
>
> We've got java application int
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 05.08.2013 12:14, Konstantin Kolosovsky wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've got a question about "--non-interactive" and
>> "--force-interactive" flags behavior in Subversion 1.8.
>> I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, please put my email
On 05.08.2013 16:12, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 05.08.2013 12:14, Konstantin Kolosovsky wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I've got a question about "--non-interactive" and
>>> "--force-interactive" flags behavior in Subversion 1.8.
>>> I'm not s
There seems to be a problem with the merge logic in SVN when merging
repeated added & deleted changes out-of-order.
Example activity on branch A:
r1: A new file is added.
r2: A line is added
r3: The line is removed
r4: The line is re-added
Later activity on branch B (created from A@r1):
r5: r2 and
Many thanks for your reply.
Although the repository was not in the list of cached repositories I deleted
the repositories listed, and unticked the "Enable log caching", and now the
complete log history is there.
Kind regards
Alison
Alison Sissins | Analyst/Programmer
N J Froment & Co Limited |
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> The better option of course is to just use the JavaHL API instead.
>> I have seen this problem as well. We have a Java server application
>> that scripts the command line so that it can retrieve and accept the
>> SSL certificate. We added
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>>
C:\Customer>svn log -v ./
svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 501 'Method Not Implemented' on
'/Subversio
n/W3000_Customer_198.622-00_Customer_DRL/!svn/bc/14/trunk/0
Lieven Govaerts writes:
> Can you test if attached patch fixes this issue?
> Index: subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c
> ===
> --- subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c (revision 1510435)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c (working c
On 8/2/2013 3:21 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Our migration process:
>
> 0. svnadmin verify oldreponame
1. svnadmin dump oldreponame
2. svnadmin create newreponame
3. Modify db/fsfs.conf
[rep-sharing]
enable-rep-sharing = true # defaults to true in 1.8
[deltification]
enable-dir-deltification
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>
>> Can you test if attached patch fixes this issue?
>
>> Index: subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c
>> ===
>> --- subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c (revisi
Hello all,
Our team is proud to announce SubGit 2.0.0 release! New version is
available for download at SubGit web site at http://subgit.com/
SubGit lets one to set up a bi-directional Git-SVN mirror, and thus it
allows users to choose freely between Subversion and Git version control
systems. Su
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Fredrik Orderud wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with the merge logic in SVN when merging
> repeated added & deleted changes out-of-order.
>
> Example activity on branch A:
> r1: A new file is added.
> r2: A line is added
> r3: The line is removed
> r4: The line
Lieven Govaerts writes:
>> Yes, it does. It also affects mergeinfo:
>>
>> $ svn1.8 mergeinfo ^/ wc
>> svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 501 'Method Not Implemented' on
>> '/obj/repo/!svn/bc/1/A'
>> svn: E27: Additional errors:
>> svn: E27: The requested report is unknown.
>>
>> $ sub
> From: lieven.govaerts
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > Philip Martin writes:
> >
> >> Lieven Govaerts writes:
> >>
> C:\Customer>svn log -v ./
> svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 501 'Method Not
> Implemented'
> on '/Subversio
> n/W3000_Custome
Dear User Support,
Sorry to mistake. This is correct.
Could you tell us the specifications about the authentication with IPv6 ?
These behavior bothers us about IPv6.
-When connecting to SVN server with IPv6, the client tool(TortoiseSVN:TSVN)
can't handle the authentication operation.
-Only wit
Guten Tag Okabayashi, Hirotsugu,
am Dienstag, 6. August 2013 um 01:54 schrieben Sie:
> Sorry to mistake. This is correct.
You should really NOT create new threads for an already mentioned
problem without providing any more details. Please stay on one thread
only.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorst
29 matches
Mail list logo
